Another pro pally making excuses for anti Jewish intimidation. Where in the video they asked him to use another entrance?
Pro Hamas in the west - and their adventures
- Thread starter mandrill
- Start date
One of the guys asks him to go around in the beginning of the video. Protests are not intimidations. That's just the professional entitled indoctrinated Zionist crybaby complaining while supporting genocide just like the white supremacists acting outraged and intimidated by black folks during the civil rights movement while supporting oppression.
Preventing Jewish students from going to classes they paid for is intimidation and does nothing to help the Palestinian people. Once again like a typical pro pally who probably never visited the region making excuses for anti Jewish intimidation against Jewish students. And constantly crying "Zionist" makes you sound like an anti semitic person. Zionist is the new slur for Jews.
That is what they are. They are Zionists. There are many Jews who are anti-Zionist as well, so that line of reasoning that anti-Zionism is antisemitism falls flat right there.
They did not prevent JEWISH students from going to classes. Infact, they did not prevent anybody from going to classes. They were asking him (and possibly others) to take another route possibly because they have encamped that location to protest. You posted a 20 second video of a Zionist crybaby playing "This is what they do guys" for the cameras. All I saw were that the pro-Palestinian students were just calm and decent.
The one who was being loud and intimidating with a camera in their faces was that professional crybaby. Infact it is always the pro-Zionist supporters who are intimidating. Did you read about the recent case of arrest where a guy with a nail gun started threatening pro-Palestinian protestors and shouted "Every fucking Palestinian will die!"? Now THAT is intimidation.
That Jewish kid was actually the one intimidating and getting physical with the protestors, while making sure the cameras were on.
Last edited:
You realize that there are a lot of Jewish protesters at these university protests, don't you?
Instead we've got video of anti protester zionists physically attacking Jewish protesters.
Are you here on this board now defending attacking Jews?
Blaming the victim is not an argument
Anti-Zionism theology did not exist between 1949 and 1967 when the Gaza strip was part of Egypt and the West Bank part of Jordan. Nobody was advocating for a Palestinian state For 19 years. Anti Zionism along with the Palestinian movement was created by the Soviet Union to wage war against Israel. The fact that you blindly supporting a terrorist and anti-semitic movements invented after 1967 shows your ignorance and blindness which makes you no different from the other pro pallys most of which support terrorists abd hate crimes against Jews many of which have no ties to the state of Israel
Previous to 1949 there was a Palestinian state.
After Partition there was still a Palestinian state based on partition until Israel took it all in 1967.
Palestinians were never in favour of a foreign colonial movement coming to take their country away.
Why would they be?
Its like you're arguing that South Africans loved having Afrikaners come and take over their country and rule through apartheid.
Yes blaming the pro Palestinian protestors who are the victims here is not an argument.
And anti-zionism is the default JEWISH position and has always been. There was no Zionism prior to 1896. This was Theordre Herzls invention when he pulled it right out of his ass.
Wrong again anti-zionism arose in the 19th century to oppose the creation of a Jewish state. And why are you ignoring the period between 1949 and 1967? Zionism was supported by leftists before 1967.
Why do I think you get your information from things like this?
The history of Netanyahu's plan for Rafah, should he actually do it.
Not true.
Zionism originated with the publication of Der Judenstaat by Theodore Herzl who is the father of Zionism. There was nothing called Zionism prior to that. Infact the Balfour Declaration was itself issued to entice the Jewish leadership of the Bolsheviks to continue their support for the Allied forces during WW 1. However they rejected the idea of Zionism because they considered it a capitalist endeavour which made the Balfour Declaration a foreign policy blunder.
Jews prior to the advent of Zionism in 1896 did not even think of a Jewish state. Infact many Jews rejected the idea as it was against their religious sentiments. Their default position was anti-zionism. Anti-zionism is therefore a JEWISH invention. Therefore it cannot be and is not antisemitic.
Last edited:
So prior to 1896 they had to use different lies to defend their hatred of Jews. Regardless of the supposed reasons, why do you think that Jews have been hated and persecuted for 5,000 years?
Hammy, has it ever occurred to you that the hatred you feel is possibly not racism based but just based on your own personality?
Meanwhile, the dem party has a few issues of their own now.
You are referring to antisemitism, which is different and unrelated to Anti-zionism. Anti-zionism was the default position of the Jews both because it was against their religious ideology and because there was nothing called Zionism prior to 1896.
