Tiger Williams said:
So are you saying the media are collectively involved in some kind of conspiracy to portray Blacks as being responsible for crimes they don't actually do?
Not a conspiracy perhaps but more like selective reporting for ratings purposes. Compare the number of times you see a crime reported on the news that involves a black person as opposed to a non black person. You can't tell me that the percentage of crime involving blacks that is reported on the news is the same percentage in real life. Most of us are smart enought to believe that.
We could do the same analogy with Arab's, a few of them are terrorists, so lets just ban them ALL from coming in the country and kick the ones that are already here out. Who knows, they could bomb us at any second.
Why not? That is the same thing you are supporting for Pit Bulls.
If a simple ban on Pit bulls will not stop dog attacks like you said why are we so focused on them? If the pit bulls are gone, what next? People will find other dogs to breed that are just as dangerous, it never ends. THe only way you can stop this sort of thing is to educate the public, and make the OWNERS responsible.
Again I will say that I do not personally feel this way, I am just trying to point out how flawed your logic is, you seem to be making it out as a racist remark which it is not. Only meant to prove a point.
Add to that, why don't you tell me if Breed specific banning is such a good idea why does every respected animal agency oppose it?
Even the CKC who does not even recognize pit bulls as an authentic purebread breed?