Project 2025 is an excellent case because there is a lot of dishonest framing about it as well as just lies concerning what is in there.Same with Project 2025, its important to check all the plan details.
Project 2025 is an excellent case because there is a lot of dishonest framing about it as well as just lies concerning what is in there.Same with Project 2025, its important to check all the plan details.
So, you won't do your homework, but demand others do it for you? May I respectfully ask where is your information? Why won't you show it?Sorry, I don't accept homework from strangers on the internet.
How about you show your work and we can take it from there?
I can sit here and throw generalizations around too. Would that be your preference?
Always with the half truths. Obama did do separations, but only in extreme cases and stopped the policy before Trump took power. Trump, and Steven Miller, basically adopted it, and supercharged it to be as horrific as possible. A weapon to scare families from crossing the border illegally. Cry all you want, but the reality is Trump did this and should own it. As for crickets and Obama, there was outrage. There was anger. It happened at the time, and that's one reason they stopped it.Remember when they accused Trump of putting kids in cages, over a photograph at the border? The outrage! How could he do that! Bastard!
The it was discovered that those photos were taken during Obama's tenure. Crickets.
That pretty much sums things up.
btw the media is significantly more left-leaning across the board.
Compare the media outlets on the left vs the right in terms of magnitude, audience, reach, etc.
View attachment 342239
https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart
The left side used to be respected. That's not the case any longer. As evident by things like viewership for CNN as an example.Always with the half truths. Obama did do separations, but only in extreme cases and stopped the policy before Trump took power. Trump, and Steven Miller, basically adopted it, and supercharged it to be as horrific as possible. A weapon to scare families from crossing the border illegally. Cry all you want, but the reality is Trump did this and should own it. As for crickets and Obama, there was outrage. There was anger. It happened at the time, and that's one reason they stopped it.
Now, onto the media. I'm familiar with these charts. I don't necessarily disagree with it, but it does strip out accuracy. You should understand that "leaning" means it can be objective and not spin bullshit. I also question some the include in the left-leaning. NPR, if you listen to it, tries to be centrist. Yahoo...do they even write their own shit?
An interesting thing to see: Look at the left-leaning and right-leaning. Notice how virtually all on the left are respected and reputable? While on the right-leaning....Not so much. The Epoch Times? Fox Business? The Washington Times? They sure as fuck aren't equals.
The first photos were from Trump run centres. It was later that they produced Obama-era pics. Never let facts get in the way of a good spin job.The left side used to be respected. That's not the case any longer. As evident by things like viewership for CNN as an example.
Re the photo...I think you missed the point. When the photo was released, even before anyone could confirm when it was taken, it was assumed it was something to do with Trump and was marketed as such to play into the ongoing negative narrative.
That's how far the campaign of doom/gloom has gone. It has been achieved by instilling a cognitive bias towards anything having to do with Trump and conservatives in general.
Let's see what fact checks produce?The first photos were from Trump run centres. It was later that they produced Obama-era pics. Never let facts get in the way of a good spin job.
And how do you feel about the way Trump and the right spins. Saying the US is in decline and the left wants to destroy America. It is interesting how you cry when the left points out actual plans by MAGA that they are moaning about doom and gloom, but you never criticize what they say about the left. Please. And
And this refers to pictures some how? As in, your original critique was that they allegedly used a photo showing Obama-era "cages" with separated children and blamed it on Trump? As for cages, yes, some were built during Obama's time. But the majority were Trump. As were the boondogle of the situation where they lost families. That didn't happen under Obama. That was due to the Trump administrations ineptitude.Let's see what fact checks produce?
MICHELLE OBAMA, on Americans: “They watch in horror as children are torn from their families and thrown into cages.”
THE FACTS: The reference to cages is misleading and a matter that Democrats have persistently distorted.
https://apnews.com/article/election...ion-politics-2663c84832a13cdd7a8233becfc7a5f3
The article says this...did you read the whole thing?And this refers to pictures some how? As in, your original critique was that they allegedly used a photo showing Obama-era "cages" with separated children and blamed it on Trump? As for cages, yes, some were built during Obama's time. But the majority were Trump. As were the boondogle of the situation where they lost families. That didn't happen under Obama. That was due to the Trump administrations ineptitude.
Are you now saying its wrong, or are you arguing its great because Obama did it as well?The article says this...did you read the whole thing?
"At the height of the controversy over Trump’s zero-tolerance policy at the border, photos that circulated online of children in the enclosures generated great anger. But those photos — by The Associated Press — were taken in 2014 and depicted some of the thousands of unaccompanied children held by President Barack Obama."
Those photos are what sparked the backlash on Trump...and crickets after confirming they were Obama-era photos.
That is the point I keep making that you are missing here.
Are you now saying its wrong, or are you arguing its great because Obama did it as well?
Does this mean you're now super happy at this new plan?
I'm saying when it was determined that the photos were from the Obama era, the outrage over those photos stopped and all that remained was the sound of crickets.Are you now saying its wrong, or are you arguing its great because Obama did it as well?
Does this mean you're now super happy at this new plan?
The key word here is "at the height of the controversy," because the first photos were not from the AP. The very first photos came from the Houston Chronicle in late 2017. Then, for some reason, the AP shit was spread around.The article says this...did you read the whole thing?
"At the height of the controversy over Trump’s zero-tolerance policy at the border, photos that circulated online of children in the enclosures generated great anger. But those photos — by The Associated Press — were taken in 2014 and depicted some of the thousands of unaccompanied children held by President Barack Obama."
Those photos are what sparked the backlash on Trump...and crickets after confirming they were Obama-era photos.
That is the point I keep making that you are missing here.
What photos?I'm saying when it was determined that the photos were from the Obama era, the outrage over those photos stopped and all that remained was the sound of crickets.
Funny eh?
You're confused again because you jumped into a conversation without following the context.What photos?
I was talking about rump's plan to kick out immigrants.
The context is rump is planning on a much more drastic plan for immigrants and you're trying to talk about an old photo instead.You're confused again because you jumped into a conversation without following the context.
Every time. Without fail. Total troll tactic.
Wrong...the context was comparing public opinion about Obama vs Trump in a conversation between Silentkisser and I.The context is rump is planning on a much more drastic plan for immigrants and you're trying to talk about an old photo instead.