katy perry is effing hott!!

She is hot. It's too bad that so many "singers" nowadays make it based on looks and style rather than, god forbid, actual singing talent.
 
yeah, after seeing her I wanted to fuck the shit out of her .... but you could say that about thousands of women ... maybe millions :D
 
shack said:
She is hot. It's too bad that so many "singers" nowadays make it based on looks and style rather than, god forbid, actual singing talent.

video killed the radio star...
 
The Cunning Linguist said:
"effing hot" - no

"hot" - no

kinda cute - yes

don't look like D cups to me.

one hit wonder novelty song.

Ditto. Would there be this amount of hype if the subject matter of the song were different? Doubt it...
 
herames said:
god she can't song with a shit live

Here Here....I bet if she was on american idol good old simon would boot her off asap.

Sorry, just another example of a "product" being hyped by a record company.....
 
Bobzilla said:
Ditto. Would there be this amount of hype if the subject matter of the song were different? Doubt it...

As do I, however I'll disagree that she doesn't have musical talent. For one, she has a powerful voice, which is rare in this day when almost everyone relies on sound engineers to make them sound potable. Also, she doesn't go off-key, although her choice of improv during that live performance could have been better. I'd attribute it to inexperience.

As for her looks, I wouldn't kick her out of bed. She's quite doable, although not in the league of Meagan Fox, Anita Dark, or Jennifer Korbin. For any of those 3, I'd sell my soul.
 
dreamblade said:
As for her looks, I wouldn't kick her out of bed. She's quite doable, although not in the league of Meagan Fox, Anita Dark, or Jennifer Korbin. For any of those 3, I'd sell my soul.

I like her looks...very much my type...but she is just being sold on looks...If she can sing like Martha Davis of "the Motels" than she will heat up things beyond looks
 
Sweet Lord...

....you guys need help.

There is no way on God's earth those are "DD"'s. Having been married to a "D" and "DD", and currently having a "DD" FWB, I can tell you this for a fact. They say men know NOTHING about women's clothing and lingere, and you are sure proving it here.

Also, she is by no stretch of the imagination "hot". She is not ugly, and she is more than attractive enough for me. But she is no better looking than 30 or 40% of the women you'd see on any given day downtown who are within 5 years of her age.

"Amazon" has it right...you guys are just fools for the hype...
 
Last edited:
aside from the tittie debate,

she's actually a qualified singer as for those who say her celebrity is based only on looks:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katy_Perry

she's a former gospel singer and grew up in music production.

i don't care for her voice much, but she's artistically more tonal than say someone like Pink, who is neither a great singer or good looking.
 
21pro said:
aside from the tittie debate,

she's actually a qualified singer as for those who say her celebrity is based only on looks:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katy_Perry

she's a former gospel singer and grew up in music production.

i don't care for her voice much, but she's artistically more tonal than say someone like Pink, who is neither a great singer or good looking.

Actually, I have to agree 100% with Mlam here: she honestly isn't any better looking (and far WORSE looking) than many of the women I've dated and chased. She is average at best.

As for her being a former gospel singer, doesn't mean she was a GOOD gospel singer. Sorry, I may be judging her harshly by that one video but IMO she is a less than average singer and not as good as many of the runner ups on American Idol. Heck, that video that was floating around from America's Got Talent there was that little 12 yr old that blows the doors off her......

And yes, comparing the released version of the song, and that video, the released version had a shit load of effects on it.