was he being a dick? or everyone is a dick if they don't agree with your views?
Oakville teacher wears huge prosthetic breasts to shop class
- Thread starter curr3n_c1000
- Start date
Nope, wrong again. Menzies has 1st person reports of this guy's pervy behaviour. Start watching this at about 50 mins in, and he outlines the evidence he has received:
I just wasted 4:21 of my life listening to a saggy old hack pseudo journo who dyes his hair orange telling the credulous that he has "an un named source" who claims that Busty jerks off to young girls while dressed in women's clothes.
Apparently, this only happened on 1 recorded instance and the un named source just happened to be there at the time. But the un named source apparently saw an unmistakable male erection under the fake boobage and skirt as Busty was sitting - not standing - there and despite the fact that the lights were dimmed and Busty wasn't sitting close to the "un named source" - at least not that we're told.
This is about as large a turd of bullshit as I have ever smelled, Dutchie. Chapeau, mon ami! You have posted the silliest nonsense yet!!!
If they're being a dick, yes.
If someone is being a dick, then a dick they are being.
Yes, the unnamed source "just happened to be" where their own daughter was. And you find that strange? Compared to creepy Lemieux being there with no child involved and no reason to be there?
And you think hard-ons are hard to spot? Under a tight skirt?
Your judgement is simply horrible. Menzies makes MUCH more sense than you do!
I'm not going to watch the Rebel...but, I guess my question is, if this "unnamed source" witnessed someone rubbing one out in public....why the fuck didn't they call the cops? Maybe I'm missing something here.
Now, all that being said, is this person a pervert? Probably not, but that won't stop the right from smearing them. I don't really care about this story. And it seems that only Menzies does, and of course Rebel's easily triggered right-wing audience.
Of course you're missing something there, because you didn't/don't watch Rebel. The sequence of events is well explained in the video. Lemieux was confronted by parents and high-tailed it out of there.
WTF? If "all that being said" includes watching little girls and getting sexually aroused - Yes - THAT MAKES HIM A PERVERT!
I say again: if I saw a dude rubbing one out while looking at children, I think confronting them would be the first step, followed by a quick call to the cops? I mean, what would you do, just let them leave???
So, while you're willing to take a Menzies unnamed source at face value...I am more skeptical. Did it happen as they describe? Sure, it's possible. But I also know that there is a hard on of hate for this person. And if these "parents" were so concerned, why didn't they call the police. I just want you to think about the credibility that Rebel "News" has. They have a long history of playing fast and loose with facts. Remember the Quebec City mosque shooting? They promoted a conspiracy theory that the shooter was a muslim for a few days, even after police said who the shooter was.
The bottom line is this: we don't know enough about this person. There is a lot of hate and anger about them (from both sides of the political spectrum), and we don't know what motivates them. Are they legit trans? Are they trying to game the system? Is this a misguided and bizarre protests? Who knows. But this person has been tagged a pervert by many before this alleged incident. So, it doesn't take a big leap to have an unnamed person claim they did something perverted.
One, this happened before Lemieux was famous. Perhaps, at the time, the parents didn't know who he was. I don't find it surprising or unusual that no one attempted a citizen's arrest when Lemieux made a swift bee-line for the door.
You NEVER WILL know enough about this person based on the efforts of the school board or the mainstream media. Luckily, there are news outlets like Rebel that will do the job that these others should be doing.
Umm, I'm pretty sure that Busty became famous once he started wearing women's clothes and the prosthetics to class. There has been absolutely no evidence of him dressing up before his games so claims that this happened before that makes the 'source' even more sketchy.
And sorry but anyone with a slight bit of sense would at least have called the cops. The fact that the 'source' witnessed a potential sex crime and didn't report it makes them a part of the problem.
An oxymoron.
Right.
It would make him a pervert who is into little girls.
But that isn't what this reporter is claiming - he is saying Lemieux is a pervert who is turned on by wearing women's clothes.
Those are two different things.
