It says we're fucked.Really? I'm against the Dem Leadership when they act like Sinema and Manchin. In this case they aren't.
But what does it say if the bills fail?
And yes, I have been genuinely (but pleasantly) surprised here.
Given your previous behavior and expressed preferences, I would not have expected it.
This was 100% a shot at you since this attitude and idea is pretty clearly part of what has driven her entire political career and her history as a third party supporter who is against the Dem establishment so mirrors your expressed preferences.He was repeating my sig line. The final sentence was a backhand at me. I called him on it. Read his post he says she can do what she wants. Basically he is purposefully misinterpreting my sig for a cheap shot.
And won't admit she should not be a member of the Democrats.
As for "won't admit she should not be a member of the Democrats", you misunderstand me. I am 100% in agreement she shouldn't be in office as a Democrat.
What I am trying to point out to you is that the Democrats can't remove her.
They have no power to do so. Anyone can declare themselves a member of any party.
The Democratic Senators have no mechanism for removing someone who was elected as a Democrat from their caucus.
If, as you seem convinced, she has been paid off and is acting as a Trojan Horse then they don't actually have any way to stop it (other than assassinating her, I suppose).
Even if they did have a mechanism, what concrete advantage does it give them to do it? If they force her out, the Republicans immediately get formal control of the Senate, which means they can even do less than they can do now.
They can't even stop her from running as a Democrat. Not really. The leadership can support a primary opponent. That's about it. If she runs as a Democrat and the Democratic party voters vote her in, then she goes back. That's 4 years from now anyway so they can't do anything about her before then.