Toronto Passions

Most recent articles on prostitution related laws, opinions, comments

escapefromstress

New member
Mar 15, 2012
944
0
0
Sex-trade workers lured by big money in Alberta: police


EDMONTON - Just like everyone else, sex-trade workers are travelling across the country to earn big money in Alberta.

All but one of 16 prostitutes interviewed by Edmonton police recently as part of a human-trafficking investigation had arrived from outside Alberta, mostly from Toronto and Montreal. “There is a pattern where women are coming to an oil-rich province chasing the money, and we are seeing more and more of that,” Det. David Schening, with the Edmonton police’s vice unit, said Tuesday.

Participating in a nationwide undercover probe called Operation Northern Spotlight, Edmonton detectives contacted sex-trade workers by responding to advertisements on the Internet and then offered intervention and exit strategies instead of arresting them. A secondary goal was determining if they were being forced to work for somebody else.

“The objective is not just enforcement; first and foremost, it is the safety of these women, and then trying to see if we can identify their handlers,” Schening said. “No one acknowledged that was happening, but I saw a lot of reluctance and guarded answers. “I believe there is an underlying reason why they are here.”

None of the sex-trade workers in Edmonton contacted as part of the investigation was underage, although police elsewhere found minors had been threatened with violence, extortion and drug dependency, among other forms of coercion. The youngest, a 12-year-old girl, was taken into protective custody in Winnipeg.

More than 300 women were interviewed by police from 26 departments nationwide, with nine arrests and 33 charges laid, including forcible confinement, making and distributing child pornography, assault and trafficking in persons.

Launched in January, the operation focused on hotels and motels along thoroughfares in 30 cities and towns, Edmonton and Calgary included. A two-day hotel sting was carried out in Edmonton on Oct. 1-2.

“These are somebody’s daughters and family members who are coming here to engage in a dangerous business,” Schening said. “As a father and a grandfather, there is nothing I would like less than to find them as a victim at a crime scene.”

Schening said detectives tried to leave the sex-trade workers with the understanding that they could reach out to police any time they needed help. “I think they are making a circuit, going from city to city,” he said. “They was no shortage of women responding to our calls.”

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/trade...342/story.html
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,117
17,180
113
Sex-trade workers lured by big money in Alberta: police


EDMONTON - Just like everyone else, sex-trade workers are travelling across the country to earn big money in Alberta.

All but one of 16 prostitutes interviewed by Edmonton police recently as part of a human-trafficking investigation had arrived from outside Alberta, mostly from Toronto and Montreal. “There is a pattern where women are coming to an oil-rich province chasing the money, and we are seeing more and more of that,” Det. David Schening, with the Edmonton police’s vice unit, said Tuesday.

Participating in a nationwide undercover probe called Operation Northern Spotlight, Edmonton detectives contacted sex-trade workers by responding to advertisements on the Internet and then offered intervention and exit strategies instead of arresting them. A secondary goal was determining if they were being forced to work for somebody else.

“The objective is not just enforcement; first and foremost, it is the safety of these women, and then trying to see if we can identify their handlers,” Schening said. “No one acknowledged that was happening, but I saw a lot of reluctance and guarded answers. “I believe there is an underlying reason why they are here.”

None of the sex-trade workers in Edmonton contacted as part of the investigation was underage, although police elsewhere found minors had been threatened with violence, extortion and drug dependency, among other forms of coercion. The youngest, a 12-year-old girl, was taken into protective custody in Winnipeg.

More than 300 women were interviewed by police from 26 departments nationwide, with nine arrests and 33 charges laid, including forcible confinement, making and distributing child pornography, assault and trafficking in persons.

Launched in January, the operation focused on hotels and motels along thoroughfares in 30 cities and towns, Edmonton and Calgary included. A two-day hotel sting was carried out in Edmonton on Oct. 1-2.

“These are somebody’s daughters and family members who are coming here to engage in a dangerous business,” Schening said. “As a father and a grandfather, there is nothing I would like less than to find them as a victim at a crime scene.”

Schening said detectives tried to leave the sex-trade workers with the understanding that they could reach out to police any time they needed help. “I think they are making a circuit, going from city to city,” he said. “They was no shortage of women responding to our calls.”

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/trade...342/story.html
This is only the beginning. The intimidation of the ladies is only starting up, as the bill takes hold more and more of this will be happening.
 

escapefromstress

New member
Mar 15, 2012
944
0
0

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,335
13
38
The wording is scary but practically-speaking, I can't see the law being enforced to the point that they shut down MPs or eliminate indies.
 

escapefromstress

New member
Mar 15, 2012
944
0
0
This was just posted by a perb member:

Here is a list of all the Conservative email addresses. The link leads to a string that I have created so that you can copy and paste it into your email and send a mass email to all the Conservative MP's. If anyone wants the other parties done please let me know, and I will do it.

I am going to compose and send my own mass email now.

http://www.fileswap.com/dl/1FyayL4ku...mails.pdf.html


Yes Diane Ablonczy diane.ablonczy@parl.gc.ca
Yes Eve Adams Eve.Adams@parl.gc.ca
Yes Mark Adler Mark.Adler@parl.gc.ca
Yes Leona Aglukkaq leona.aglukkaq@parl.gc.ca
Yes Dan Albas Dan.Albas@parl.gc.ca
Yes Harold Albrecht harold.albrecht@parl.gc.ca
Yes Chris Alexander Chris.Alexander@parl.gc.ca
Yes Mike Allen mike.allen@parl.gc.ca
Yes Dean Allison dean.allison@parl.gc.ca
Yes Stella Ambler Stella.Ambler@parl.gc.ca
Yes Rona Ambrose rona.ambrose@parl.gc.ca
Yes Rob Anders rob.anders@parl.gc.ca
Yes David Anderson david.anderson@parl.gc.ca
Yes Scott Armstrong scott.armstrong@parl.gc.ca
Didn't vote Keith Ashfield keith.ashfield@parl.gc.ca
Yes Jay Aspin Jay.Aspin@parl.gc.ca
Yes John Baird john.baird@parl.gc.ca
Yes John Barlow John.Barlow@parl.gc.ca
Yes Joyce Bateman Joyce.Bateman@parl.gc.ca
Yes Leon Benoit leon.benoit@parl.gc.ca
Yes Candice Bergen candice.bergen@parl.gc.ca
Yes Maxime Bernier www.maximebernier.com/en
Yes James Bezan www.jamesbezan.com
Yes Steven Blaney www.stevenblaney.ca f
Yes Kelly Block kelly.block@parl.gc.ca
Yes Ray Boughen ray.boughen@parl.gc.ca
Yes Peter Braid peter.braid@parl.gc.ca
Yes Garry Breitkreuz www.garrybreitkreuz.com
Yes Gord Brown gord.brown@parl.gc.ca
Yes Lois Brown lois.brown@parl.gc.ca
Yes Patrick Brown patrick.brown@parl.gc.ca
Yes Rod Bruinooge rod.bruinooge@parl.gc.ca
Yes Brad Butt Brad.Butt@parl.gc.ca
Yes Paul Calandra paul.calandra@parl.gc.ca
Yes Blaine Calkins blaine.calkins@parl.gc.ca
Yes Ron Cannan ron.cannan@parl.gc.ca
Yes John Carmichael John.Carmichael@parl.gc.ca
Yes Colin Carrie colin.carrie@parl.gc.ca
Yes Corneliu Chisu www.corneliuchisu.ca
Yes Michael Chong michael.chong@parl.gc.ca
Yes Rob Clarke rob.clarke@parl.gc.ca
Yes Tony Clement tony.clement@parl.gc.ca
Yes Joan Crockatt Joan.Crockatt@parl.gc.ca
Yes Joe Daniel Joe.Daniel@parl.gc.ca
Yes Patricia Davidson pat.davidson@parl.gc.ca
Yes Bob Dechert bob.dechert@parl.gc.ca
Yes Barry Devolin barry.devolin@parl.gc.ca
Yes Earl Dreeshen earl.dreeshen@parl.gc.ca
Yes John Duncan john.duncan@parl.gc.ca
Yes Rick Dykstra rick.dykstra@parl.gc.ca
Yes Ted Falk Ted.Falk@parl.gc.ca
Yes Julian Fantino julian.fantino@parl.gc.ca
Yes Ed Fast ed.fast@parl.gc.ca
Yes Kerry-Lynne Findlay Kerry-Lynne.Findlay@parl.gc.ca
Yes Diane Finley diane.finley@parl.gc.ca
Yes Steven Fletcher www.stevenfletcher.com
Yes Royal Galipeau royal.galipeau@parl.gc.ca
Yes Cheryl Gallant cheryl.gallant@parl.gc.ca
Yes Parm Gill www.parmgill.ca
Yes Shelly Glover shelly.glover@parl.gc.ca
Yes Robert Goguen Robert.Goguen@parl.gc.ca
Yes Peter Goldring peter.goldring@parl.gc.ca
Yes Gary Goodyear gary.goodyear@parl.gc.ca
Yes Bal Gosal Bal.Gosal@parl.gc.ca
Yes Jacques Gourde jacques.gourde@parl.gc.ca
Yes Nina Grewal nina.grewal@parl.gc.ca
Yes Stephen Harper stephen.harper@parl.gc.ca
Yes Dick Harris richard.harris@parl.gc.ca
Yes Laurie Hawn laurie.hawn@parl.gc.ca
Yes Bryan Hayes Bryan.Hayes@parl.gc.ca
Didn't vote Russ Hiebert russ.hiebert@parl.gc.ca
Yes Jim Hillyer Jim.Hillyer@parl.gc.ca
Yes Randy Hoback randy.hoback@parl.gc.ca
Yes Ed Holder ed.holder@parl.gc.ca
Yes Roxanne James Roxanne.James@parl.gc.ca
Yes Randy Kamp www.randykamp.com
Yes Gerald Keddy www.geraldkeddymp.ca
Yes Jason Kenney jason.kenney@parl.gc.ca
Yes Peter Kent peter.kent@parl.gc.ca
Yes Greg Kerr greg.kerr@parl.gc.ca
Yes Ed Komarnicki ed.komarnicki@parl.gc.ca
Yes Daryl Kramp daryl.kramp@parl.gc.ca
Yes Mike Lake mike.lake@parl.gc.ca
Yes Guy Lauzon guy.lauzon@parl.gc.ca
Yes Denis Lebel denis.lebel@parl.gc.ca
Yes Ryan Leef Ryan.Leef@parl.gc.ca
Yes Kellie Leitch Kellie.Leitch@parl.gc.ca
Yes ************ Lemieux ************.lemieux@parl.gc.ca
Yes Chungsen Leung Chungsen.Leung@parl.gc.ca
Yes Wladyslaw Lizon Wladyslaw.Lizon@parl.gc.ca
Yes Ben Lobb ben.lobb@parl.gc.ca
Yes Tom Lukiwski tom.lukiwski@parl.gc.ca
Yes James Lunney james.lunney@parl.gc.ca
Yes Peter MacKay peter.mackay@parl.gc.ca
Yes Dave MacKenzie dave.mackenzie@parl.gc.ca
Yes Larry Maguire Larry.Maguire@parl.gc.ca
Yes Colin Mayes colin.mayes@parl.gc.ca
Yes Phil McColeman phil.mccoleman@parl.gc.ca
Yes Cathy McLeod cathy.mcleod@parl.gc.ca
Yes Costas Menegakis Costas.Menegakis@parl.gc.ca
Yes Larry Miller larry.miller@parl.gc.ca
Yes James Moore james.moore@parl.gc.ca
Yes Rob Moore rob.moore@parl.gc.ca
Yes Rob Nicholson rob.nicholson@parl.gc.ca
Yes Rick Norlock rick.norlock@parl.gc.ca
Yes Deepak Obhrai deepak.obhrai@parl.gc.ca
Yes Gordon O'Connor gordon.oconnor@parl.gc.ca
Yes Joe Oliver Joe.Oliver@parl.gc.ca
Yes Tilly O'Neill-Gordon tilly.oneillgordon@parl.gc.ca
Yes Ted Opitz Ted.Opitz@parl.gc.ca
Yes Erin O'Toole Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca
Yes Christian Paradis christian.paradis@parl.gc.ca
Yes LaVar Payne lavar.payne@parl.gc.ca
Yes ************ Poilievre ************.poilievre@parl.gc.ca
Didn't vote Joe Preston Elgin—Middlesex—London
Yes Lisa Raitt lisa.raitt@parl.gc.ca
Yes James Rajotte james.rajotte@parl.gc.ca
Didn't vote Scott Reid scott.reid@parl.gc.ca
Yes Michelle Rempel Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca
Yes Blake Richards blake.richards@parl.gc.ca
Yes Greg Rickford greg.rickford@parl.gc.ca
Yes Gerry Ritz gerry.ritz@parl.gc.ca
Didn't vote Andrew Saxton andrew.saxton@parl.gc.ca
Didn't vote Andrew Scheer andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca
Yes Gary Schellenberger gary.schellenberger@parl.gc.ca
Didn't vote Kyle Seeback Kyle.Seeback@parl.gc.ca
Yes Gail Shea gail.shea@parl.gc.ca
Yes Bev Shipley bev.shipley@parl.gc.ca
Yes Devinder Shory devinder.shory@parl.gc.ca
Yes Joy Smith joy.smith@parl.gc.ca
Yes Robert Sopuck robert.sopuck@parl.gc.ca
Yes Kevin Sorenson kevin.sorenson@parl.gc.ca
Yes Bruce Stanton bruce.stanton@parl.gc.ca
Yes Brian Storseth brian.storseth@parl.gc.ca
Yes Mark Strahl Mark.Strahl@parl.gc.ca
Yes David Sweet david.sweet@parl.gc.ca
Yes David Tilson david.tilson@parl.gc.ca
Yes Lawrence Toet Lawrence.Toet@parl.gc.ca
Yes Bradley Trost brad.trost@parl.gc.ca
Yes Bernard Trottier Bernard.Trottier@parl.gc.ca
Yes Susan Truppe Susan.Truppe@parl.gc.ca
Yes Tim Uppal tim.uppal@parl.gc.ca
Yes Bernard Valcourt Bernard.Valcourt@parl.gc.ca
Yes Dave Van Kesteren dave.vankesteren@parl.gc.ca
Yes Peter Van Loan peter.vanloan@parl.gc.ca
Yes Maurice Vellacott maurice.vellacott@parl.gc.ca
Yes Mike Wallace mike.wallace@parl.gc.ca
Yes Mark Warawa mark.warawa@parl.gc.ca
Yes Chris Warkentin chris.warkentin@parl.gc.ca
Yes Jeff Watson jeff.watson@parl.gc.ca
Yes John Weston john.weston@parl.gc.ca
Yes Rodney Weston rodney.weston@parl.gc.ca
Yes David Wilks David.Wilks@parl.gc.ca
Yes John Williamson John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca
Yes Alice Wong alice.wong@parl.gc.ca
Yes Stephen Woodworth stephen.woodworth@parl.gc.ca
Yes Lynne Yelich lynne.yelich@parl.gc.ca
Yes Wai Young terence.young@parl.gc.ca
Yes Terence Young Wai.Young@parl.gc.ca
Yes David Yurdiga David.Yurdiga@parl.gc.ca
Yes Bob Zimmer Bob.Zimmer@parl.gc.ca

http://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread...s-on-Bill-C-36&p=1554037&posted=1#post1554037
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,335
13
38
Sarah,

Isn't it too late to appeal to MPs in the HOC? Thank you for the email addy info.
 

MPAsquared

www.musemassagespa.com
Canada’s new legislation cannot look like Bill C-36

http://www.hilltimes.com/opinion-pi...-legislation-cannot-look-like-bill-c-36/39811

By SANDEEP PRASAD
Published: Monday, 10/06/2014 12:00 am EDT

Full text retrieved through the Facebook page of the Canadian Alliance for Sex Work Law Reform: https://www.facebook.com/sexworklawreform

Canada’s new legislation must guarantee sex workers’ human rights to safe working conditions, to barrier-free access to comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services and information, and to live without fear of violence, stigma, or discrimination.

Not unlike the rest of the country, Action Canada for Population and Development (ACPD) has closely watched the federal government’s response to the Supreme Court of Canada’s Bedford case—which struck down outdated sex work laws last December—and the subsequent introduction of Bill C-36 by Justice Minister Peter MacKay this past June.

December’s unanimous Supreme Court ruling put on record that criminal laws prohibiting aspects of prostitution increase harm to sex workers themselves, a position supported by decades of research by academics, governments, and UN bodies, including the World Health Organization and UNAIDS, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health, and the Global Commission on HIV and the Law.

Still, Bill C-36 proposes a model that criminalizes the purchase of sex, communicating for the purpose of purchasing or selling sex, gaining material benefit from sex work, advertising sexual services, and effectively prohibits indoor sex work.

Such prohibitions have been demonstrated to have negative consequences.

And as the political process unfolds, evidence continues to grow. A special issue of The Lancet released at the July 2014 International AIDS Conference and a new study published in the prestigious British Medical Journal (BMJ), Open, demonstrated the negative impact criminalizing clients has on sex workers. Last week, a first-of-its-kind study, Understanding sex work: a health research and community partnership, found that criminalizing sex work, fully or in part, forces sex workers—especially those with limited access to resources and support—to work in dangerous conditions, and leaves them without the protective benefit of labour or health standards.

Bill C-36 would perpetuate stigma and discrimination among sex workers who may fear legal consequences or harassment at the hands of health professionals, making it more difficult for them to access essential health services and creating barriers to HIV and STI testing, appropriate treatment, care, and support.

Where sex workers or their clients fear police detection and legal repercussions, it becomes demonstrably harder to rely on public health services, to negotiate safer conditions and consistent condom use, and prevent unwanted pregnancies and the transmission of STIs, including HIV. In such cases, sex workers have documented having their condoms confiscated by police, who may use those condoms as evidence of criminal activity, forcing some sex workers to forgo condoms for fear of violence or arrest.

Bill C-36 is further problematic in that it upholds the misconception that women are inherently vulnerable or in need of protection. In doing so, it fails to address violence and exploitation in the sex industry and our broader community, or improve access to health and support services for those who need it most. Rather than safeguarding the rights of sex workers, criminalizing sex work puts sex workers who cannot or do not want to exit the trade and whose income depends on it at greater risk of experiencing negative health outcomes, violence, stigma, and dangerous working conditions.

Organizations like ACPD work at the national and global level to protect and promote people’s rights to bodily autonomy, ensuring that all people have the ability to have control over and decide freely on matters relating to their own sexuality; these rights are strongly linked to better health outcomes for individuals and communities. This issue is no different.

Many had high hopes that following the Bedford decision our government would ensure that new legislation on prostitution would be evidence-based and prioritize the health and well-being of sex workers. Despite the Supreme Court’s condemnation of Canada’s existing prostitution laws, Bill C-36 offers an even more restrictive legal regime, which will continue or worsen conditions for sex workers leading to further violations of their human rights. Our gaze is now turned to the House of Commons as they set to vote on Bill C-36 last week.

Canada has the opportunity to join other governments, including New Zealand, in establishing a legal framework that safeguards the rights of sex workers.

Canada must not only rely on research recommendations from experts that include the World Health Organization and UNAIDS, but also recognize the legally binding international human rights instruments Canada is obligated to uphold.

The Supreme Court has made it clear that our government has an obligation to respect and protect the human rights of sex workers. Canada’s new legislation must guarantee their human rights to safe working conditions, to barrier-free access to comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services and information, and to live without fear of violence, stigma, or discrimination.

Canada’s new legislation cannot look like Bill C-36.

Sandeep Prasad is an Ottawa-based lawyer and activist who has worked since January 2011 as the executive director of Action Canada for Population and Development (ACPD), a human rights organization working within Canada and internationally on issues of reproductive and sexual rights and health.
This stood out to me: "Canada must not only rely on research recommendations from experts that include the World Health Organization and UNAIDS, but also recognize the legally binding international human rights instruments Canada is obligated to uphold. "

Could someone (bedford, a sex worker, a client, me, etc) not take this to international human rights organizations like the UN? Could they step in & stop this bill, provided there is proof of human rights violations? Does anyone know how that process works?
 

MPAsquared

www.musemassagespa.com
Too late , it passed the house of commons and now in senate. The MPs have no longer any control on it, it's in the hands of senators now
Yup. But folks should write the Senators!!!!
 

MPAsquared

www.musemassagespa.com
I'd start here:

http://www.acpd.ca/index.php/contact-us

Action Canada for Population and Development (ACPD) has closely watched the federal government’s response to the Supreme Court of Canada’s Bedford case—which struck down outdated sex work laws last December—and the subsequent introduction of Bill C-36 by Justice Minister Peter MacKay this past June.
Organizations like ACPD work at the national and global level to protect and promote people’s rights to bodily autonomy, ensuring that all people have the ability to have control over and decide freely on matters relating to their own sexuality; these rights are strongly linked to better health outcomes for individuals and communities. This issue is no different.


:)
Have these folks testified at any of the bill hearings? All these groups names have become mumble-jumbled in my head lol.
 

Siocnarf

New member
Aug 14, 2014
358
0
0
No, unfortunately. Last thing the Cons would have wanted is someone coming and telling them that they were in breach of the UN's Human Rights Charter.
I'm pretty sure some other witnesses have mentioned that fact. Everyone tells the Cons they are in breach of their own Charter and they don't care, so I don't think they care about the UN charter.

The USA are very influent at discouraging lesser countries from decriminalizing. Between the US and the UN I have no illusion which one Harper would listen to.
 

MPAsquared

www.musemassagespa.com
I sure don't remember seeing them on any witness lists. I could be mistaken of course. Where the hell were these organizations a few months ago?
Right! Well, maybe the UN is where the fight should aim!

No, unfortunately. Last thing the Cons would have wanted is someone coming and telling them that they were in breach of the UN's Human Rights Charter.
Hmmm. I'm not surprised. But perhaps we're onto something here!
 

stay

New member
May 21, 2013
905
2
0
judge's laughing
Right! Well, maybe the UN is where the fight should aim!



Hmmm. I'm not surprised. But perhaps we're onto something here!
You have to stand in line behind the other groups that have taken Canada to the UN court and got nowhere.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,309
2,786
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Australian woman at centre of false sex trafficking claims in Ireland arrested in Calgary

An Australian woman who garnered international attention last year after duping Irish authorities into thinking she was a teenage sex-trafficking victim has shown up in Calgary and is alleged to have made similar claims.

Samantha Azzopardi, 26, who was found wandering the streets of Dublin last fall, led Irish police to believe that she was a 14-or 15-year-old sex-trafficking victim from eastern Europe, according to local media accounts.

Because she only communicated through drawings, Irish police took the unprecedented step of getting a court to authorize the release of her photo around the world to help identify her. That's when they learned she was an Australian woman with a history of fraud-related charges and 40 aliases.

Now, the woman — described as a "Walter Mitty-like con artist" by Irish media — has shown up in Alberta and is accused of making similar allegations of abuse.

Calgary police said a woman walked into a city health centre on Sept. 16 claiming that her name was Aurora Hepburn, that she was 14 and that she had been the victim of an abduction, sexual assault and torture.

"For several weeks, investigators and health-care workers spent countless hours working with the alleged victim to establish the extent of her abuse and provide services for her recovery," Calgary police said in a news release.

But this month, Calgary police became suspicious after learning of a similar case that had been investigated by Irish police last year that turned out to be fake.

"After liaising with the Garda (Irish national police), it was determined the woman in Calgary was indeed believed one and the same," the police statement said.


http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/a...rafficking+claims+Ireland/10267012/story.html
 

wilbur

Active member
Jan 19, 2004
2,079
0
36
So let me get this all straight. This government claims to be concerned with the safety and well being of women pulled into the industry and abused therein. So they make pimping legal... huh? Why was there no law put in place to address pimping? The living off the avails was an overbroad law, and it was rightly struck down, but I am surprised the Harper government didn't put something in its place to go after pimps with.
Pimping is and will be illegal. In fact, a 'boyfriend' of the SP is considered a pimp unless proved otherwise...... another charter challenge in the future.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts