Hyperbole much? Their stock price is currently 59 bucks... on sept 23 of last year it was 55 bucks.
Hyperbole much? Their stock price is currently 59 bucks... on sept 23 of last year it was 55 bucks.
Jan 18 2024 it was $74Hyperbole much? Their stock price is currently 59 bucks... on sept 23 of last year it was 55 bucks.
That's a homophobic comment.You seem to know an awful lot about what gives that guy an erection Orry.
Your's is a stupid comment.That's a homophobic comment.
Jan 18 2024 it was $74
That's a homophobic comment.
That's a homophobic comment.
It was an attempt to insult Oracle (who you consider a loathsome right winger and thereby worthy of insult) by implying he knows too much about what gives another guy an erection. And how would he know so much about that? Well, by being with other guys sexually. That is clearly what you were implying.Your's is a stupid comment.
You calling it homophobic and considering a man being with another man an insult, is homophobic. You are also projecting your own reservations on others. So now it appears your's is not just a stupid comment, but also a homophobic one.Kautilya said:
You seem to know an awful lot about what gives that guy an erection
Kautilya said:
You seem to know an awful lot about what gives that guy an erection
It was an attempt to insult Oracle (who you consider a loathsome right winger and thereby worthy of insult) by implying he knows too much about what gives another guy an erection. And how would he know so much about that? Well, by being with other guys sexually. That is clearly what you were implying.
You were in the middle of a debate with him, taking shots at each other and he'd just claimed that he'd handed your ass back to you and that pissed you off.
It was a homophobic insult and cannot be interpreted any other way.
That is so cute that you think you won that exchange.
1: He is a dude, dudes know what gives dudes erections, unless he is way too young to be getting them in which case he should be banned because children don't belong on terb.
2: One can understand how equipment works without even having it. I mean you do know how periods work don't you even though you have never had one
3: If there was a flaw in his argument it is assuming the tranny was attracted to women. He could be a ghey, or one of them asexuals.
Now that was funny. And sooo very true.I rate your comeback and your hasty declaration of victory a fail. You should hang your head in shame and apologize to us for having to read this. Also if you are now unqualified from telling Norm MacDonald's professor of logic joke.
Now that is how you hand somebody's buttocks back to them.
Another lesson in Kautilya Logic. AKA Bizarro logic.You calling it homophobic and considering a man being with another man an insult, is homophobic. You are also projecting your own reservations on others. So now it appears your's is not just a stupid comment, but also a homophobic one.
Orry did not think it was insulting to claim that he knew all about what gave the guy in the pic an erection. I simply played it back to him. You calling that insulting is therefore homophobic.Another lesson in Kautilya Logic. AKA Bizarro logic.
You intentionally and undeniably wanted to insult him.
If I am wrong what does "you seem to know to know a lot about what gives a guy an erection" supposed to mean when you are attempting to insult someone else?
Right. So dudes do not know what gives other dudes an erection, because it is personal. You are a guy (I hope). I am a guy. I do not know what gives you an erection (assuming you have a dick). May be Justin Bieber does it for you. Or may be nothing does. Who knows? So that right there negates any shred of logic you thought you had in your goofy ass response and qualifies me as the single most qualified TERBite to tell Norm Macdonald's professor of logic joke. Thank you for shooting yourself in the dick (assuming you have one) and letting me point it out to you. Now it is time for you to hang your head in shame and pick up your buttocks, and the pieces of your dick you left on my floor and run along home.3: If there was a flaw in his argument it is assuming the tranny was attracted to women. He could be a ghey, or one of them asexuals.
Tell me you are butthurt after repeatedly embarrassing yourself in arguments with me, without telling me you are butthurt.
So how is this guy can't change in the "men's" change room? I feel like that's presumptive to think the men would freak out seeing him in the men's bathroom....why? does he feel uncomfortable changing in the men's bathroom?You seem to know an awful lot about what gives that guy an erection Orry.
Ass handed back to ya!
Thats a good point. I can only see 3 scenarios -So how is this guy can't change in the "men's" change room? I feel like that's presumptive to think the men would freak out seeing him in the men's bathroom....why? does he feel uncomfortable changing in the men's bathroom?
Jenesis you are clearly a women and you can support who you want but these men are not women period ! They have a clear mental illnessSo I support the trans community I feel. I am also a woman. I would have been shocked to see this person in the “woman” bathroom.
Now I can’t tell if the pic with them getting dressed shows breasts or not but that would one indicator for me. If they were trans, part of the transition is breasts but that looks more like a padded push-up bra to me.
Second is hair. I get shaving. That is an issue even with hormones (although that much is rare unless right at the start of taking hormones) but the hair makes me have pause. Most trans women I know - the first thing they do is grow out their hair because that is the first thing they can control on their own. So I don’t get the short men’s style hair cut still happening.
Looking at the pics - I get more cross- dresser vibes which is different from being trans.
I think PF needs to spend money on their facilities to be inclusive like creating a trans changing space then to make women vulnerable to predatory men. Not other trans women. True trans women are not the problem. Cis straight predatory men are the problem. So PF needs to protect both their female and trans communities by creating a third space.
We are living in some weird times for sure. lolDisabled washrooms are for a physical need for support etc.,
Gendered bathrooms is what we are talking about. The idea is that transwomen are women. Transmen are men. And they use the gendered bathroom that aligns with their gender identity. Trans safe spaces, goes against this idea and puts them in a separate "gender" category, which does not exist. That would be problematic.
The goal should be to get creepy men out of women's spaces, not keep transwomen out of women's spaces. Which is why am thinking if there should be a certain point, where a trans person should be considered "transitioned".
I mean if this transwoman below showed up in the women's washroom, no one would really have a problem with it:
View attachment 307699
It was an anti gay comment. How is it insulting to know what gives a dude an erection, even if you ignore the fact that every dude should know how his junk works and if they have received coital or coital like activity they should know how to work some elses dicks, that is why they say the shemales and gays work the dick best, because they have one and know what works from reciving the attentions.Your's is a stupid comment.
I guess in addition to not being a professor of logic, you also lack the inability to understand what you read.PS: As I said, until someone quotes you, and I get curious about what that content is, I cannot see your comments because I have your Justin Bieber worshipping, rambling, goofy ass on ignore.
I took it as him trying to insult him by implying he is a ghey.Another lesson in Kautilya Logic. AKA Bizarro logic.
You intentionally and undeniably wanted to insult him.
If I am wrong what does "you seem to know to know a lot about what gives a guy an erection" supposed to mean when you are attempting to insult someone else?
He clearly does not know when he should keep his yap shut.I took it as him trying to insult him by implying he is a ghey.
Not only are his logic and comprehension skills lacking, he is also economical with the truth.
"How" your junk works and "what" gives someone an erection are very different things. We are not talking about the science of "how" here. We are talking about the "what", which as I explained is personal to every human. If you cannot understand that basic difference, is there a point to even going further? Your argument falls apart right there.It was an anti gay comment. How is it insulting to know what gives a dude an erection, even if you ignore the fact that every dude should know how his junk works and if they have received coital or coital like activity they should know how to work some elses dicks, that is why they say the shemales and gays work the dick best, because they have one and know what works from reciving the attentions.
But even if he just really knows dick, again, why is that a problem. Coming from someone as PC as you, that is just a weird path to go down.
If you had taken your own advice, you'd have shut your trap long ago, after I exposed you in just about every discussion you had with me. Now you've ended up butthurt. Hope your rehab with NotADcotor goes well. Careful though. He is "NOT A DOCTOR!!".He clearly does not know when he should keep his yap shut.
There's an old saying:
It's better to keep your mouth shut and have everyone think you're an idiot than to open your moth and prove of all of them correct.