KD argued that it was his body and his right when it came to the vaccine mandate, never once did I hear from him that it was Doug Ford's decision or anything about the democratic process.
Protesters outside several conservative SC justices residences
- Thread starter K Douglas
- Start date
Just wait until Biden talks about gun registration. Kirk, Dutch and JC will start ranting about "the Constitution and our constitutional rights" and this democratic rights nonsense will be totally forgotten.
Still having problems seeing the obvious, eh? Too bad you're not a black lesbian because you'll never get to the bench on your legal expertise.
So what's your actual argument, JC?
Your usual shtick is simply to troll, insult and harass people you don't like on this board and then post "rtflmfao" when your confronted and then bail out of the thread. Can we get an actual argument from you this time, or are you just mocking me and insulting me?
You going to stick around on this thread? Or just bail out as usual, now that I've called you out?
If anything there weren't enough arrests. Most people got away with looting, violence and arson. Billions of dollars worth of it. Go to Minneapolis right now you'll see the damage that still exists.
The left ruins everything.
Ah, back to wanting more authoritarian rule, police brutality and putting some 'people' in their place.
In City After City, Police Mishandled Black Lives Matter Protests (Published 2021)
Inquiries into law enforcement’s handling of the George Floyd protests last summer found insufficient training and militarized responses — a widespread failure in policing nationwide.
Thousands of officers were injured due to the 'mostly peaceful' protests. Frozen water bottles. Molotov cocktails. Bricks. Cinder blocks.Ah, back to wanting more authoritarian rule, police brutality and putting some 'people' in their place.
In City After City, Police Mishandled Black Lives Matter Protests (Published 2021)
Inquiries into law enforcement’s handling of the George Floyd protests last summer found insufficient training and militarized responses — a widespread failure in policing nationwide.www.nytimes.com
But ya it's all their fault. OK buddy
The Left ruins everything.......................except The Black Music Thread..............sorry Dougie i couldnt resist..........lol.............we are miles and miles apart about politics,economics and social issues..........but our mutual love of music, allows us to at least co exist.....
So I've set you straight on this several times already. No "leftie" politician - by which you mean the Dems - endorsed the violence. There was looting which was just opportunistic. And confrontation and shoving. Happens at many demos. Happened in Ottawa with the "truckers". Happened on 6 January in DC.
Race issue demos traditionally tend to attract hangers-on who destroy property. It's an unfortunate feature. Those events attract assholes and idiots. Those are not "lefties". Those are assholes who attach themselves to the events.
OTOH, the people who shat in the halls and beat cops on 6 January were actually core participants of those events.
Joe can talk about gun registration all he wants, even in service of a proposal to amend the constitution, but he won't be able to override the constitution as currently written.
Again, no one is endorsing or excusing that. Why were there not more arrests?... Again, this has been explained to you. It's difficult to perform mass arrests in a violent demo situation. It's got nothing to do with policy and everything to do with the capability of the cops on the scene. Ditto trials and convictions. It's difficult for the cops to keep accurate notes of which demonstrator did what and obtain convictions and the trials bog down the justice system to little end result.Thousands of officers were injured due to the 'mostly peaceful' protests. Frozen water bottles. Molotov cocktails. Bricks. Cinder blocks.
But ya it's all their fault. OK buddy
That's why charges in mass arrest situations often eventually get dropped. As with the "truckers" blocking of Ottawa and the Peace Bridge or 6 January. Same thing. This has all been explained to you multiple times and you still post the same nonsense.
Yes. The point is that you and your buds will rally to protect constitutional gun rights, but two minutes later say that a constitution is unnecessary where abortion rights or gay rights are concerned. Blatant example of cherry picking and inconsistency.
You must be kidding. My position on both issues is to enforce the constitution. The constitution protects gun ownership rights. The constitution also protects state rights to legislate on matters such as abortion. Perfectly consistent. Just as you are perfectly consistent in ignoring the constitution whenever you feel you "know better".
97% of the protests were non-violent.Thousands of officers were injured due to the 'mostly peaceful' protests. Frozen water bottles. Molotov cocktails. Bricks. Cinder blocks.
But ya it's all their fault. OK buddy
Some of the violence was started by right winger agitators, some by over eager cops and some by anarchists.
None of that violence was supported by the protesters, the movement or the people.
And none of it lessens the import of why they were protesting.
So this is what you wrote:
The Supreme Court can make a flawed decision that doesn't uphold the Constitution.
What the hell are you trying to say?.... The Supreme Court interprets and defines the Constitution. It is literally impossible for the SC to misinterpret the Constitution because it is the ultimate authority on constitutional interpretation. It is literally unable to make a mistake.
You can disagree with what the USSC writes. But they don't give a fuck about your thoughts and opinions.
So what are you trying to say there?... That you would have made a different decision? If so, no one cares.
The current problem is when you have 2 differently constituted SC's that make diametrically opposed decisions without explaining exactly why. In the past, you had that occur with civil rights decisions in the 50's - 70's and that could be explained by changes in attitude towards civil rights issues by society at large. So most people outside the South were fine with it. The current reversal fucks with that because society at large still massively supports Roe v Wade - about 70% support. So the reversal is clearly just due to court-stacking with anti abortion judges that represent a minority religious anti abortion opinion held by about 15% of the population.
And that is going to screw up the whole judicial system which is based on respect for caselaw, prior decisions and precedents. Among other massive problems.
