Poilievre calls out Jagmeet 'Sellout' Singh to end deal with Liberals

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
75,539
84,107
113
It does however sound like too much immigration.
Which is an abstract concept anyway. How much is too much?

Immigration in Canada - and Australia and New Zealand - is economically planned out by the government to compensate for a failing birth rate and aging population. So optimum levels in that sense might conflict with existing services and accommodations.

That involves a balancing of resources; but it's not "too much immigration" in the sense that a far right rioter in the UK might conceive the notion.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,274
4,461
113
He is just adjusting the levels to keep you xenophobes happy.

Why do you want to support an individual who believes that men who pay for sex are criminals and supported FREEDUM chaos twats. A lifetime arrogant politician who has already earned his golden pension.
Has Trudeau killed C-36?

As I said at the time. No matter who was in when the laws were struck down the Nordic model was going to happen. The Liberals would have just said Feminism and trafficking and done the same thing. It was a no brainer from all standpoints to the general public sentiments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,348
14,819
113
Has Trudeau killed C-36?

As I said at the time. No matter who was in when the laws were struck down the Nordic model was going to happen. The Liberals would have just said Feminism and trafficking and done the same thing. It was a no brainer from all standpoints to the general public sentiments.
It amazes me how you righties try to justify a policy brought in strictly by a conservative government which Liberals have completely ignored. Wynn scoffed at it and Justin completely ignored it. I will give Doug Ford credit for not paying any attention to it, but trying to deflect it onto the Libs is nonsense. Also keep in mind, PEE PEE was Harper's right-hand looney tune when they crafted C36. The little thingy Harper wanted to use to arrest you!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,274
4,461
113
It amazes me how you righties try to justify a policy brought in strictly by a conservative government which Liberals have completely ignored. Wynn scoffed at it and Justin completely ignored it. I will give Doug Ford credit for not paying any attention to it, but trying to deflect it onto the Libs is nonsense. Also keep in mind, PEE PEE was Harper's right-hand looney tune when they crafted C36. The little thingy Harper wanted to use to arrest you!!!
What has Trudeau done to remove it?

I didn't defect, I stated all parties would have produced something similar.

Do you really think any party would have legalized it?

And why did he go with the LEFT WING style criminalization of the Nordic model if it was right wing show?
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,348
14,819
113
What has Trudeau done to remove it?

I didn't defect, I stated all parties would have produced something similar.

Do you really think any party would have legalized it?
What has the Justin Liberal party exactly produced??????

They haven't touched it because it hasn't been taken seriously yet. After all, the Harper NeoNazis were shown the door. Let's see if Granpa Harper's nephew picks up the ball to run it across the finish line.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,348
14,819
113
Two party systems encourage a process of parties dissecting roughly 50% of the vote. In a two party system, a party might tolerate losing 55% or so of the vote for a few election cycles. You can then bet that some party leader will come along and start adapting policy at the fringes to compete for 51% of the vote.

There's also the phenomenon that some voters in the middle tend to just want to vote the party in power out of office. Obviously, the alternative in this case would be the Conservatives in a two party system . It might not be the the most well-reasoned decision, but it does happen.

Countries that have one party dominance for decades usually have lots of avoidable problems.
The problem here is the left split up the vote allowing the right to right into town. I'd like to see a merge or have another right-wing party come into the mix that garners as many seats or more than the NDP so it's a level playing field.
 

RobI

Active member
Mar 28, 2009
253
110
43
Toronto
www.toronto.xxx
WHY the fuck would Jagmeet give Pee Pee the time of day let alone listen to the twat's advice?
Yet the next day, he walked out on Trudeau like he was Mrs Trudeau: "He is bad for Canada. He was an abject failure," Singh said of Trudeau


The French guy has serious Jedi powers if he can make Jagmeet talk like a full-on Conservative :D
 

RobI

Active member
Mar 28, 2009
253
110
43
Toronto
www.toronto.xxx
I'm not upset because I know Jagmeet will just laugh it off and I know exactly what Pee Pee is up to. It's still a long way away, perhaps Liberals can pull off a Democratic-like surge in about 6 months.
Do you know WHY the Democrats pulled off a surge? Justin might be Canada's Joe Biden, but there are no donors to pull funding up here.

 

jimidean2011

Well-known member
Sep 1, 2011
2,108
1,907
113
you can have sweet dreams knowing one day the news might come out about Oboma getting massive kickbacks from green energy companies
until then try counting sheep
No way in hell. Obama would never do something like that. He's one of the few honest politician around. I wish he could have served a third term.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RZG

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,348
14,819
113
What has Trudeau done to remove it?

I didn't defect, I stated all parties would have produced something similar.

Do you really think any party would have legalized it?

And why did he go with the LEFT WING style criminalization of the Nordic model if it was right wing show?
You made a claim that every party produced something yet you can't show me what the Federal Libs produced yet you complain they haven't removed what Harper the CONSERVATIVES brought in. Why are you not blaming Harper for bringing it in instead of Justin for ignoring it and not removing it?
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,348
14,819
113
Yet the next day, he walked out on Trudeau like he was Mrs Trudeau: "He is bad for Canada. He was an abject failure," Singh said of Trudeau


The French guy has serious Jedi powers if he can make Jagmeet talk like a full-on Conservative :D
Do you know WHY the Democrats pulled off a surge? Justin might be Canada's Joe Biden, but there are no donors to pull funding up here.

Jagmeet pulling out has more to do with an upcoming byelection. Do you really think he is going to trigger an early election??? Tell me you're not that naive. Last question, who do you think Jagmeet rather work with, Justin or Piss Stain? Now if you will excuse me, I need to take a piss. It's all this PEE PEE posting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,274
4,461
113
You made a claim that every party produced something yet you can't show me what the Federal Libs produced yet you complain they haven't removed what Harper the CONSERVATIVES brought in. Why are you not blaming Harper for bringing it in instead of Justin for ignoring it and not removing it?
They weren't in power. What I'm stating is had they been in power(and it was about the timing when the original laws were struck down) they would have done the same thing.

Unless you are going to state you believe Trudeau, or any Majority Liberal government would have left prostitution in Canada fully legal. Is that your claim?
 
Toronto Escorts