Independents plainly do use drivers, and even when the independents work through an agency they pay for the driver. The real breakdown is this:
SP earns $250, pays $20 to the driver and $50 to the agency, keeps $180 in her pocket. Or maybe it's $30 to the driver and $40 to the agency, but you get the point.
Independents can and do use drivers, can and do hire phone operators, can and do pool their resources to keep one driver busy, so all this stuff about how it's not possible without an agency is just a load of bullshit.
Allison, I find you incredibly manipulative.
For the records agencies do provide a very valuable service, which is they invest in building a client list, and it really is an investment--it takes time, money, and hard work to wind up with a loyal list of customers.
At the end of the day SP's pay the agency for access to that client list. That is the fundamental basis of the transaction. Independent SP's can pool together to hire drivers and use phone services, but at the point they also start pooling together to build a common client list what you have is an agency--having a client list, a brand, is practically the definition of an agency.
What is so threatening to AC in this situation is the prospect of that client list, the sole source of AC's value-add in this situation, being poached by the escorts and/or clients negotiating side deals.
It is not out of love for the escorts that agency owners get so pissed off by this, all this talk of safety is a smoke screen, agencies do NOT add value in the safety arena.
It is because in poaching away a client via a direct deal an SP is to some small extent threatening the primary value the agency brings to the table, a direct threat to her financial interests.