Quantity has a quality of its own. But then again you have all kinda of videos of freshly NATO trained Ukrainians stumbling into RusMost sian minefields with horrific consequences. The Russian were certainly rough around the edges at the start of the SMO, but now they are experienced and innovative. They are using combined methods and new and old weapons in ways never done before
Pro-Putin and pro-Russia thread
- Thread starter oil&gas
- Start date
So when is "Invincible Russian Army" going to take big offensive and get great victory, Notty?
The last offensive for the Russians was about 6 months ago when it gloriously seized about 200 yards of Bakhmut.
Not on this level, Notty. Well, except.....
Glorious Russian Army in 1941 which is lose 5 millions men in just 2 months to cowardly, scared Wehrmacht.
Glorious Russian Army in 1914 which is lose almost million men to cowardly German weaklings.
Glorious Russian Army in 1905 which is lose all Manchuria to weak, frightened Japanese Army.
Glorious Russian Army in 1877 which is almost - but not quite - get beaten by Ottoman Turks.
Glorious Russian Army in 1854 which is send Glorious Russian soldiers with 60 year old smoothbore flintlocks (range = 75 yards) to fight British army with modern rifles (range = 600 yards).
BREAKING! Ukraine SURRENDERING by the thousands, NATO desperate to keep war going | Redacted
New reports show Ukrainian forces are laying down their western weapons and surrendering by the thousands using an emergency radio frequency. The surrerender...
www.youtube.com
On one side of the conflict is a people known historically for its inept, disorganized and
incompetent military. On the other side is a heroic people financed by a bunch of affluent
sissy leaders in the west. Looking to history as a guide Russia/Soviet almost invariably
had to pay a heavier price to win a war. I think Soviet casualties could easily be greater
in the war with the dinky army of Nazi-allied Finland by two or threefold in WWII and we know
who the winner was. If Russia turns out to be the side that suffers higher casualties this time
it is not unthinkable history will repeat itself again.
Feel free to join the CAF in a combat arms trade, complete basic military qualification, ship off and graduate from battle school, then report to your unit and let the Sergeant Major and the Colonel know that you think they're sissies. I'd love to see how you withstand a single afternoon of defaulters.
You have no idea what you're talking about, as you've admitted before. So maybe don't go around insulting military leaders until you've at least laced up a pair of combat boots.
I am not a sissy, I'm a coward.
As for the idea that you can't insult military leaders until you have laced up a pair of combat boots. Come on dude, really.
Human beings are able to learn things without direct experience in them.
Also being a grunt and being a general are two very different things.
In addition the idea that someone who was not in the military dare not ever question a military leader has staggering implications in a democracy. What is next, nobody should dare speak on public policy until you have done a PHD in Economics focusing on the field.
You don't seem to have a problem when civilians shit on Russian military performance and there is ever so much to shit on.
By Oil's standards, FDR and the US before 1941 are sissies. So the comment isn't worth taking seriously.
