Smokin body ...D cups too!jost said:
video killed the radio star...shack said:She is hot. It's too bad that so many "singers" nowadays make it based on looks and style rather than, god forbid, actual singing talent.
Ditto. Would there be this amount of hype if the subject matter of the song were different? Doubt it...The Cunning Linguist said:"effing hot" - no
"hot" - no
kinda cute - yes
don't look like D cups to me.
one hit wonder novelty song.
Here Here....I bet if she was on american idol good old simon would boot her off asap.herames said:god she can't song with a shit live
As do I, however I'll disagree that she doesn't have musical talent. For one, she has a powerful voice, which is rare in this day when almost everyone relies on sound engineers to make them sound potable. Also, she doesn't go off-key, although her choice of improv during that live performance could have been better. I'd attribute it to inexperience.Bobzilla said:Ditto. Would there be this amount of hype if the subject matter of the song were different? Doubt it...
I like her looks...very much my type...but she is just being sold on looks...If she can sing like Martha Davis of "the Motels" than she will heat up things beyond looksdreamblade said:As for her looks, I wouldn't kick her out of bed. She's quite doable, although not in the league of Meagan Fox, Anita Dark, or Jennifer Korbin. For any of those 3, I'd sell my soul.
Actually, I have to agree 100% with Mlam here: she honestly isn't any better looking (and far WORSE looking) than many of the women I've dated and chased. She is average at best.21pro said:aside from the tittie debate,
she's actually a qualified singer as for those who say her celebrity is based only on looks:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katy_Perry
she's a former gospel singer and grew up in music production.
i don't care for her voice much, but she's artistically more tonal than say someone like Pink, who is neither a great singer or good looking.