Obsession Massage

Norwegian ruling party votes to ban circumcision for men under 16 years old

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,624
2,963
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Newborns get ears pierced all the time. Don't even need to be a doctor. Most stores wait for 3 months but certainly not abuse at any age.

And correct me if I am wrong. But is the foreskin that is actually highly sensitive or is the head of the penis that it covers????
The foreskin has 20,000 nerve endings it. protect the glans from outside rubbing and abrasions. the glans is sensitive when it is protected by the foreskin.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,665
21
38
Dan, you do realize you are trying to talk logic and reason to a confirmed liberal lefty. You will have more success talking to a ............................
Liberals do share a lot with nutty religious fanatics. They both think they're right just because. Belief over reason. Tradition over reason. Then they have the audacity to cast the logician as the racist, the hater of freedoms.
 

italianguy74

New member
Apr 3, 2011
1,798
1
0
GTA
You can have the opinion that it sounds the same to you, but factually that is incorrect.

Scalpels are used in my ways and not are are surgical.




Newborns get ears pierced all the time. Don't even need to be a doctor. Most stores wait for 3 months but certainly not abuse at any age.

And correct me if I am wrong. But is the foreskin that is actually highly sensitive or is the head of the penis that it covers????
If there were large blood vessles inside the ear lobes i think piercing a babys ears would be banned. But it is relatively safe aside from the fact that it is not the childs choice to have that done either.

The head is more sensative but a foreskin is still highly sensitive compared to other body parts, we can feel even the slightest breezes of air when our fly is down. There are many large blood vessels that run all the way to the end that get severed, some vessles as large as the vessels inside the wrist. On a level of pain I would say it would be far less painful to have both my earlobes snipped off than be circumcised without anesthesia.

To describe it to guys that are cut it has around the same sensation as the scrotum.
 

SkyRider

Banned
Mar 31, 2009
17,550
2
0
I agree that it will be a long time before a ban comes to America. But Europe may be another tale.
My friends have gone to nude beaches in Europe and uncut among males and pubic hair among women is the most common by far (cut and shaved are rare). Apparently, not many Jews or Muslims go nude on those beaches.
 

spraggamuffin

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2006
3,291
161
63
the Scandinavian women don't need wrinkle creams etc.
But in other parts of the world baby foreskin derived antiwrinkle treatments are some of the most successful.
So there goes a highly profitable industry.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,624
2,963
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Circumcision and Voilence is correlated

http://www.salem-news.com/articles/august312012/circumcision-violence-rm.php


Original FBI’s Criminal Profilers who led the Behavioral Science Unit in Quantico, Virginia know circumcision is a factor in some serial killings and partly responsible for America’s generalized asocial violence.



It has been inferred Robert Ressler, in an off the record comment when interviewed by Mothering Magazine’s web-editor, related the fact that the FBI realizes circumcision is a factor in violence. He explained they do not mentioned this because they would be considered raving lunatics and lose their jobs. Robert Ressler coined the term Serial Killer.

This attitude pervades throughout Law Enforcement from the U.S, Department of Justice down to local Sheriff Departments and Child Protective Services. Many have no clue, the same as the parents who are Conned into the ritual. The Con is the criminal Approach used to lure victims.

In Norway, the only country that records the circumcision status of rapists, 2% of the population are circumcised and commit more than 80% of their rapes. And, since 1991 almost all wars involved one circumcised country with some conflicts between both factions being circumcised. This includes all USA conflicts since Vietnam.

No other statistical records are kept regarding the individual and social percentile circumcision status of serial killers or rapists. Yet, over 50% of rapes in Sweden are perpetrated by the minority of men who belong to circumcising cultures. Circumcision status may factor highly in the USA’s highest of all other country’s incarceration rate to population.



Perversion and Circumcision

http://www.mrtao.com/perverteco_kaj_cirkumcido.htm


1. Whatever we do to children, they will do back to society

2. The earlier we abuse children, the worse and more irreversible the damage done to them is.

Consider what radically different paths humans can take, depending on their early experiences


http://intactnews.org/node/131/1316710012/study-links-circumcision-personality-trait-disorder
Study Links Circumcision to Personality Trait Disorder

Researchers find circumcised men have higher alexithymia scores than intact men. Alexithymia is the inability to process emotions.
 

SkyRider

Banned
Mar 31, 2009
17,550
2
0
On the other side of the coin, I noticed (not that I looked) some women tattoo and/or pierce their privates. Also, one dancer had her labia minora reduced because they were "too big", even had it covered by OHIP (because mental distress).
 

PhoenixHouse

Durham's Adult Fun House
Some obvious differences:

-If you remove the earring, the miniature hole of skin grows back on its own.
-Ears are not a significant sex organ

I was not commenting on the difference between the two.

I was addressing his comments regarding it being abuse for ear piercing.

Clearly people are smart enough to know difference between ears and sex organs.



To those that shared the foreskin facts - Thanks. Was interesting to know.
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,901
3,005
113
Liberals do share a lot with nutty religious fanatics. They both think they're right just because. Belief over reason. Tradition over reason. Then they have the audacity to cast the logician as the racist, the hater of freedoms.
Because your hero Trump is so logical and reasoned....LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,665
21
38

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,665
21
38
Because your hero Trump is so logical and reasoned....LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Stay on topic, silly liberal.
 

HobbyHorse

Active member
Nov 14, 2009
805
81
28
In my view the Norwegians are savages. They eat fish balls. Bigtime drunks. They avoid physical contact at all costs... don't even touch when dancing. Showing emotion is against all social norms. Cold, cold people who allowed their economy to be ruined by oil. Soon to go the way of Venezuela ( with Canada close behind).
And now this!
 

Blue-Spheroid

A little underutilized
Jun 30, 2007
3,436
5
0
Bloor and Sleazy
those health advantages are excuses and have been debunked
No they have not. You probably believe that vaccination causes autism too.

No one has suggested that circumcision be mandatory but, given that it's a procedure no more risky than a body piercing, why don't we all mind our own business and let parents choose if they want to circumcise their boys or expose them to health risks in the future. Same applies to families who pierce their children's ears in infancy; you may not see the value but it's not your call.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,624
2,963
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
No they have not. You probably believe that vaccination causes autism too.

No one has suggested that circumcision be mandatory but, given that it's a procedure no more risky than a body piercing, why don't we all mind our own business and let parents choose if they want to circumcise their boys or expose them to health risks in the future. Same applies to families who pierce their children's ears in infancy; you may not see the value but it's not your call.
vaccinations are not the same as circumcision vaccinations are over 98% effective in India vaccines wiped out smallpox

defending the right of male infants to have their genitals cut against their will is everybody's business

the studies claiming benefits of circumcision are flawed i posted then here before

an example is african studies claiming to reduce getting HIV by 60% it is flawed because the group that get cut are told to wait until they are healed and are given condoms

in the U.S.A 80% of men are cut but they have the Highest rates of HIV/STD rates in the first world. uncut Europeans have lower STD rates
 

lenny2

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2012
3,572
730
113
in the U.S.A 80% of men are cut but they have the Highest rates of HIV/STD rates in the first world. uncut Europeans have lower STD rates
That info, even if true, proves nothing.

Those claims don't help the case against circumcision in the least.

I question if it would even qualify as legitimate evidence in a court of law.

Your statement above does not rule out the possibility that USA STI rates would be even higher if men were not circumcised.

Europeans tend to have higher immunity to some diseases, including HIV, than those in the USA. Due to their DNA.

In a number of countries without such immunity, but widespread circumcision, STI rates are as low or lower than Europe.

STI rates tend to be higher where homosexual sex & intravenous drug use is widespread (e.g. USA), rather than in countries where such is less common (e.g. some European countries).

Moreover, AFAIK, there is no evidence that circumcision is effective in protecting against anal sex. At least where HIV is concerned.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,624
2,963
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
That info, even if true, proves nothing.

Those claims don't help the case against circumcision in the least.

I question if it would even qualify as legitimate evidence in a court of law.

Your statement above does not rule out the possibility that USA STI rates would be even higher if men were not circumcised.

Europeans tend to have higher immunity to some diseases, including HIV, than those in the USA. Due to their DNA.

In a number of countries without such immunity, but widespread circumcision, STI rates are as low or lower than Europe.

STI rates tend to be higher where homosexual sex & intravenous drug use is widespread (e.g. USA), rather than in countries where such is less common (e.g. some European countries).

Moreover, AFAIK, there is no evidence that circumcision is effective in protecting against anal sex. At least where HIV is concerned.


www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/CR22/CR22.pdf

"There appears to be no clear pattern of association between male circumcision and HIV prevalence. In 8 of 18 countries with data, as expected, HIV prevalence is lower among circumcised men, while in the remaining 10 countries HIV prevalence is higher among circumcised men".


More than 70% of the 87,710 HIV/AIDS sufferers in the country are Muslims, Malaysian AIDS Council vice-president Datuk Zaman Khan said.

http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nati...fferers-in-malaysia-are-muslims-aids-council/
in malaysia muslims circumcise for religious reasons

https://www.poz.com/article/Malaysian-Muslim-AIDS-18548-8052
 
Toronto Escorts