LancsLad said:
Open bidding for those jobs would be fair.
The concept of the closed shop removes any chance of an optimal contract from the paying publics perspective.
.
Ok I see your point.
If someone was allowed to bid on a TTC job at a lower hourly wage - which they would in this environment for sure - then the employee will have to lower their wage or find a new job.
I guess this is what you mean.
BUT
Unions and the "closed shop concept" was made legal in order to protect workers from over exploitation , you do not agree with this law but free market capitalism.
Fair enough. Your point is made and it is intelligent
I will argue against the free market as being incredibly exploitative as its history shows.
Do you think it is OK for less than 20% of the population to own over 80% of the wealth? This is the bigger concern IMHO
The end result of this market meltdown is increasing this disparity as the rich are buying up stocks and land at fire sale prices. Why are not you not angry at this? They are far richer and do no productive work for society that I can see. How does selling short and driving up prices through speculation create wealth for the workers who produce ALL THE WEALTH ? As we have seen , it actually destroys the wealth.
What protection do you feel the workers should have if any?
In the Godfather it was made clear that the business of business is business.
The Mafia is simply capitalism without the rules.
Is this what you prefer?
BTW they have open shops down south in the USA they call it " right to work law " a euphemism if there ever was one
perhaps you should work in one of those unions for $10 with no rights before deciding, or perhaps not, just a suggestion
Capitalism is quite the merry dance, on this we can agree I suspect