Modi scolds Trudeau over Sikh protests in Canada against India

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,553
3,124
113
I am not a Hindu Nationalist. I am an Indian Nationalist. All Indians are nationalists. India does not exist without nationalism.
tee-hee-hee .... giggles.....guffaw.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,553
3,124
113
No I haven't. I have said I do not agree with Hindu Nationalism.
Of course you don't,

But, why do you feel the innate need to state that and be so defensive about it?

Very fine people .... on both sides?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,553
3,124
113
Someone called me Hindu Nationalist. I said I am not. That is not being defensive. That is just stating a position.
Well at least it's a little easier on the soul than being called a rabid Hindu Nationalist, huh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bver_hunter

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,063
6,588
113
Let me be the one to teach you Indian history.

As I mentioned, in the other response, Nazism is a western ideal and their anti-semitism is not shared by Indians. It is not in the culture. So regardless of what the Nazis did to the Jews, that is not on Bose. That is your western issue.

Bose intended to fight the British to free India. Which is why he is a national hero.
Bose was a Hindu nationalist who believed that India was for Hindus and he fought with the Nazis both in Europe and the Subcontinent.

And yes, it is still moronically hypocritical of you to bitch about Canada accidentally honouring a Waffen SS private while you and India celebrate a Waffen SS commander.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,063
6,588
113
That is why I posted the article. ...
Did you ever read it? It has allegations, not evidence.

You simply follow blind nationalistic tendencies of automatically accepting anything Modi says while rejecting any criticism of India.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,063
6,588
113
We can very well pick and choose.

Bose belonging to a country that has no history of anti-semitism or white nationalism, fought against his colonial oppressors. So he is a national hero.

Hunka belonging to a country that is known for anti-semitism, joined the Nazis to do...god knows what. But it is not a good look.
Yes you can pick and choose. Just don't be surprised that we call out your ridiculous hypocrisy.

p.s. There's been no evidence Hulka is/was antisemitic, just that he was part of a military unit that promoted it. And yes, that is the exact same Waffen SS your hero was in.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,063
6,588
113
No Modi is a democratically elected leader of a country, that knows what it is talking about. Canada on the other hand, allowed 329 people, 288 of them Canadians to die because they turned their backs on India's warnings. So Canada should learn from India and Canadians should suspend their adulation of their dear leader Trudeau and wake the fuck up.
Wow. Modi is right because he was democratically elected but Trudeau is wrong because....he was democratically elected?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,063
6,588
113
Or you can tell your dear leader Trudeau to snap out of it and grow a pair and call these Khalistanis out for who they are. Terrorists.
If you're a Canadian citizen, he's your leader too. Remember when you told us you can't be an Indian dual citizen?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,063
6,588
113
Oh please, he came in 1974 and was suddenly brainwashed? lol. Nice try. The diaspora Sikhs and their Khalistani movement is an everyday affair for these idiots.
And more of the claims that the entirety of Sikhs outside of India are terrorists.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
89,060
21,174
113
Yes, your racist nationalism is disgusting, especially as you keep making excuses for Hamas launching thousands of war crimes and abducting women and children.
Your Jewish supremacy is no different than Hindu nationalism, except that its more violent.
You can't defend apartheid and say other people are the racists.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
89,060
21,174
113
Modi is right, because he is a democratically elected leader who hails from a country that has made all the right calls with respect to handling Khalistani terror. Trudeau on the other hand comes from a country that shelters terrorists even after they managed to kill 288 Canadians. So yes Modi and by extension India is right. Canada is wrong.
Canada investigated and jailed those terrorists for that one act 40 years ago.
You still seem to be calling backing Hindu nationalist violence and international assassinations 'the right call'. Going so far as to say you'd personally help kill people a foreign government call 'terrorists' here in Canada.
In this country we try to support the rule of law.

You are supposed to be Canadian now, you should leave your violent extremism at the border.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kautilya

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
89,060
21,174
113
Canada should not have even let those guys in, in the first place.
No, India should not have raided the Golden Temple and started that round of violence and the terrorist response.
If that didn't happen they wouldn't have responded.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
89,060
21,174
113
India definitely was right in raiding the Golden Temple because terrorists were holed up inside and orchestrating attacks across the nation. That is why the commanders who led the attack were themselves Sikh.

And you have still not apologized for going too far with your words.
Why should I apologize?
You offered to aid India in 'taking out' terrorists here in Canada?
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
28,419
6,453
113
It was justified to storm the Golden Temple because Khalistani terrorists were holed up inside and had to be neutralized. On the other hand, it was not justified to bomb a plane and kill Canadians - which seems to be the argument you are making here.
There may have been two Khalistani Terrorists in the temple. Did not mean that they should have stormed it, killed many other worshippers and destroyed the temple. They could have surrounded it for days, not allowed anyone to enter the temple and eventually allowed just the worshippers to leave the temple. That is normally the way the police act when criminals take some hostages in banks etc.!!
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
28,419
6,453
113
Are you mentally challenged? What part of history, where the Khalistani movement began in India in the 30s did you miss? These guys grew up in the movement. Again I ask you the same questions. What do you have to say about this?


Again you are the one who never gets his facts right, just your usual bias. The actual Council for Khalistan was formed in 1980:

Council of Khalistan
After returning to India in 1977, Chohan travelled to Britain in 1979. There, he would establish the Council of Khalistan,[47] declaring its formation at Anandpur Sahib on 12 April 1980. Chohan designated himself as President of the Council and Balbir Singh Sandhu as its Secretary General.

In May 1980, Chohan travelled to London to announce the formation of Khalistan. A similar announcement was made in Amritsar by Sandhu, who released stamps and currency of Khalistan. Operating from a building termed "Khalistan House", Chohan named a Cabinet and declared himself president of the "Republic of Khalistan," issuing symbolic Khalistan 'passports,' 'postage stamps,' and 'Khalistan dollars.' Moreover, embassies in Britain and other European countries were opened by Chohan.[45] It is reported that, with the support of a wealthy Californian peach magnate, Chohan opened an Ecuadorian bank account to further support his operation.[46] As well as maintaining contacts among various groups in Canada, the US, and Germany, Chohan kept in contact with the Sikh leader Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale who was campaigning for a theocratic Sikh homeland.[45]

The globalized Sikh diaspora invested efforts and resources for Khalistan, but the Khalistan movement remained nearly invisible on the global political scene until the Operation Blue Star of June 1984.[44]

That is what I'm referring to, and that is what triggered these actual acts of terrorism by those Sikhs in Canada!! Again you posted those BS videos that I already responded to.

Here is your idol called Modi whose party embraced the real terrorists who he pardoned aft they violently raped a woman, killed her family members and beat up her child:


The victim has had to go into hiding, as she now fears for her life. Let us hear your comments about this fact!!
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
89,060
21,174
113
You know I did not. You know that I said I support Indian govt. action to take out terrorists and that is very different from saying "I will aid in taking out terrorists". You are deliberately name calling here and you know it. You owe me an apology for deliberately going too far with your words.
You said you'd volunteer to help them assassinate 'terrorists'.
I called you out on this at the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bver_hunter

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
28,419
6,453
113
LOL.

The immigration criteria changed COMPLETELY. There is literally no similarity between immigration today and when these guys came in. In any case, India warned Canada, back in the day and these people should not have been allowed to bring their problems to Canada. And remember, it is only them that have the problems. And Pierre Trudeau let them in. So he is responsible for enabling the movement. Poor Mulrooney was PM for barely a year, so no, I am going to hold the previous PM responsible for this as it was his policies which enabled this tragedy.


India's religious riots are not Canada's issues. That is not in debate here and that is deflection and bluster on your part. Let us focus on the core of the issue, which faces Canada today. Which is Khalistani terrorism, protected by the state for politically convenient reasons. My patriotism or nationalism for India is irrelevant as is Hindu Nationalism, Modi etc as it regards this debate.
Again more nonsense from you. The Immigration policies have barely changed for decades. Canada normally takes the cream of the crop compared to countries in Europe and even the USA.
Pierre Trudeau had nothing to do with their migration to Canada. Now as I said that individual entered as a dependant of his parents even though he was 22 years old. His parents met the criteria. When Canada's citizens are murdered on our soil by foreign agents, it is Canada's problem. India does not want to co-operate as it knows that it was complicit in this killing!! The Air India jet was downed in 1985 and under The Mulroney Government. Clearly, if there was any intel on these terrorist, then the Mulroney Government should have acted prior to the downing of the jet. Get your facts right and not the biased Indian press that gives Modi a pass on everything under The Sun!!

This are the real Modi colours when his own Federal party play a key role in the pardoning of the real terrorists:

India’s Modi government approved release of Bilkis Bano’s rapists
Eleven men convicted of gang-raping Bilkis Bano and killing her family members during the 2002 Gujarat riots were released in August.


There is the actual letter from the Federal Government approving the pardoning of these terrorists. It led to protests around India, and the victims have now gone into hiding. Yet that corrupt Modi thug's Government want to take down activists calling for a separate Khalistan. If he has any balls then he will call for a referendum like we did in Quebec so as to close the Chapter for good if those in Punjab prefer to be a part of India. Period!!
 
Last edited:
Toronto Escorts