ehhh......if it was meant as a "fuck you" Trump would be sending Daddy Kushner to Trudeau.that was specialif I was macron I'd consider this a major "fuck you"
President Biden pardons son Hunter, reversing course after pledging that he wouldn’t
- Thread starter Vinson
- Start date
Wait for it I am sure Trump still has some deplorables available for this mission as well
How bout Trump sends Tucker Carlson to Ottawa?
Tucker could commute back to Maine on weekends.
Yep that would be appropriate. Wasn’t Tucker the one who was talking about liberating Canada? Or was it Joe Rogan?
Some peoples make a whole lot of money.You wouldn't even know it if Biden and Kamala robs you blind...1.5B campaign fund gone
American politics is a very lucrative business.
I simply thought it would be cool to own a TV or radio station in Pennsylvania or Wisconsin. That's not where the real money was being made.
He will if he can and I'll be honest and say, that most people facing a conviction if allowed to would do exactly that. Believe it or not, now that the human tampon won, I don't blame him for clearing up any convictions he is facing or has been charged with.and tell me it's ok for him to pardon himself...no complaints?
Well if I was in charge, I would buy all the Canadian provinces except Ontario and Quebec and merge them with Greenland.
I have no idea what you're trying to say! Sometimes attempts at unusual slang and clever patter don't translate on social media.
LOL, not at all! I'm just having a little fun man! You righties don't have any sense of humors dammit.
Buying it would be a waste of money. I’d claim that Canada has been taken over by antifa and needs to be saved. American public would love a quick little victorious war plus a martial law allowing the president to cancel 2028 elections.
The only thing that's surprising is that a dupe or two here actually think Biden was considering not pardoning his son for even one minute.
There's nothing virtuous about America's political leaders that would prevent them from using or abusing the power of the Presidential pardon. It always has been this way. It will always be this way.
It's kind of comical that every time we have an outgoing Administration we have this silly rancor about who abuses pardons more.
There's nothing virtuous about America's political leaders that would prevent them from using or abusing the power of the Presidential pardon. It always has been this way. It will always be this way.
It's kind of comical that every time we have an outgoing Administration we have this silly rancor about who abuses pardons more.
I assure you I have and will say things less clear than my grandpa/grandma gender dysphoria comment.
All you had to do was hold your wad for a few hours.
I completely agree with you on this one and if Biden had not pardoned his son I'd call him a shit dad and family should always come first! I would allow this even for the Orange Tampon even though I think his sons except for Baron are stained toilet paper. Ivanka is hot so she gets a complete pass from me.
I agree now if you will excuse me I need to shower, I feel eeky.
That is exactly what my last lay said! A few hours a few minutes does it really matter?? It did to her dammit!!!!
I know you're not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but even you should know that there's a difference.
Even the democrats aren't happy. Poor chick with the mushroom head must of stated 10 times he wasn't going to pardon him.
'It's a setback': Democrats criticize Biden over Hunter pardon
'I think he got this one wrong,' says Rep Greg Stanton
President Biden’s decision to pardon his son Hunter has sparked criticism from some of his fellow Democrats.
The move prompted a tidal wave of GOP criticism on Sunday night, but as of late Monday morning, a steady stream of Democrats had also expressed unease.
"As a father, I get it. But as someone who wants people to believe in public service again, it’s a setback," Rep. Greg Landsman, D-Ohio, wrote on X.
Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., said, "President Biden’s decision put personal interest ahead of duty and further erodes Americans’ faith that the justice system is fair and equal for all."
Hunter Biden’s sweeping pardon covers any and all possible crimes between 2014 and December 2024. It came as he was facing possible jail sentences over separate firearms and tax charges.
The 82-year-old president accused Republicans of weaponizing the justice system against his son, who he said was "selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted."
"I respect President Biden, but I think he got this one wrong," said Rep. Greg Stanton, D-Ariz. "This wasn’t a politically-motivated prosecution. Hunter committed felonies, and was convicted by a jury of his peers."
Jared Polis, the Democratic governor of Colorado, also criticized the decision.
"While as a father I certainly understand [Biden’s] natural desire to help his son by pardoning him, I am disappointed that he put his family ahead of the country. This is a bad precedent that could be abused by later Presidents and will sadly tarnish his reputation," Polis said in a lengthy statement.
"Hunter brought the legal trouble he faced on himself, and one can sympathize with his struggles while also acknowledging that no one is above the law, not a President and not a President’s son."
Still, other Democratic allies of the president pushed back.
"Look at the underlying facts and usual DOJ practice Governor," former Attorney General Eric Holder, who served with Biden in the Obama administration, responded to Polis on X.
In a separate post, Holder wrote, "No [U.S. attorney] would have charged this case given the underlying facts. After a 5 year investigation the facts as discovered only made that clear. Had his name been Joe Smith the resolution would have been — fundamentally and more fairly — a declination. Pardon warranted."
Rep. Glenn Ivey, D-Md., said he had "mixed views" on Biden's pardon.
Like Holder, Ivey argued that Hunter's family name was a factor in the prosecutions against him but worried it could set a precedent that Republicans could use in return.
"Even though I don't think Hunter Biden would have been prosecuted under those circumstances, a pardon at this point will be used against, I think, Democrats who are pushing to defend the Department of Justice against politicizing it, which is certainly what President Trump plans to do," Ivey told CNN on Monday morning.
"I know that there was a real strong sentiment in, you know, wanting to protect Hunter Biden from unfair prosecution. But this is going to be used against us when we're fighting the misuses that are coming from the Trump administration."
www.foxnews.com
'It's a setback': Democrats criticize Biden over Hunter pardon
'I think he got this one wrong,' says Rep Greg Stanton
President Biden’s decision to pardon his son Hunter has sparked criticism from some of his fellow Democrats.
The move prompted a tidal wave of GOP criticism on Sunday night, but as of late Monday morning, a steady stream of Democrats had also expressed unease.
"As a father, I get it. But as someone who wants people to believe in public service again, it’s a setback," Rep. Greg Landsman, D-Ohio, wrote on X.
Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., said, "President Biden’s decision put personal interest ahead of duty and further erodes Americans’ faith that the justice system is fair and equal for all."
Hunter Biden’s sweeping pardon covers any and all possible crimes between 2014 and December 2024. It came as he was facing possible jail sentences over separate firearms and tax charges.
The 82-year-old president accused Republicans of weaponizing the justice system against his son, who he said was "selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted."
"I respect President Biden, but I think he got this one wrong," said Rep. Greg Stanton, D-Ariz. "This wasn’t a politically-motivated prosecution. Hunter committed felonies, and was convicted by a jury of his peers."
Jared Polis, the Democratic governor of Colorado, also criticized the decision.
"While as a father I certainly understand [Biden’s] natural desire to help his son by pardoning him, I am disappointed that he put his family ahead of the country. This is a bad precedent that could be abused by later Presidents and will sadly tarnish his reputation," Polis said in a lengthy statement.
"Hunter brought the legal trouble he faced on himself, and one can sympathize with his struggles while also acknowledging that no one is above the law, not a President and not a President’s son."
Still, other Democratic allies of the president pushed back.
"Look at the underlying facts and usual DOJ practice Governor," former Attorney General Eric Holder, who served with Biden in the Obama administration, responded to Polis on X.
In a separate post, Holder wrote, "No [U.S. attorney] would have charged this case given the underlying facts. After a 5 year investigation the facts as discovered only made that clear. Had his name been Joe Smith the resolution would have been — fundamentally and more fairly — a declination. Pardon warranted."
Rep. Glenn Ivey, D-Md., said he had "mixed views" on Biden's pardon.
Like Holder, Ivey argued that Hunter's family name was a factor in the prosecutions against him but worried it could set a precedent that Republicans could use in return.
"Even though I don't think Hunter Biden would have been prosecuted under those circumstances, a pardon at this point will be used against, I think, Democrats who are pushing to defend the Department of Justice against politicizing it, which is certainly what President Trump plans to do," Ivey told CNN on Monday morning.
"I know that there was a real strong sentiment in, you know, wanting to protect Hunter Biden from unfair prosecution. But this is going to be used against us when we're fighting the misuses that are coming from the Trump administration."
'It's a setback': Democrats criticize Biden over Hunter pardon
Democrats are signaling they are uneasy with President Biden's decision to grant a sweeping pardon for his son.
www.foxnews.com
