I wouldn't want him to take that away from you, Phil.There's always a career as an escort agency driver :nod:
I wouldn't want him to take that away from you, Phil.There's always a career as an escort agency driver :nod:
Its a hard life, but somebody has to courier those court papersI wouldn't want him to take that away from you, Phil.
It IS a bit of a light sentence. He pleaded guilty. A conditional sentence means that if he obeys his probation terms and attends counseling, he will have no FORMAL criminal record at the end of the probation period. So he will be able to travel back and fore to the US and other counties. For a guy who seemed absolutely nailed, with a complainant who was eager to testify, it seems like he got off on the easy side.He got off with not getting a criminal record, what a joke!
He says he "bears her no ill will..... "Based on this curbside interview with a reporter from his old company he doesn't seem that repentant with his plea deal or his sentence.
https://twitter.com/NEWSTALK1010/status/1005207756352172034
Poor Phil, today is #Empathyday . So I won't respond to you in a harsh or negative tone.Its a hard life, but somebody has to courier those court papers
It brings us to whether there was anything fake about Mulligan's story. We won't know unless Bullard makes more explicit statements. And yes, his life is wrecked. And I'm sure that was taken into account.Oagre, again I'm just speculating, but IMHO, Mulligan is probably happy to have this ordeal, behind her, as well?? It's interesting how Mulligan used her almost 20K twitter followers, to further damage Bullard's reputation. What I mean, is that Mulligan (through her friend Avery Haines), made public her full victim impact statement, when the judge told Mulligan and her lawyer to edit it, during the actual court hearing.
Oagre, I'm just wondering who Bullard wants to sue?? Bullard keeps talking about civil court?? Bullard's own twitter acct, is somewhat cryptic on this issue??
IMHO, I don't think Bullard's sentence was that light, as he did pay a "high price", according to the judge. He did lose a "cushy" job he had with Newstalk 1010. When Bullard, was a radio host on newstalk 1010, he got at lot of side gigs, because of his radio presence. I'm sure a lot of those "side gigs", have now dried up for Bullard. As usual, just my opinion!!
He seems to really hate that the words stalker and stalking were used in relation to him, along with being irrationally angry at all the media who reported on his irrationally angry behaviour over the last couple of years....wondering who Bullard wants to sue?? Bullard keeps talking about civil court??...
From your link:
I have a hard time believing this though. Why would cops suggest she should move??The toughest part was when I came home from the police station after Bullard’s arrest to tell my daughters that police suggested we should move
If Bullard is harassing her from payphones, then the cops can't devote the time and man power to surveilling him 24/7.From your link:
I have a hard time believing this though. Why would cops suggest she should move??
That makes no sense, because it implies cops are either unwilling or powerless to stop Bullard.
If it is true then Mike is a total piece of shit.
Harrassing a woman (with kids) to the point she feels she has to move is beyond the pale
They did get CCTV video of him from a payphone apparently.If Bullard is harassing her from payphones, then the cops can't devote the time and man power to surveilling him 24/7
Wow.Based on this curbside interview with a reporter from his old company he doesn't seem that repentant with his plea deal or his sentence.
https://twitter.com/NEWSTALK1010/status/1005207756352172034
Midlife crisis maybe.But one thing is confusing to me.....if she is as much a piece of work as he implies here in this video, then why did he pursue her so much? (Does not sound like that is in dispute.)
Gotta love the twisted opinions of some. Yes. Please do save your own ass by stoping when woman says she is not interested. Don't do it out of respect for her saying she is not interested. Just do it because you may lose out on a lot because she will clearly turn it into some drama fiasco. LOL.Excellent post. I'm just guessing that IMHO, Mulligan is both a smart lady, who is also really good looking. Obviously Bullard, was attracted to both her looks and intelligence. In other words, Mulligan is a much better looking lady, then Bullard is a guy---LOL
With that being said, this thread teaches me a valuable lesson. When a lady says she's no longer interested, then just move on. Not only did Bullard lose his news talk 1010 hosting job, because of this fiasco. Also, Bullard's legal bills, must be through the roof??
There's nothing worse than meddlers who poke their nose into the justice system and try and get some sort of personal mileage out of denouncing it.
And this is why assholes like him get away with abusing women for so long. You are a fan of a stalker??? Of a person who harassed a woman and her children????Fair enough, but why did the judge dismiss most of Bullard's charges then?? Also, it seemed from the transcripts, that the judge wasn't overly enthusiastic about the way the prosecutor handled the case.
As i said before, I have no legal knowledge whatsoever. I'm just a huge Bullard fan, who wishes he was still working as a host on newstalk 1010.
No. It is not. The role of the judge is to listen to both sides but that doesn't mean that there isn't shit that happens between the lawyers. Between the police. Like really??? Are you that daft????Yes, but the judge doesn't think that Mike Bullard was a stalker. Isn't it the judge's job, to determine right from wrong??