scubadoo said:??
Leetch 6.6 million
Gonchar 3.65 million
Sorry. Leetch is looked in at that price for next year too and Gonchar is eligible for arbitration. The rumour is he's asking for $7-8 range and he'll get it too.
scubadoo said:??
Leetch 6.6 million
Gonchar 3.65 million
For what the Leafs gave up, I would have given that up AND thrown in Antropov, for Gonchar.reaper29 said:... The Leafs could have gotten Gonchar ...
They didn't have to give away their "A" list kids such as ... Antropov
Firstly, who isn't better than Berg.Kathleen said:On the flip side, Leetch is better then Berg,
and other Leafs on the blueline, so it is an improvement.
I'm just mad Gonchar went for nothing.
gladheateher said:Gonchar goes for one prospect and a 1st and 2nd, Leetch for two prospects and a first and a second, JFJ overpayed bigtime
Foxbat said:Today I'd trade injury prone Antropov for Lindros straight up now & go for it all
Not sure just what is wrong with a 'two-way centre/forward'. Isn't that what Steve Yzerman is?Foxbat said:I would've given Steen who'll probably only be a two-way centre/forward and kept the 1st rounder.
Then he'll be disappointed when he finds out he's got a future Hoglund.Foxbat said:Who is that Finn guy? Sather's hoping he's got a future Kurri.
Ridiculous move..........unless you're a Ranger fan. What's next? Trading Stajan and Ponikarovsky for Simon and Barnaby? LOLFoxbat said:Today I'd trade injury prone Antropov for Lindros straight up now & go for it all
Ross said:huh??? What are you smoking? a -5 puts leetch in the very bottom of the league??? He's certainly not even the lowest rated on his team, and a lot better than Gonchar (at -20)....
Housley was 39 and done last year. (the Leafs knew it was a gamble and that is why they didn't give up anything to get him)torex said:this trade reminds of the Leafs picking up Housley last year.