late term abortion

Because you're literally asking a question that I thought has an obvious answer. I'm surprised this is the place to ask about it. It's pretty much a non issue in Canada, that Trump is ranting about like it's an epidemic in the USA. Hillary did explain that she thinks the government has no right to say what a women should do in regards to her body and family. She spoke about how it's still important to have a choice should something go terribly wrong with your health or the baby's. Having a late term abortion is horrific and not something to be taken lightly for any parent/woman carrying a child. So that's why I posted the article saying that doctors refuse to do this in Canada unless there is a medical reason to save the mother. It's not something that is promoted or condoned. It seems rather ridiculous to me to be so worried that because we don't have a law about it it must be happening frequently like it would be no big deal or not need a medical reason to do so. I'm pro choice, but I seriously doubt many pro choicers would be pro late term abortion as a casual thing. Obviously if it's that close to being born adoption at the very least is a much safer and more humane option than late term abortion for those who changed their mind but had no medical issues. As a woman I wanted to say something to speak from a female perspective who could put herself in the shoes of a woman facing that choice. It makes me sick that Trump is using late term abortion as a reason he wants to overthrow roe v wade, and people need to be careful they understand what the medical community promote and offer. Late term abortion isn't likely being done without a serious medical reason necessitating it.
Charlotte the above puts it quite well for what is the actual situation in both the U.S.A. and Canada.
 
I don't think this is true. My understanding is that Canada actually has a reasonably high rate of abortions in the 18-21 month timeframe that corresponds to the 18-20 month point at which the gender of the fetus is reliably detectable by ultrasound, due to demographic/ethnographic factors.

It is true that there is very little in the third trimester in Canada due to ethical restrictions imposed by doctors.
You mean weeks since we are not discussing elephants ;)
 
... What the fuck did I say about canada?

ill wait...

Fine. If you want to talk about the US, how about responding to the comments below instead of just parroting Trump.

...
Besides, not only is it illegal in the vast majority of the US (except where the mother's life is at risk) it is constitutionally the jurisdiction of the State, not the Federal government.
 
I don't think this is true. My understanding is that Canada actually has a reasonably high rate of abortions in the 18-21 month timeframe that corresponds to the 18-20 month point at which the gender of the fetus is reliably detectable by ultrasound, due to demographic/ethnographic factors.

It is true that there is very little in the third trimester in Canada due to ethical restrictions imposed by doctors.
Perhaps it's only the hospitals who won't go passed 2nd trimester. Abortion clinics, maybe as they aren't regulated as well
 
I am sure I am going to get slammed for my own beliefs......I think the choice was made before having sex, and I don't agree with abortion.

Everyone's entitled to their opinion, and shouldn't be shamed for it.

There is no perfect solution for this, but I think allowing abortions right up until before birth is the least worst option. I say "least worst" instead of best, because it's still pretty horrible. Right at conception you can consider the embryo its own separate life form, with all the potential of any human being. It can be rough on the father as he can have no say in whether his potential daughter or son sees the light of day. On the flip side, carrying to term an unwanted child can obviously be rough on the mother. Like I said, there's no perfect solution, not even a good one. But as it tends to affect the mother more than anyone else...that's what tips it in my opinion. But only just.
 
Men shouldnt have an opinion on abortion. Certainly shouldnt decide it. Until you can pop a baby out of your caulk you shouldnt say a damn word about it.
 
Men shouldnt have an opinion on abortion. Certainly shouldnt decide it. Until you can pop a baby out of your caulk you shouldnt say a damn word about it.
Of course its not a mans decision for a woman to have an abortion. But to say men aren't entitled to an opinion about the creation of life is ridiculous. But its perfectly ok for a woman to decide if a man lives the rest of his life with the tip of his dick cut off. Gotta love equality.
 
I'm sorry but this is a very ignorant thing to say, and with a statement so blunt and short you are precluding any other consideration, complication and issue. What about in cases of saving the mother's life when a baby is dying or cannot survive and she is also facing health risks? Or do you think doctors should let both the baby and mother die if there are complications from pregnancy to be "fair"? Often the patient is not going to have the final say, doctors are in the business of saving lives, and they will save whichever is most viable and do their best.

I think there are two separate issues here really....the one you describe Charlotte, and the choice to abort the child for other reasons.

I do agree that in the case where the fetus can endanger the life of the mother, a choice needs to be made. Even some times in the case of rape.

IMHO, other abortions should not be conducted.....the 'woman's choice' came when she chose to have sex with out proper protection. Yes, perhaps she is taking it, or the condom broke, but its like driving a car without accepting responsibility for the risks.
 
I was a bit surprised(forgive my ignorance) to hear that an abortion can be performed within just days of delivery. I always assumed an abortion was done within the first term, but after full term (39 weeks) abortion was out of the question and if the baby must come out it was by cesarean. Im all for a womans decision to abort her pregnancy its her body her decision. But if she carries the baby through the full term stage and the baby is fully developed but not due can she decide to abort the pregnancy even if she and the baby are perfectly healthy?
I mean if the child is fully developed and premature but can still begin its life outside the mother what is the difference between killing a baby in the operating room and one inside an incubator? One is an abortion the other is murder because they are in different rooms.

Are you for, or against abortion? or at what stage should a line be crossed where abortion is no longer an option?

The rule in the past was if the baby was at risk kill the mother. Now the mother has the right to try to live and sacrifice the baby Late term abortions are typically this kind of choice.
 
Men shouldnt have an opinion on abortion. Certainly shouldnt decide it. Until you can pop a baby out of your caulk you shouldnt say a damn word about it.
Men do get dragged in on paying for a baby.
A man might want the option to withdraw from fathering the baby too.
 
Let face facts here.

this is not about late term abortion.
not really mothers health
those issues are obvious and understandable.


But vast vast vast majority of abortions...at anytime.... Are done for convenience...birth control so to speak
 
Hang on here, WHY is this on her only? You guys do realize how much more often women are raped by men, than women rape men, how much more often women are drugged, pressured, pleaded with to have sex with a guy who says "just the tip", "i'll pull out I swear" etc. This is on BOTH people.

I agree with your comments about rape, drugs etc etc., and the responsibility does lie on both parties.

Wrt religious and boys convincing girls they can't get pregnant the first time, we aren't living in the dark ages. There is so much information available to inform people about sex, pregnancy etc. The internet has a lot of information on it - and that information is available to religious folk too.

Kids are learning about sex long before 14 now. It is part of school curriculum. My gf's children are 8 and 10, and are both learning a little bit about sex.

It may sound harsh, but why is it the child's fault the mom couldn't afford birth control? And, there is assistance available for low income to get drugs too.

I personally see it as another form of birth control, as fmahovalich posted. I am not suggesting all abortion is wrong, and don't agree with Trump's position.
 
We are very very lucky in Canada. 3rd world countries and people living in low income areas in the USA do not have the options that we do. Employers don't want to cover birth control, planned parenthood clinics are being shut down everywhere, some people really are unable to pay for birth control or get anything other than condoms. And unless a guy is willing to wear a condom himself, it's not always on the women to blame her for getting pregnant.

Republicans are constantly trying to defund planned parenthood and limit women's ability to get birth control in general BECAUSE many of them are anti abortion. So this is a very scary situation, when they want to control women to the point of not wanting them to have sex at all unless they want to have a baby.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/house-votes-defund-planned-parenthood

Planned parenthood centres are closing reducing the access many women have to getting birth control/women's health services
http://liveactionnews.org/23-planned-parenthood-centers-closed-in-2015-survey-finds/

I have never advocated putting all the responsibility on the woman. It takes two and both need to take responsibility. I know you're thinking 'what if the guy doesn't take responsibility?' - that is the risk the woman accepted.

I do understand your points. But these people have chosen to have sex, and like getting in a car, doing drugs, or smoking, there can be consequences. To say the government is closing this and that is passing the buck.

Its just my opinion, but people need to take responsibility when they willingly have sex. If you can't accept the responsibility - don't do it.
 
The rule in the past was if the baby was at risk kill the mother. Now the mother has the right to try to live and sacrifice the baby Late term abortions are typically this kind of choice.
However, I am well aware of situations fifty or sixty years ago, in which expecting parents deliberately chose not to have their child in a better rated Roman Catholic Hospital because it was the official policy of such hospitals to always attempt to save the child at the expense of the mother.

Lest there be the slightest doubt I am not saying that this was (or is) a simple choice

Further it should be stressed that in both the U.S.A. and Canada third trimester abortions are exceedingly rare
 
We are privileged, so I don't want to agree to take away rights for those who are underprivileged, poor, uneducated, or put in another horrible situation that is all. The government should not mandate taking away options.

I agree, but some would argue the fetus has rights too.....but that's a whole other discussion.

If you don't agree with abortion that's fine, but there's no reason to force others in different situations to agree that you are right.

I am not forcing anything on anyone. I simply stated my opinion. If you read my posts, I don't disagree with all abortion - just the ones that are a means of birth control.

I think everyone is all up in arms like most abortions are happening because of lazy or reckless women and the fault is only on them. And as a man I'm sure that even though there is much information out there and talk in the media, it just doesn't resonate with you as much. As a woman it would affect me if the government controlled what i was allowed to do with my body, so it's important to me to have rights for myself and I can empathize with women who would want those rights -even for different reasons than I do.

It doesn't resonate with most men, because women have more to lose than the male does. He can simply walk away, and she is left with the legacy.

Somehow, men need to be held more responsible for their actions in this regard.
 
Perhaps it's only the hospitals who won't go passed 2nd trimester. Abortion clinics, maybe as they aren't regulated as well

1) Basing your opinion on 'perhaps' and 'maybe'?

2) Abortion clinics in Canada are very well regulated.
 
In general abortions are a poor option but the alternatives are often worse. Canada has reasonable restrictions on abortions to take the plus and minus into consideration.
 
1) Basing your opinion on 'perhaps' and 'maybe'?

2) Abortion clinics in Canada are very well regulated.
No I'm basing my opinion on personal experience. An ex girlfriend tried to have one done at the hospital and they wouldn't touch her passed 16 weeks, Morgan Tyler took her.