You are proof that it exists here.Hindu Nationalism does not exist in the west. It is an Indian phenomenon. This is some Khalistani idiot, spewing nonsense. You know what is Hinduphobic. This:
You are proof that it exists here.Hindu Nationalism does not exist in the west. It is an Indian phenomenon. This is some Khalistani idiot, spewing nonsense. You know what is Hinduphobic. This:
So you say.I am not a Hindu Nationalist. I am an Indian Nationalist. All Indians are nationalists. India does not exist without nationalism.
tee-hee-hee .... giggles.....guffaw.....I am not a Hindu Nationalist. I am an Indian Nationalist. All Indians are nationalists. India does not exist without nationalism.
Of course you don't,No I haven't. I have said I do not agree with Hindu Nationalism.
Well at least it's a little easier on the soul than being called a rabid Hindu Nationalist, huh?Someone called me Hindu Nationalist. I said I am not. That is not being defensive. That is just stating a position.
Bose was a Hindu nationalist who believed that India was for Hindus and he fought with the Nazis both in Europe and the Subcontinent.Let me be the one to teach you Indian history.
As I mentioned, in the other response, Nazism is a western ideal and their anti-semitism is not shared by Indians. It is not in the culture. So regardless of what the Nazis did to the Jews, that is not on Bose. That is your western issue.
Bose intended to fight the British to free India. Which is why he is a national hero.
Did you ever read it? It has allegations, not evidence.That is why I posted the article. ...
Yes you can pick and choose. Just don't be surprised that we call out your ridiculous hypocrisy.We can very well pick and choose.
Bose belonging to a country that has no history of anti-semitism or white nationalism, fought against his colonial oppressors. So he is a national hero.
Hunka belonging to a country that is known for anti-semitism, joined the Nazis to do...god knows what. But it is not a good look.
Wow. Modi is right because he was democratically elected but Trudeau is wrong because....he was democratically elected?No Modi is a democratically elected leader of a country, that knows what it is talking about. Canada on the other hand, allowed 329 people, 288 of them Canadians to die because they turned their backs on India's warnings. So Canada should learn from India and Canadians should suspend their adulation of their dear leader Trudeau and wake the fuck up.
If you're a Canadian citizen, he's your leader too. Remember when you told us you can't be an Indian dual citizen?Or you can tell your dear leader Trudeau to snap out of it and grow a pair and call these Khalistanis out for who they are. Terrorists.
And more of the claims that the entirety of Sikhs outside of India are terrorists.Oh please, he came in 1974 and was suddenly brainwashed? lol. Nice try. The diaspora Sikhs and their Khalistani movement is an everyday affair for these idiots.
Yes, your racist nationalism is disgusting, especially as you keep making excuses for Hamas launching thousands of war crimes and abducting women and children.You just met the kettle, mr pot.
Your Jewish supremacy is no different than Hindu nationalism, except that its more violent.Yes, your racist nationalism is disgusting, especially as you keep making excuses for Hamas launching thousands of war crimes and abducting women and children.
Canada investigated and jailed those terrorists for that one act 40 years ago.Modi is right, because he is a democratically elected leader who hails from a country that has made all the right calls with respect to handling Khalistani terror. Trudeau on the other hand comes from a country that shelters terrorists even after they managed to kill 288 Canadians. So yes Modi and by extension India is right. Canada is wrong.
No, India should not have raided the Golden Temple and started that round of violence and the terrorist response.Canada should not have even let those guys in, in the first place.
Why should I apologize?India definitely was right in raiding the Golden Temple because terrorists were holed up inside and orchestrating attacks across the nation. That is why the commanders who led the attack were themselves Sikh.
And you have still not apologized for going too far with your words.
There may have been two Khalistani Terrorists in the temple. Did not mean that they should have stormed it, killed many other worshippers and destroyed the temple. They could have surrounded it for days, not allowed anyone to enter the temple and eventually allowed just the worshippers to leave the temple. That is normally the way the police act when criminals take some hostages in banks etc.!!It was justified to storm the Golden Temple because Khalistani terrorists were holed up inside and had to be neutralized. On the other hand, it was not justified to bomb a plane and kill Canadians - which seems to be the argument you are making here.
Again you are the one who never gets his facts right, just your usual bias. The actual Council for Khalistan was formed in 1980:Are you mentally challenged? What part of history, where the Khalistani movement began in India in the 30s did you miss? These guys grew up in the movement. Again I ask you the same questions. What do you have to say about this?
You said you'd volunteer to help them assassinate 'terrorists'.You know I did not. You know that I said I support Indian govt. action to take out terrorists and that is very different from saying "I will aid in taking out terrorists". You are deliberately name calling here and you know it. You owe me an apology for deliberately going too far with your words.
Again more nonsense from you. The Immigration policies have barely changed for decades. Canada normally takes the cream of the crop compared to countries in Europe and even the USA.LOL.
The immigration criteria changed COMPLETELY. There is literally no similarity between immigration today and when these guys came in. In any case, India warned Canada, back in the day and these people should not have been allowed to bring their problems to Canada. And remember, it is only them that have the problems. And Pierre Trudeau let them in. So he is responsible for enabling the movement. Poor Mulrooney was PM for barely a year, so no, I am going to hold the previous PM responsible for this as it was his policies which enabled this tragedy.
Justin Trudeau's father Pierre Trudeau had shielded Khalistani terrorist Talwinder Parmar, ignored Indira Gandhi's extradition request
In 1982, then PM Pierre Trudeau sheilded Khalistani terrorist Talwinder Singh Parmar who later planned the bombing Indian aircraft Kanishka killing 329 people out of which 268 were Canadian citizens. | OpIndia Newswww.opindia.com
India's religious riots are not Canada's issues. That is not in debate here and that is deflection and bluster on your part. Let us focus on the core of the issue, which faces Canada today. Which is Khalistani terrorism, protected by the state for politically convenient reasons. My patriotism or nationalism for India is irrelevant as is Hindu Nationalism, Modi etc as it regards this debate.