Right, absolutely nothing illegal about what he did.
He went through the process of requesting that land through the proper avenues
Right, absolutely nothing illegal about what he did.
Who the fuck said anything about illegal?Right, absolutely nothing illegal about what he did.
He went through the process of requesting that land through the proper avenues
[SIZE=+2]It's actually quite brilliant.. He talks like them, walks like them, has weaknesses like them.. And then he takes these people (who don't fully understand city politics or how to run a city) and he tells them that it's the "Elite" that are costing them money.. He tells them that he knows how to fix things for them.. He promises them shit that they want (but can't ever have) like Subways for free, and Casinos that pay hundreds of million in taxes, and less traffic for cars (without anybody having to actually stop driving their car).. When council is forced to vote down these nonsensical schemes, he just tells the people "It's not my fault, it's the 'Elites' on council that are against me"..
Public record, dude. His application to purchase the land is what triggered the investigation.Where is the proof he did that??
No conflict of interest at all for the city employees reviewing their bosses unusual request to buy a park. I am sure that they felt very secure in their jobs.Right, absolutely nothing illegal about what he did.
He went through the process of requesting that land through the proper avenues
Cry me a river Fuji.When the mayor is trying to convert public park land to his own private use, you are damned right, that sort of dirty corrupt practice needs to be thoroughly exposed.
Gain from the sale of a public asset?Who the fuck said anything about illegal?
It was disingenuous of him to quietly try to purchase public land for his own private use.. But that's not illegal.
But WHENEVER a top political figure attempts to gain from the sale of a public asset it SHOULD BE FUCKING looked into.. In this case, The Star took it upon themselves to look into.
Probably all true. Being a councillor was an easier job than perhaps running the family business, but they have enough hands there, so they put him into politics because that was their father's legacy.That's just another lie from the lying crack head.
He comes from a moneyed political family.
Ford has never had a real job, he's a career politician who's been able to fund his campaigns off his fathers business.
He appears likeable because he's a party animal, but he can't hold even a voluntary coaching job, let alone a real job.
He'd have been fired 20 times over if he was a city employee and not mayor.
Ummm... let's see...Gain from the sale of a public asset?
How could he gain anything if he wants to buy a public asset?
Yup... like locking your retarded brother in the basement with a pack of crayons when you have guests over.Probably all true. Being a councillor was an easier job than perhaps running the family business, but they have enough hands there, so they put him into politics because that was their father's legacy.
People don't care that he comes from money, because he still manages to seem "down to earth". People like him because they can relate to him. They like having somebody (who they feel) identifies with THEM in office.. Nothing more..
It's actually quite brilliant.. He talks like them, walks like them, has weaknesses like them.. And then he takes these people (who don't fully understand city politics or how to run a city) and he tells them that it's the "Elite" that are costing them money.. He tells them that he knows how to fix things for them.. He promises them shit that they want (but can't ever have) like Subways for free, and Casinos that pay hundreds of million in taxes, and less traffic for cars (without anybody having to actually stop driving their car).. When council is forced to vote down these nonsensical schemes, he just tells the people "It's not my fault, it's the 'Elites' on council that are against me"..
Stop spewing bullshit. He has one vote. It would subject to approval by council and subject to their rules and regulations and under intense scrutiny.Ummm... let's see...
How about using his position to pay a fraction of what the land is worth???
Or how about using his position to encourage a favourable outcome when in all probability any private citizen would be denied???
He's not that stupid. He's smart enough to function as a councillor and eventually get elected for Mayor. He didn't fumble at those debates (surprisingly, but my friend who's a lawyer felt they didn't attack him hard enough).Yup... like locking your retarded brother in the basement with a pack of crayons when you have guests over.
Agreed. And he completed the forms as "Rob Ford", not "Mayor Rob Ford", just like any other resident would do. Nothing illegal or corrupt about it. Followed the process like everyone else.Stop spewing bullshit. He has one vote. It would subject to approval by council and subject to their rules and regulations and under intense scrutiny.
In Ford's case "we" didn't kick him out of office, the councilors did. "We" didn't select the replacement, the councilors did. "We" didn't get a chance to vote, which is a key principle in democracy.He's not that stupid. He's smart enough to function as a councillor and eventually get elected for Mayor. He didn't fumble at those debates (surprisingly, but my friend who's a lawyer felt they didn't attack him hard enough).
Remember, there are not-so-bright bosses or people in power that throw their weight around to achieve their goals. The difference with politicians, we can kick them out of office (thank God).
He's able to increase the size of his property...?Gain from the sale of a public asset?
How could he gain anything if he wants to buy a public asset?
YES... "we" did by ELECTING those councillors into office... you idiot.In Ford's case "we" didn't kick him out of office, the councilors did. "We" didn't select the replacement, the councilors did. "We" didn't get a chance to vote, which is a key principle in democracy.
"We" better understand how our democratic rights were basically violated so that "we" don't become a communist state.
In the files of the TRCA if you want the original application he made, the report of the staff who evaluated and of the Authority who agreed with their recommendation and voted to nix the sale Rob wanted.Where is the proof he did that??
Seriously? Tell me all about how our democratic rights were violated when a bunch of councilors (who were also elected) reacted to their constituents by severely limiting the powers of an admitted drunk (who happens to be mayor)?In Ford's case "we" didn't kick him out of office, the councilors did. "We" didn't select the replacement, the councilors did. "We" didn't get a chance to vote, which is a key principle in democracy.
"We" better understand how our democratic rights were basically violated so that "we" don't become a communist state.
More twaddle. outside of a few village Town Meetings there hasn't been a democracy since Athens run the way you imagine, with the citizenry voting on everything directly. And my downtown ward alone has a bigger population than the town Pericles knew.In Ford's case "we" didn't kick him out of office, the councilors did. "We" didn't select the replacement, the councilors did. "We" didn't get a chance to vote, which is a key principle in democracy.
"We" better understand how our democratic rights were basically violated so that "we" don't become a communist state.





