President Is Dead Wrong About Climate Change: Nobel Prize Winning Scientist

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,331
7,999
113
Room 112
You flat out said that the scientific community is cooking the books. That is conspiracy theory trash.
The evidence is overwhelming that NASA,NOAA,NCDC are manipulating and adjusting data to suit their message. Remember last year they said 2014 was the hottest on record - explicitly stated on their websites. Yet they only had 38% probability that was indeed the case. They actually had to retract their statement. How can you possibly put any faith in an outfit like this that distorts, obfuscates and deliberately misleads the public?
Both the RSS and UAH satellite data tells us there has been no warming for over 18 years and I believe them much more because they don't have an agenda. They are real scientists.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,331
7,999
113
Room 112
Still can't tell the difference between weather and climate?
To understand climate you need to understand weather, you talk like they are mutually exclusive of one another. More obfuscation on your part.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,358
12
38
You flat out said that the scientific community is cooking the books. That is conspiracy theory trash.
There are papers written about the term 'conspiracy theorist'.

It usually is used in a pejorative sense, but really only applies that way when speaking of someone who believes that everything is a conspiracy, or one who believes in the most outlandish conspiracy theories when the evidence suggests otherwise.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,358
12
38
The evidence is overwhelming that NASA,NOAA,NCDC are manipulating and adjusting data to suit their message. Remember last year they said 2014 was the hottest on record - explicitly stated on their websites. Yet they only had 38% probability that was indeed the case. They actually had to retract their statement. How can you possibly put any faith in an outfit like this that distorts, obfuscates and deliberately misleads the public?
Both the RSS and UAH satellite data tells us there has been no warming for over 18 years and I believe them much more because they don't have an agenda. They are real scientists.
How can anyone say there hasn't been any warming for over 18 years when yesterday's announcement from the USA says that July 2015 was the warmest month recorded?
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,358
12
38
I think you should read this graph. BTW there is NO global warming for 18 year 6 months.

https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpr...g?w=1202&h=538 THIS LINK IS BROKEN DONT WORK SEE BELOW ONE
https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/clip_image002_thumb3.jpg?w=1202&h=538 I JUST FIXED THIS LINK WORK NOW
Here is the proof. As shown on the graph.

You can see " there is no global warming as confirmed by global measuring satellites system.

Global temps as measured by satellites, http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_July_2015_v6.png

Impossible. July 2015 was the hottest. Glaciers have been retreating, snowy mountain tops diminished or disappearing, Arctic sea ice retreating, Antarctic land ice diminishing.

I like the explanation given by Frankfooter in his subsequent post #560.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,477
6,709
113
The evidence is overwhelming that NASA,NOAA,NCDC are manipulating and adjusting data to suit their message. ....
Or the non-conspiracy view that scientists have found a more accurate technique for measuring temperature.

I can guarantee you that in the NOAA's more accurate measurement techniques resulted in a downgrade in temperature estimates they would have published that too. Some of them might be annoyed and look for reasons why but they would still publish it.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,477
6,709
113
To understand climate you need to understand weather, you talk like they are mutually exclusive of one another. More obfuscation on your part.
Weather is what is happening on a particular day. Climate is the long standing pattern. You can have a cold week while the climate is overall warming. If you can't understand the difference you should not be taking pat in this discussion.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,477
6,709
113
There are papers written about the term 'conspiracy theorist'.

It usually is used in a pejorative sense, but really only applies that way when speaking of someone who believes that everything is a conspiracy, or one who believes in the most outlandish conspiracy theories when the evidence suggests otherwise.
Applies in this case, both in the his avoidance of scientific evidence and the pejorative.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,331
7,999
113
Room 112
How can anyone say there hasn't been any warming for over 18 years when yesterday's announcement from the USA says that July 2015 was the warmest month recorded?
The source of yesterday's announcement was NASA/NOAA did you not read what I stated in post #583? NASA/GISS are continually adjusting past data records to make the current temperature seem warmer than it is. I've read the effect of this could be as great as 0.5C artificial warming of current temperature anomaly. The RSS/UAH satellite dataset shows the global anomaly being between 0.25 and 0.35C in the troposphere, the lowest layer of the atmosophere. I think this is more indicative of where we are at.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,331
7,999
113
Room 112
Applies in this case, both in the his avoidance of scientific evidence and the pejorative.
Baloney. Conspiracy is based on circumstance and conjecture, there is clear scientific evidence that shows warming isn't happening at the rate NASA/NOAA/CRU is stating.
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
NOAA claims that the global land and ocean temperature anomalies,...their words,...from 2000 thru 2015 was +0.12C/decade.

NOAA claims that the global land and ocean temperature anomalies,...their words,...from 1930 thru 1945 was +0.29C/decade.

Maybe someday we will catch up to records previously set,... for rates of increase for a span of 15 years ,...but I guess we will just have to wait another 15 years.

FAST
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,358
12
38
The source of yesterday's announcement was NASA/NOAA did you not read what I stated in post #583? NASA/GISS are continually adjusting past data records to make the current temperature seem warmer than it is. I've read the effect of this could be as great as 0.5C artificial warming of current temperature anomaly. The RSS/UAH satellite dataset shows the global anomaly being between 0.25 and 0.35C in the troposphere, the lowest layer of the atmosophere. I think this is more indicative of where we are at.
Yes I did (did you read my post # 586?).

What about surface temperatures?

Where's the evidence that they are adjusting past data records to make it look like the trend is still rising to new records?
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,358
12
38
Baloney. Conspiracy is based on circumstance and conjecture, there is clear scientific evidence that shows warming isn't happening at the rate NASA/NOAA/CRU is stating.
But your statement here implies that there indeed is warming, just not at the rate that NASA says so.

(Conspiracy can be based on evidence too, whether direct or circumstantial - usually circumstantial).
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,358
12
38
This is a great time to start buying parcels of land along the Hudson Bay shoreline. In 20 years we'll start building all-inclusive resorts and plant palm trees as rising temperatures turn the area into a Canadian Riviera.
Still too far, lol.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts