Jimmy Kimmel Show is back! Sinclair & Nexstar backs down TACO style

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
14,586
9,009
113
Here's the thing...I suspect that there will be viewers in those markets who will let their feelings be known. And there will be advertisers who will be pissed, because the "special news" program they aired instead of Kimmel was dryer than toast. I am willing to bet both Sinclair and Newstar will re-air Kimmel in the near future. Mind you, both are looking for the FCC to approve mergers and other deals, so it might take until those things are finalized...
Like all execs and the investment bankers who get rich off mergers and acquisitions, Sinclair, Newstar's and Tegna's principals, execs and investors have huge short term personal financial motivations far more important than a blip in viewership or advertising. They, like all people involved in M&A's, make big bonus', commissions and fees when the deals close.

And it often incurs big fees and costs if the deal falls apart. Tegna probably insisted and got a "Breakup Fee" included in the contract when Nexstar came a courtin'. That is common when a company approaches another with a buyout or merger that the target company believes is not going to be successful because of regulatory hurdles.

Among other things, this is but one of the many behind the scenes factors that play a FAR bigger factor than the general public even knows how these things work. It's not just about short term advertising.


Example: Attempted BCE Privatization

Remember when a group including a bunch of US private equity firms and Ontario Teachers Pension Fund tried to take Bell Canada Enterprises private for $30 billion?

Bell initially said no thanks. They knew the deal wouldn't be approved by the Competition Bureau among other things. The private equity firms said not to worry, that they could make it work and were willing to take their chances. Bell said, 'fine... knock your socks off... but if this turns out to be a waste of our time, you will have to pay a $1.2 billion dollar breakup fee'.

Sure enough, the deal fell through. Bell asked for their breakup fee and the private equity weasels tried to get out of it. The matter was eventually settled out of court.


"A legal fight looms between BCE Inc. and its would-be purchasers over the issue of a $1.2 billion breakup fee after the $52-billion proposed privatization of Canada's largest telecommunications company was officially declared dead on Thursday."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
14,586
9,009
113
It wasn't a business decision.
The definition of free speech, is that you are able to criticize the government, without being persecuted by the government.
In this case Kimmel criticized the President, and was threatened by the head of the regulatory agency who was appointed by the President, and subsequently suspended.
This qualifies as state censorship and if allowed to stand would have been a breach of the 1st amendment.

Actually It was a business decision. A business decision forced by the Trump Administration's threat to derail a proposed merger if those ABC affiliates would not shut Kimmel up.

So therefore it was also a governmental violation of the First Amendment as it was the government's direct and implied threats that led to the very specific pre-empting of the show by ONLY those ABC affiliates who were seeking the government's approval to override their own rules to facilitate an otherwise illegal deal.
 

bggolfingmaniac

Well-known member
Aug 24, 2023
193
283
63
Actually It was a business decision. A business decision forced by the Trump Administration's threat to derail a proposed merger if those ABC affiliates would not shut Kimmel up.

So therefore it was also a governmental violation of the First Amendment as it was the government's direct and implied threats that led to the very specific pre-empting of the show by ONLY those ABC affiliates who were seeking the government's approval to override their own rules to facilitate an otherwise illegal deal.
Someone else says it here often, and I'll repeat it - 3 words that define the Trump administration - FOLLOW THE MONEY
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
14,586
9,009
113
A whiny comedian getting suspended for a few days for making off colour remarks and telling an outright lie even though he claims he has "fact checkers" on staff that go through his jokes to make sure they are accurate is not state level censorship is not even close to the levels of censorship thst exist in communist china.

Bannning the numbers 6 and 4 together is state level censorship.

Having to flee the country or going to jail for selling books is state level censorship.

Being disappeared and having your family on day and night surveillance for unveiling a banner is state level censorship.

You guys whine so much.




Those are the draconian levels of censorship that evolve from small acts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
42,131
8,926
113
Trump must be in a fit of rage. Not only did Jimmy Kimmel roast him, then Robert De Niro shows up and gives him a thorough stinkface.


What ties Trump's shorts in a knot, De Niro may be richer than he is...and he looks fitter than Keith Richards.

 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

Birf

I done told you
May 29, 2025
143
153
43
Trump must be in a fit of rage. Not only did Jimmy Kimmel roast him, then Robert De Niro shows up and gives him a thorough stinkface.


What ties Trump's shorts in a knot, De Niro may be richer than he is...and he looks fitter than Keith Richards.

That skit is considered funny?
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
29,439
7,192
113
It wasn't a business decision.
The definition of free speech, is that you are able to criticize the government, without being persecuted by the government.
In this case Kimmel criticized the President, and was threatened by the head of the regulatory agency who was appointed by the President, and subsequently suspended.
This qualifies as state censorship and if allowed to stand would have been a breach of the 1st amendment
Cry me a river.
Its hilarious that the shoe is now on the other foot and Lefties are getting a taste of cancel culture.
I wonder who will be next :unsure:
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
101,845
28,765
113
A whiny comedian getting suspended for a few days for making off colour remarks and telling an outright lie even though he claims he has "fact checkers" on staff that go through his jokes to make sure they are accurate is not state level censorship is not even close to the levels of censorship thst exist in communist china.

Bannning the numbers 6 and 4 together is state level censorship.

Having to flee the country or going to jail for selling books is state level censorship.

Being disappeared and having your family on day and night surveillance for unveiling a banner is state level censorship.

You guys whine so much.



Nobody can take any of that seriously until you acknowledge the threat of MAGA censorship, Palantir spying and ICE disappearances.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

40micmic

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2014
876
540
93
Nobody can take any of that seriously until you acknowledge the threat of MAGA censorship, Palantir spying and ICE disappearances.
???? So you dont think censorshop in China is a problem.

You really hate the west that much...🤦
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
14,586
9,009
113
Here's the thing...I suspect that there will be viewers in those markets who will let their feelings be known. And there will be advertisers who will be pissed, because the "special news" program they aired instead of Kimmel was dryer than toast. I am willing to bet both Sinclair and Newstar will re-air Kimmel in the near future. Mind you, both are looking for the FCC to approve mergers and other deals, so it might take until those things are finalized...
Kimmmel time slot advertisers will simply not run their ads during that time-slot, or do so at drastically reduced rates. And viewers won't watch an old episode of Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom!
 
  • Like
Reactions: silentkisser

40micmic

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2014
876
540
93
No, censorship in China is horrific.
But somehow you like to praise LEDs on buildings and ignore the hundred of infrastructure projects that have failed and killed 100s if not 1000s but are censored within their great firewall.

Any level of censorship that you feel is happening here is not even a fraction of what goes in communist china
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
14,586
9,009
113
A whiny comedian getting suspended for a few days for making off colour remarks and telling an outright lie even though he claims he has "fact checkers" on staff that go through his jokes to make sure they are accurate is not state level censorship is not even close to the levels of censorship thst exist in communist china.
You mean a comedian making jokes for years about the most thin-skinned whiny public figure in our lifetime?

And what exactly is the "outright" lie Kimmel told? What exact words were a lie?
 

40micmic

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2014
876
540
93
You mean a comedian making jokes for years about the most thin-skinned whiny public figure in our lifetime?

And what exactly is the "outright" lie Kimmel told? What exact words were a lie?
"One of their own"

There is enough in the actual reporting available to everyone before he made this comment to know this is incorrect especially since he has a team of "fact checkers".
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
14,586
9,009
113
But somehow you like to praise LEDs on buildings and ignore the hundred of infrastructure projects that have failed and killed 100s if not 1000s but are censored within their great firewall.

Any level of censorship that you feel is happening here is not even a fraction of what goes in communist china
Why are you dismissing the clear incremental infringements on freedom of speech and outright statements of extrajudicial, unconstitutional actions of the President of the United States by trying to minimize them by comparisons to China? If you are so (justly) opposed to what is happening in China, why are you not opposed to the start of the same in USA?

Authoritarians do not start out with full bore opression. Not even Hitler, Xi or Putin did that.

Trump is actually the first wannabe Dictator that admitted he wants to be one, on Day One.

Slowly cooking frogs from cold water room to boiling reduces the amount of frogs from jumping out in time.
 
Toronto Escorts