More BBFS warnings !

euripides said:
and next; ?????

Real sex?


Honestly I agree with Red here. The fact that you think that she has proposed you BBFS does not mean that she's doing it with every client. The only way to verify that, and somehow to answer your question that is not one, is to give the names to a discrete person who'd keep track of those reports.

If some girls stands out, then people should be warned and act accordingly, that is keep going there if they want, or not. But at least they were informed.

Be that as it may your post makes no sense as you don't post any names, which is good, and you don't ask anything, which is just blobbing - now because the choice is yours to continue seeing them or not don't post.
 
Not to sure what the problem is here. I've been doing Bear sex all my life and it has not Bruined my health at all. Great Bear.
 
I don't really see the point of this post either. Even if those in question were named, there would still be others out there doing the same thing. And how many clients have had bareback with someone recently even if it was not an SP? No reason to think that the girl that you picked up in a bar or in some cases even your SO is not engagung in BB with others as well.

And ALL sexual encounters, unless beween two strictly monogamous adults, carries certain risks. Read the print on a condom. They say that their use can lessen the risk of sexually transmitted diseases but they never guarantee 100 % safety. View all encounters as having some risk, weigh the options and if you don't want to take any risks don't participate in the hobby.
 
weddoes said:
Umm, how about not sticking your uncovered dick in her? How is this the girls' responsibility solely? Idiot.

Yeah, yeah, if she does it with me, who else is she doing it with? If you play safe, that shouldn't be a problem... you're intentionally playing Russian roulette (apologies if we're talking EE girls here) and yet trying to shirk personal accountability. Douchebag.

:rolleyes:

I'm sure most "hobbyists" have been offered BB services. But it's up to us, individually and collectively, to play safe.

I'm not sure that you have read the thread. It might be prudent to do so before throwing around such disparaging epithets and demonstrating a level of impatience that renders your comments spurious and difficult to tolerate.
 
Under no circumstance should you

out these individuals.

Euripides, your post is a little silly. Whether this has happened to you or not shouldn't impact how careful anyone is. Just because you've been given such offers won't impact anyone's decisioin in similar situations. (Do you really think someone so tempted is going to say to themselves - "wait! Euripides warned me!")

Now I don't know the circumstances, and I wasn't a witness to these events, but unless these women were mentally impaired, they'd obviously made a conscious decision and have decided to live with the consequences.

Perhaps they felt (however foolishly) that you were safe. Perhaps they were motivated by the desire to get you to repeat. Perhaps they were overcome with the need for you to implant your sperm in them. I don't really care. The fact is, they made the decision - and what happened was strictly between you and each of them.

Outing them could have serious real life consequences. It's wrong.
 
TQM said:
out these individuals.

Euripides, your post is a little silly. I don't really care.
Outing them could have serious real life consequences. It's wrong.

You cared enough to respond and your points are quite valid and worth sharing. Don't underestimate yourself.

We are stimulating some discussion; some relevant; some humorous; some supersilious; but all worthwhile in the aid (no pun intended) of human relations.

Thanks for caring eventhough you said you don't.
 
euripides said:
I'm not sure that you have read the thread. It might be prudent to do so before throwing around such disparaging epithets and demonstrating a level of impatience that renders your comments spurious and difficult to tolerate.
Well it is interesting that you are call others comments "spurious" when you are partaking in certain activities but warning others not too? How does that make sense?
 
hunter001 said:
Well it is interesting that you are call others comments "spurious" when you are partaking in certain activities but warning others not too? How does that make sense?

I am not spurious but I may be a hypocrite !
 
euripides said:
I am not spurious but I may be a hypocrite !
Among other things. :D
 
euripides said:
I am not spurious but I may be a hypocrite !

let see....

pu·ri·ous /ˈspyʊəriəs/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[spyoor-ee-uhs] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective
1. not genuine, authentic, or true; not from the claimed, pretended, or proper source; counterfeit.

hyp·o·crite /ˈhɪpəkrɪt/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[hip-uh-krit] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
2. a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.

Wow it seems you are both with this thread.
 
Mr. Hunter: Would please point out the spurious comments which I have made in this thread. It would be most helpful to my self-improvement efforts.

Thank you in advance.
 
rip

It's way stupid of you to quote out of context. I said clearly I don't care why you were given such offers. I do care very much that you don't out people - which has been suggested as your course of action in this thread.
 
The Ladies may have just got carried away with the client and MAY NOT be offering this service to everyone.
 
TQM said:
It's way stupid of you to quote out of context. I said clearly I don't care why you were given such offers. I do care very much that you don't out people - which has been suggested as your course of action in this thread.

Please read the first comment. I indicated that I did not want to ( and can add "wouldn't") out these ladies.

It does make it easier to respond if people listen (ie read).

Thank you for caring. It makes it a better world for all of us.

Ta ta !
 
I did read the first comment.

And just as others were suggesting you out them - or finding your post irrelevant unless you outed them - I was putting in my two cents and saying you shouldn't.

There are very few circumstances under which I'd support the "outing" of anybody.
 
TQM said:
And just as others were suggesting you out them - or finding your post irrelevant unless you outed them - I was putting in my two cents and saying you shouldn't.

There are very few circumstances under which I'd support the "outing" of anybody.

See, you've made another valid point and all because you care.

My thread is a success.

Thank you one and all (even if you don't ,or can't, read)

Isn't communication marvelous !
 
That I care about people not being

outed, should not indicate to you your thread's success or lack thereof.
 
TQM said:
outed, should not indicate to you your thread's success or lack thereof.

As I said, don't ever underestimate yourself. You and you alone have sent this thread over the top.

Congratulations and Thanks again !

Now, I'm outahere.

'Til Niagara Falls !!