if he was white he'd have been repatriated.. simple as that. If you believe he has been treated the same way a white person would be treated in the same circumstances you are utterly dillusional. In fact he has been treated more poorly they ANY of Canada's traditional allies treated their citizens in similar circumstances.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Omar Khadre
- Thread starter landscaper
- Start date
if he was white he'd have been repatriated.. simple as that. If you believe he has been treated the same way a white person would be treated in the same circumstances you are utterly dillusional. In fact he has been treated more poorly they ANY of Canada's traditional allies treated their citizens in similar circumstances.
Returning them to the country they originally came from is the obvious choice. The problem is that the original country may refuse to accept them, we have a number of criminals in cells now ordered deported but the country of origin refuses to take them back, Iran notably.
What about people who are born here? The charter does not allow for different treatment of naturalized citizens from birth citizens. Where would you send people stripped of their citizenship? It would appear the only choice would be to set them adrift on the high seas. (finally a use for the canadian navy)
There are times when the lack of universal miltary service certainly shows for the negative.There is definitely reasonable doubt. It amazes me how soldiers get all whiney.
if he was white he'd have been repatriated.. simple as that. If you believe he has been treated the same way a white person would be treated in the same circumstances you are utterly dillusional. In fact he has been treated more poorly they ANY of Canada's traditional allies treated their citizens in similar circumstances.
I dunno if it is racist, but it sure is bigoted.
There are times when the lack of Universal Miltary service certainly shows for the negative.
Everybody between 16 and 60 should be in the army, them we could rape, pillage and plunder other countris at will. Remind you of anybody?
Did not Denmark have universal service when you were that age? Did it turn you into a rapist, thief and robber?Everybody between 16 and 60 should be in the army, them we could rape, pillage and plunder other countris at will.
Did not Denmark have universal service when you were that age? Did it turn you into a rapist, thief and robber?
I was referring to the time around 1,000. In my time, in Denmark, every able male at 18 was given an intelligence test.
80-120 drafted as private
60-80 drafted as sergeant
<60 and >120 not drafted
You may draw your own conclusion as to why I was not drafted.
LOL if true, surprising that Denmark like most other militaries didn't put you into their version of a short service Commission.I was referring to the time around 1,000. In my time, in Denmark, every able male at 18 was given an intelligence test.
80-120 drafted as private
60-80 drafted as sergeant
<60 and >120 not drafted
You may draw your own conclusion as to why I was not drafted.
If you check the earlier posts I did point that fact out he is our problem for now until he renounces his citizenship, It was his mother I am interested ion removing
The mother hasn't committed any crimes.
That may or may not be true. However, in any event certainly not as blatantly as her late husband.The mother hasn't committed any crimes.
That may or may not be true. However, in any event certainly not as blatantly as her late husband.
So I'm wondering on what grounds her citizenship would be revoked--plainly she's a disagreeable person, but that doesn't seem to rise to the bar. (Especially since as of yet there is no bar to rise to.)
Please supply an example of what you are talking about, not just what you think is happening some facts would be nice.if he was white he'd have been repatriated.. simple as that. If you believe he has been treated the same way a white person would be treated in the same circumstances you are utterly dillusional. In fact he has been treated more poorly they ANY of Canada's traditional allies treated their citizens in similar circumstances.
What about people who are born here? The charter does not allow for different treatment of naturalized citizens from birth citizens. Where would you send people stripped of their citizenship? It would appear the only choice would be to set them adrift on the high seas. (finally a use for the canadian navy)
I have noted severall times in this thread that canadian born idiots are our problem until they either die or renounce there citizenship.
The mother hasn't committed any crimes.
That I am not sure about, raising money and supportiung a terrorist group comes to mind. Beyond that there are responsibilities that go along with the rights everybody screams about. Amoung them not breaking the law. As I said I don'y know if we can boot her but I would really like to try.
So I'm wondering on what grounds her citizenship would be revoked--plainly she's a disagreeable person, but that doesn't seem to rise to the bar. (Especially since as of yet there is no bar to rise to.)
The grounds for revoking at least one of the alleged Nazi guards was at least as thin, Russian documents with a picture that was questionable at best. But the fact remains there is a presedent for the reisnding of citizenship, and I would really like to see her sent somewhere.
They started the fight by murdering the 2 Afghans instead of surrendering.After the bombs were dropped they did not offer any chance to surrender and if you read the account there is a lot of killing of disabled people going on... i.e murder. Even Khadar was shot in the back when in a prone position...
After the bombs dropped there should have been nothing left and no chance for survivors.
If you can't provide a credible report supporting your claim that disabled people were murdered there, you are an idiot.
They saved Khadr's life.
They started the fight by murdering the 2 Afghans instead of surrendering.
After the bombs dropped there should have been nothing left and no chance for survivors.
If you can't provide a credible report supporting your claim that disabled people were murdered there, you are an idiot.
They saved Khadr's life.
Read the same link you posted. The shot Khadr in the back as he knelt down in a prone position... another man was lying unconsious and was shot in the head.. pretty clear in that account. Kinda shows what the US special forces are made off when the force Afghans into dangerous positions and get them shot with no back up. They easily could have had machine guns ready to provide covering fire.
Well it's shame they didn't kill the cockroach.Read the same link you posted. The shot Khadr in the back as he knelt down in a prone position... another man was lying unconsious and was shot in the head.. pretty clear in that account. Kinda shows what the US special forces are made off when the force Afghans into dangerous positions and get them shot with no back up. They easily could have had machine guns ready to provide covering fire.
I have noted severall times in this thread that canadian born idiots are our problem until they either die or renounce there citizenship.
You have, but you seem not to be able to grasp the plain fact, that so is anybody else given citizenship on basis of a truthful application.
The grounds for revoking at least one of the alleged Nazi guards was at least as thin, Russian documents with a picture that was questionable at best. But the fact remains there is a presedent for the reisnding of citizenship, and I would really like to see her sent somewhere.
The grounds for rescinding the former Nazi`s citizenship was , that he had given false statements on his application for citizenship.
The fact that Khadr had his back to them does not mean he was no longer a threat and the other guy was not unconcious.Read the same link you posted. The shot Khadr in the back as he knelt down in a prone position... another man was lying unconsious and was shot in the head.. pretty clear in that account.
There is no indication that they were complying with commands when they got shot.
You are a biased presumptuous idiot.
OC-1 reported that although he didn't hear any gunfire, but the dust being blown from an alley on the northside of the complex led him to believe the team was under fire from a shooter between the house and barn. He reported that a grenade was also "lobbed" over the wall that led to the alley and landed 30–50 metres from the alley opening. Running towards the alley to escape the grenade which he also didn't hear detonate, OC-1 fired a dozen M4 Carbine rounds into the alley as he ran past, although he couldn't see anything due to the rising dust clouds. Crouching at the southeast entrance to the alleyway, OC-1 could see a man with a holstered pistol moving on the ground next to an AK-47, with two chest wounds. From his position, OC-1 fired a single shot into the man's head, killing him.
Two soldiers kneel over the wounded Khadr.
When the dust cleared, OC-1 saw Khadr crouched on his knees facing away from the action and wounded by shrapnel that had just permanently blinded his left eye, and shot him twice in the back.
