I subscribe to the major league baseball streaming video broadcasts using DSL and on both of my computers (Athlon 64's with ATI video cards), I've noticed that Real Player delivers much better images, i.e. smoother and more detailed. I wonder if anyone else has noticed the same differences on their system.
I'm curious why that would be so. I find it difficult to imagine that Real's technology is really that much better than MS's.
jwm
P.S. I have XP Home on my laptop and XP Pro on the desktop.
I'm curious why that would be so. I find it difficult to imagine that Real's technology is really that much better than MS's.
jwm
P.S. I have XP Home on my laptop and XP Pro on the desktop.

