It's not CO2 as Climate alarmists claim, it's Nitrogen

[roddermac]

You will go to your grave uttering oil&gas industry propaganda.
You're aiding the greatest crime against humanity ever.

The last 4 years was the greatest crime against humanity excluding all government acts of genocide which you seem to have forgotten.

 

[JohnLarue]

Is that where you live?

You ran away again.
You can't answer to explain why the climate is changing just as much as scientists told you it would.

climate has always changed and is expected to continue changing



here is a scientist for you

John F. Clauser
American physicist who was awarded the 2022 Nobel Prize for Physics

What did John Clauser say about climate change?

He cycled through a PowerPoint presentation that began with the exclamation: “Great news! There is no climate crisis!” “Much as it may upset many people, my message is the planet is not in peril,”

see good news , you should be relived
instead you will be outraged you have been played for a fool and then outraged an exceptionally intelligent authority figure has challenged the narrative you foolishly choose to determine your lifestyle

The 2022 Nobel Prize for Physics- an award for brilliant/ genius scientists

John Clauser has more to say

“The popular narrative about climate change reflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people. Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience. In turn, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills. It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists. In my opinion, there is no real climate crisis. There is, however, a very real problem with providing a decent standard of living to the world’s large population and an associated energy crisis. The latter is being unnecessarily exacerbated by what, in my opinion, is

incorrect climate science.”

btw physics is science
number noodling computer data sets to try to get a pre-determined conclusion is not science

i can provide more scientists who are alarmed by the false pseudoscience

what were the names of the scientists that you blindly trust?
oh you don't know ,
so really you are are blindly placing your trust in the ....... propaganda you have been fed

how pathetic

 

[JohnLarue]

Clauser is not a climatologist. He's a physicist who is now also a paid lobbyist for the oil industry.
You only accept the word of oil lobbyists.

unfounded character assassination of a brilliant scientist from an ignorant high school drop out
your go-to does not work and only highlights your character flaws.

here is a climatologist for you



Richard Siegmund Lindzen (born February 8, 1940) is an American atmospheric physicist known for his work in the dynamics of the middle atmosphere, atmospheric tides, and ozone photochemistry. He is the author of more than 200 scientific papers. From 1972 to 1982, he served as the Gordon McKay Professor of Dynamic Meteorology at Harvard University. In 1983, he was appointed as the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he would remain until his retirement in 2013.[2][1]

he was also a IPCC contributor until he resigned in disgust of the corruption

IPCC activities[edit]

Lindzen worked on Chapter 7 of 2001 IPCC Working Group 1, which considers the physical processes that are active in real world climate. He had previously been a contributor to Chapter 4 of the 1995 "IPCC Second Assessment". He described the full 2001 IPCC report as "an admirable description of research activities in climate science"[60] although he criticized the Summary for Policymakers. Lindzen stated in May 2001 that it did not truly summarize the IPCC report[61] but had been amended to state more definite conclusions.[62] He also emphasized the fact that the summary had not been written by scientists alone. The NAS panel on which Lindzen served says that the summary was the result of dialogue between scientists and policymakers.[c]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lindzen#cite_note-66

too bad for you Frankfooter, your evil con game is failing

 

[JohnLarue]

Is that where you live?

You ran away again.
You can't answer to explain why the climate is changing just as much as scientists told you it would.

climate has always changed and is expected to continue changing

as much as scientists told you it would.

number noodling and manipulating data to arrive at a pre-determined conclusion is not science

here is another real scientist for you




'We found it difficult to discern warming trends that are not located in rapidly developing urban areas"

the surface temperature record data set is a mess
and was used by the climate scam artists to create a lot of false and very irresponsible propaganda

propaganda you expect me to explain

get lost

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

First it was CO2, now its nitrogen, and next week it'll be hydrogen

 

[Skoob]

First it was CO2, now its nitrogen, and next week it'll be hydrogen

...and then rhododendron...those evil flowers.

 

[moredale7]

how hugely is it?

It's the hugeliest

 

[moredale7]

north shore plesistocene brine aquifer recharge cycle

north shore plesistocene brine aquifer recharge cycle

I jerked off to this

 

[Frankfooter]

What did John Clauser say about climate change?

Who cares, he's a physicist now collecting money from the oil&gas industry as a board member of the CO2 Coalition.
He has never studied the climate.

Do you back this quote of his?
Clauser spoke at a press conference hosted by the Deposit of Faith Coalition,12 a group that declares “those pushing the anti-God and anti-family climate agenda need to be called out and exposed.”13

unfounded character assassination of a brilliant scientist from an ignorant high school drop out

You continually assassinate the character of the 99.9% of scientists who back the work represented by the IPCC.

Richard Siegmund Lindzen

This is what Lindzen said in 2018
October 2018

“Warming of any significance ceased about 20 years ago,” Lindzen claimed in a lecture at the Global Warming Policy Foundation.24

Do you believe Lindzen on this claim?

You picked people who have never studied the science, have never published works on the climate and have no theories about why the planet is warming. Meanwhile you ignore the vast, vast majority of scientists who support the IPCC and the vast amounts of evidence in the form of global temperature, CO2 levels, sea levels, sea temps, glacial melt and polar melts.

 

[JohnLarue]

So yeah, like CO2 these seemingly harmless common gases that are vital for us to live this moment, can also kill us if the balance and pressures are even so slightly off.

if you get them in you blood stream yes they will cause or inhibit a chemical / biological processes which can be deadly

floating around in atmosphere in quantities of parts per million , parts per billion ? No
small quantities do not move the needle on physical processes, absorption of infrared radiation is a physical process

btw CO2 is the molecule of life
below 150 ppm , plants die and then all other life dies

 

[HungSowel]

The biggest source of manmade N2O is internal combustion engines however catalytic converters were mandated which break down N2O into its elementary constituents. The mandate for catalytic converters had nothing to do with climate change, it had to do with acid rain as oxides of nitrous when mixed with water create nitric acid.

Normally Nitrous Oxide is not created during the combustion process of a gasoline engine, only during times when there is excessive heat and pressure and lack of fuel is Nitrogen forced to bond with Oxygen. In Diesel engines which is based on the detonation (explosion) of fuel rather than combustion, Nitrous oxide is a regular emission.

 

[basketcase]

how hugely is it?

Have you never learned any chemistry?

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b03631

 

[Frankfooter]

btw CO2 is the molecule of life
below 150 ppm , plants die and then all other life dies

Wait, now you're arguing CO2 levels are really important?