On a lighter note, how many current/future laws are broken here. http://www.owensoundsuntimes.com/2014/05/12/popularity-gets-teachers-goat
http://www.straight.com/news/553446...ejects-mps-suggestion-clients-can-be-targeted
A VANCOUVER LAWYER who represented sex workers before the Supreme Court of Canada has poured cold water on the idea of the federal government targeting the buyers of sex.
Elin Sigurdson told the Georgia Straight by phone that the Nordic model presents a model of "asymetrical criminalization".
She said that this approach—which has been endorsed by Conservative MP Joy Smith—"isn't consistent" with the Supreme Court of Canada's recent ruling striking down three of the country's prostitution laws.
"The client is criminalized, but not the sex worker," Sigurdson said. "In that context, the same issue of danger and jeopardy will persist when one of the parties rather than the other is criminalized. We would take the view that it couldn't be upheld under this decision of the Supreme Court of Canada because you're going to find the exact same problems persisting."
This is democracy in action, my friend. Your opinion doesn't count. Unless you have $1B to invest. Then we're all ears.Wow thanks reverdy for this info. A very nice surprise. I never expected this from THIS government. I never thought they would release the results!!!!. And what I don't understand since there was no checkboxes in the survey how can they say how much support is out there for each category???? If that was a poll I would have expected between 70 to 80% support for decriminalization and less than 15% for Nordic. With the release of the result how on earth can the government justify any Nordic style laws. That said I don't know if the response sample is skewed by religious organizations and fanatics who are usually a lot more determined than most of terbites and sex trade supporters are as they see it their religious duty to respond. Even if one-third of terbite had participated it would have been overwhelmingly positive for sex workers. To those who didn't participate in spite of our daily encouragements and bumping of thread I say this. You missed your chances to speak out when you were needed to do so then whatever the laws you will have no rights to complain..
He has to listen if he's interested for his party to remain in power next year. Not pissing off voters is the key to politics. If they don't listen and pander to fringe group, and they lose the elections because of it, then they didn't deserve to stay in power anyway. That's why Harper, despite his religious beliefs, has stayed away from the abortion issue, and continued with the policy of previous governments. Governments now make policy based on polls, and they will legislate with the object of offending the least amount of voters.I doubt that Mackay would listen to those 80% supporting decriminlization.
I sincerely hope you're right about that, wilbur - but from what I've been hearing, the future doesn't look too promising, for the short term at least.He has to listen if he's interested for his party to remain in power next year. Not pissing off voters is the key to politics. If they don't listen and pander to fringe group, and they lose the elections because of it, then they didn't deserve to stay in power anyway. That's why Harper, despite his religious beliefs, has stayed away from the abortion issue, and continued with the policy of previous governments. Governments now make policy based on polls, and they will legislate with the object of offending the least amount of voters.
There have always been brothels in Syria, and they were very open (don't know now because of the war), so not subject to police action. Nowadays, a lot of Syrian and Iraqi refugee women turn to prostitution in desperation to feed their relatives.Lol I opened up the thread hoping for an announcement on government sponsored survey and found the poll on Israelis!!!!!!!!!. That said I am surprised as they appear to be a lot more open minded than their stupid neighboring arabs who a majority of them likely punish prostitutes severely.
Israel has had a big problem with trafficking women and tricking them into the sex-trade. in poor countries like Moldova and Ukraine, girls respond to ads promising them adventure and lots of money in Israel and Turkey as dancers and bar maids. They get roped in when they arrive and are told they owe for the trip (with huge mark-ups) and are stuck until they pay up; until then, the facilitators withhold their passports and then force them into prostitution against their will. If they go to the Israeli police, they get charged with working illegally and locked up until deportation. If they file a complaint, they still get locked up as risk of flight witnesses. Complaints involve forcible confinement, assault, extortion and rape. If they do arrest and charge the pimps, most are let go with a fine after a plea bargain, or if they go to jail, it's not more than 6 months. Meanwhile, the girl who fled to the police is locked up for over a year until the trial takes place, and then deported without any compensation. So girls who are caught up in this mess are not so likely to seek help and resolve to endure the rest of their term, servicing clients.Lol I opened up the thread hoping for an announcement on government sponsored survey and found the poll on Israelis!!!!!!!!!. That said I am surprised as they appear to be a lot more open minded than their stupid neighboring arabs who a majority of them likely punish prostitutes severely.
Too late for that... Bedford and her friends already did. Idiots...He might probably forgot. Don't wake up the sleeping dog
I've got the impression that they are going to come up with a bill, see what the polls and public reaction is, and then call elections. They are going to do the same with the firearms act. Then they are going to say that, if they their constituency wants these bills to become law, they are going top have to re-elect them in power.We may still have a chance if we keep him asleep until the next federal elections.
No. The election isn't until 2015. The SCC has clearly stated that new laws must be in place by the end of December of this year; Otherwise, the exisitng laws will be struck off the books, and there will be a legislative void. The Cons will never allow that to happen.I've got the impression that they are going to come up with a bill, see what the polls and public reaction is, and then call elections. They are going to do the same with the firearms act. Then they are going to say that, if they their constituency wants these bills to become law, they are going top have to re-elect them in power.
The 3 old CCC sections, while still on the books until the one year deadline is up, are not currently being enforced anyway. So even if the one year stay comes and goes, it won't practically change anything. Police are now concentrating on trafficking, whatever that means. 2015 BTW, is only 8 months away, and bills sometimes take at least that long to go through the parliamentary process. The Bill could get delayed a long time through committee hearings. There's going to be a big hoopla when it goes to committee, and the government can just pull the election switch if they want out.The SCC didn't state that the deadline for the laws is in December, it just stated that after one year the old laws will be no longer in effect.
The government is free to make any new law after that deadline.
The Attorney General of Alberta had to remind police forces and Crown prosecutors to enforce the law on the books, including the 3 CCC prostitution sections in question. But nobody's listening. I'm not going to do a search just to prove my point, but prosecutions are way down. Crowns know judges would throw out the charges anyway because the SCC has deemed them unconstitutional. How could a court convict someone based on a law that was declared unconstitutional, albeit still on the books? It would be a moral dilemma.They are currently still enforcing them but only on clients