so now that your worries are put to rest you can go on your merry wayYou summoned my name. I wasn't posting much but besides having men in dresses on your mind, you seem to have me on your mind to and that worries me.
so now that your worries are put to rest you can go on your merry wayYou summoned my name. I wasn't posting much but besides having men in dresses on your mind, you seem to have me on your mind to and that worries me.
I'm still concerned about you. You need to live out your fantasies man. Let it out!so now that your worries are put to rest you can go on your merry way
Oh geez, he suggested to rely on experts, OMG! NO MAN lets rely on old cranky dudes who know better. LMFAOThe Messiah has spoken
he doesn't give a shit about anybody but himself
True.you are not going to vote for him anyways
Yup.in last election 33% voted for Trudeau, 67% did not
Not with this, he isn't.most of who voted for him last time will do it again
but there are 67% left and they are not happy with the way Mr.Trudeau is running the country
Poilievre is reaching out to the 67%
See.woke politics and woke politicians are done, at least for now
they have unnecessarily pissed off too many people
I agree.Poilievre doesn't have to use "identity politics" (whatever it means) to convince a lot of Canadian voters to vote for him
Oh shit.Woke has only one purpose
it's only pathetic if you are on another side of the issueI agree.
Which is why it's so disappointing to see him doing that and you implying that "anti-woke" identity politics like this is him "reaching out to the 67%".
Oh shit.
It's worse than I thought.
How pathetic.
who can tell what will get him more votes?True.
But given his almost-inevitable victory, I would prefer if it didn't encourage Canadian politicians to think that this US-style identity politics was a good thing and important to his victory.
again, that is what you think some might disagreeNot with this, he isn't.
I disagree, we should bring it to light as much as possibleSee.
This is exactly the issue.
An obsession with "wokeness" is the last thing we need here.
are you allowed to look at him when he talks or do you have to bow your head down ?Oh geez, he suggested to rely on experts, OMG! NO MAN lets rely on old cranky dudes who know better. LMFAO
Hey at least I am not the one thinking of men in dresses all day.are you allowed to look at him when he talks or do you have to bow your head down ?![]()
not everybody has your level of political sophisticationSee.
This is exactly the issue.
An obsession with "wokeness" is the last thing we need here.
for someone who doesn't think about them you sure write about them a lotHey at least I am not the one thinking of men in dresses all day.![]()
Just trying to help you, man! I can't do anything about your age and with age comes crankiness but let's get you into a different thread to calm you down.for someone who doesn't think about them you sure write about them a lot![]()
I like this threadJust trying to help you, man! I can't do anything about your age and with age comes crankiness but let's get you into a different thread to calm you down.
If you resist the current government, why are you focusing on this issue?it's only pathetic if you are on another side of the issue
there is a limit to haw far you can push people before they resist
I do not think that it's Poilievre's fault
it's getting ugly now because there is a lot of resistance to current government
Exactly. It's just about getting votes by stoking outrage.who can tell what will get him more votes?
after all that's what it is really all about
See, there you go.I disagree, we should bring it to light as much as possible
this is the type of division this current government created
I get it.not everybody has your level of political sophistication
average voter is a fickle mistress
Conservatives already had two limp noodles as candidates (Scheer and O'Tool)
who tried to be all to all people
that didn't work
maybe a strong leader is what they need now
even if he comes across as a bigot