More BBFS warnings !

euripides

New member
Oct 28, 2006
766
0
0
Over the past few weeks , I have been offered bbfs by two ladies who have been reviewed by terbites on this board; one an sp and the other an mp.

In both cases, I was foolin' around between their legs with Mr. Johnson exploring the outer reaches of Ms. Kitty and environs. Suddenly the lady pulled me with her legs and indicated that she wanted me in her "sans condo." I immediately pulled away, indicated my concern, and finished the session as I had originally anticipated. Both are service oriented ladies and I would hate to see them out of the hobby.

Unfortunately ,I'm sure that I'm not the first nor will I likely be the last. If these ladies are doing it, so are others.

What can we do to get these ladies back on the right track while still keeping the service levels "high" and without "outing" them.

I'd be interested in your comments. Maybe Mr.Johnson should practice his massage skills away from the opening for the "cavern of death", but it is so much fun !!!
 
Not really 1) just another warning for terbites to be careful; and 2) looking for suggestions that don't involve an outing of the ladies but might help control this growing area of concern.

If you're not interested, so be it; but others may be.
 
Thanks for the warning... Unfortunately, if we don't know who. We are no further ahead than we were before we wasted our time reading this
 
euripides said:
Not really 1) just another warning for terbites to be careful; and 2) looking for suggestions that don't involve an outing of the ladies but might help control this growing area of concern.

If you're not interested, so be it; but others may be.

How can other terbites know to be careful if we don't know who to be careful of??
 
emailme84 said:
Thanks for the warning... Unfortunately, if we don't know who. We are no further ahead than we were before we wasted our time reading this

Again, you might be more careful. I suspect that many girls are performing this act; so, naming two only centres them out and leaves all the others. From my point of view a little "pre-warning" may make hobbyists a little more careful. That can't hurt(unless they make a big mistake).

This is the lounge where I thought "discussion" was encouraged.
 
emailme84 said:
How can other terbites know to be careful if we don't know who to be careful of??
'In this hobby you should be careful with everyone !! As we are all aware ( or should be) anyone partaking in the hobby is at risk to themselves or others. It's part of the game.
 
~

my first opinion is that the girls should be outed.

but then i wonder how this practice can backfire when really..
i am not suggesting that you are being untruthful here...but
it is your word against theirs. there are a lot of vindictive people in this world..and what better way to ruin a girls reputation then to say she offered you BBFS?
 
euripides said:
Again, you might be more careful. I suspect that many girls are performing this act; so, naming two only centres them out and leaves all the others. From my point of view a little "pre-warning" may make hobbyists a little more careful. That can't hurt(unless they make a big mistake).

This is the lounge where I thought "discussion" was encouraged.

How is your warning going to make us more or less carefull?? Are we supose to walk into an SP or MP and think, "shit, she better not try to pull some BBFS on me.. oh no she is grabbing my pecker, is she soing to do BBFS now ?" C'mon get realistic. Just like you walked away from it when she was about to perform the BB service others will too regardless of your post/warning. Your warning is nothing new.

Now how would your post be helpfull? Post who they are so members don't waste their time or take risks with such ladies, other then that all you are doing is wasting everyones time..
 
maya, That's certainly one of the issues. Also there is the issue of sp's saying that they never perform bbfs when that may be a lie as well. It's a tough bus. with tough people. Sometimes( ie most times) priorities of sp's and johns get screwed up.
 
Laidlaw said:
Post who they are so members don't waste their time or take risks with such ladies, other then that all you are doing is wasting everyones time..

"such ladies" could be any of the sp's and mp's ot there. This was not meant to be 'something new"; rather, just a further reminder and a request for useful advice.

All the best.
 
then maybe you should not have started your thread with :
euripides said:
Over the past few weeks , I have been offered bbfs by two ladies who have been reviewed by terbites on this board; one an sp and the other an mp.

You are pinpointing 2 ladies in particular. Not any sp or MP out there as you so put it.
 
Laidlaw said:
then maybe you should not have started your thread with :


You are pinpointing 2 ladies in particular. Not any sp or MP out there as you so put it.

I believe that the initial comments lead directly to the middle paragraph and simply act as a credible "lead in."
 
Mao Tse Tongue said:
And for those that don't have TERB-speak translators, this means "I hit the shit out of that and then was horrified."
QUOTE]

I certainly wasn't horrified, but thought it was worth commenting on again. It does seem to be getting a little more prevalent.
 
The world is going bareback. Nice.

This should kill the entire industry in no time.
 
ladyofthenite said:
I believe that they mistakenly think that this is what the client wants, and that if they provide it, they will maintain a strong financial base and pool of clients.
Sandy
:)

I think you are partially correct; but i believe that there is more. Sex for men is something like narcotics; " you keep wanting a bigger and bigger thrill."

First it was massage parlors; then sp agencies; then bbbj; then anal; then bbbjtc,cim cimsw; then rimming; and next; ?????
 
euripides said:
I think you are partially correct; but i believe that there is more. Sex for men is something like narcotics; " you keep wanting a bigger and bigger thrill."

First it was massage parlors; then sp agencies; then bbbj; then anal; then bbbjtc,cim cimsw; then rimming; and next; ?????
contact the moderators and tell them in confidence who and when - they keep track of this info and if it can be verified with other reports then they can tell everyone who this is.
 
wim said:
It sounds as though euripides was "exploring" the nether-regions of the ladies in question using his cock. Now, this kind of activity may result in a wee bit of penetration, hardly any at all. Some SPs or MPs may do this with regular, familiar clients. In no way should this be misconstrued as an SP inviting BBFS which to me is full or substantial penetration without the hat. I suspect that euripides may have misinterpreted what the ladies were inviting or, he is a regular clean-cut kinda guy who drives the ladies wild and they abandon all caution. What I find disturbing is that euripides is tempting both himself and the lady with his described activity and now wailing on the board about ladies willing do BBFS. Do you also sense bullshit here?
Wim,

I'm not wailing! Simply passing on what is happening. I think if you read the thread you will see that I don't place all the blame on the ladies. It is clearly a two-way situation and I suspect many johns 'ask' for this kind of treatment and maybe push the envelope.

I also indicated that my "kitty massage" may have been part of the problem; but as i stated; it's a lot of fun.

And the purpose of me "bullshitting" would be ???

I guess you are correct. A little bit of cum just inside ms. Kitty would never cause any problem. How stupid of me to even bring the matter up.