Israel is in a no win. If they sank the ships, the Palestinians get a PR victory (evil Israelis). If they attempt to peacefully intervene and fail, the Palestinians get a PR victory (weak Israelis). Attempting a peaceful intervention that turns violent, the Palestinians get a PR victory (evil Israelis). If they let them through, the Palestinians get a PR victory (weak Israelis). If they stop blockading Gaza with violent Hamas still in control, the Palestinians get a PR victory (weak Israelis). If they continue the blockade, the Palestinians get a PR victory (evil Israelis).And that is why they f**ked up. Israel, of all countries, to come unprepared like this is shocking. They should have known that physical resistance was almost guaranteed.
Because the Arab states tend to be anti-western? If they didn't have Israel as a scapegoat, they would be left just blaming the US for everything.Why would you nuke so many countries in the ME when nuking just one would solve all the problems?
Greater ROI.
Have you considered the option, that the EU has been calling for, namely to lift this blakade of Gaza?Israel is in a no win. If they sank the ships, the Palestinians get a PR victory (evil Israelis). If they attempt to peacefully intervene and fail, the Palestinians get a PR victory (weak Israelis). Attempting a peaceful intervention that turns violent, the Palestinians get a PR victory (evil Israelis). If they let them through, the Palestinians get a PR victory (weak Israelis). If they stop blockading Gaza with violent Hamas still in control, the Palestinians get a PR victory (weak Israelis). If they continue the blockade, the Palestinians get a PR victory (evil Israelis).
Since the Palestinians don't seem to be subjected to or care about negative press, the best Israel can accomplish is not getting screwed to bad.
Someone on TV said that Israel could have "disable" the ships. Is that true? I think these "activists" are simply pawns of the terrorists and too naive to know they are being played.If they sank the ships,
Fuji just said that there is a valid reason for the blockade (keep weapons from entering Gaza).namely to lift this blakade of Gaza?
If Israel is backed into a corner and is going down, they will take an awful lot of Arabs with them. Is that what the "international community" and the "activists" wants?Pray that America supports Israel forever, because the instant that it stops, the charade is over.
Please re-read what I wrote. That's in there. Lifting the blockade would be claimed as a victory of the armed resistance and only encourage further violence just like Israel pulling out of Gaza did.Have you considered the option, that the EU has been calling for, namely to lift this blakade of Gaza?
They were fooled into thinking that pro-Palestinian protesters could be peaceful, whereas in fact probably all pro-Palestinian protesters should be treated as terrorist fighters.WTF happened to the IDF? This has to be the most inept raid ever performed by anybody. If they had been as inept on July 4, 1976, not a single passenger on that jet in Entebbe would have survived.
Oh lickspittle, you share the Zionist addiction to violence. That's the only solution Zionism has to anything.They were fooled into thinking that pro-Palestinian protesters could be peaceful, whereas in fact probably all pro-Palestinian protesters should be treated as terrorist fighters.
Reports from the organizers of the flotilla say that. Video of the event says different. The organizers lied to you.Reports are saying that Isreali soldiers were firing before boarding ships.
Since when? Citation needed.The blockade is collective punishment, which is against the Geneva Conventions.
According to WHICH part of the UN? Not according to the UNSC. Maybe according to some biased lickspittle like UNRWA.According to the UN, only one quarter of the necessary food is getting in.
Bullshit. Utter bullshit. You CANNOT substantiate that with a valid reference. Maybe UNRWA :rollseyes:10% of the children in Gaza are stunted, are malformed to do continuing malnutrition from this blockade.
http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/CB9A27EF05BB52408525759F0061B366Since when? Citation needed.
According to WHICH part of the UN? Not according to the UNSC. Maybe according to some biased lickspittle like UNRWA.
Bullshit. Utter bullshit. You CANNOT substantiate that with a valid reference. Maybe UNRWA :rollseyes:
.
Well, as Aardvark 154 mentioned already, it has to be an attack on a state owned ship (warship) not a civilian ship registered in a NATO country.And just for fun. What happens if Turkey calls on NATO and says, Israel has attacked one of our ships in International waters?
Turkey said the next round of ships will have military escorts.
Will Israel attack NATO next?
They might have metal bars and slingshots?
http://news.antiwar.com/2010/05/31/turkey-future-gaza-aid-ships-will-have-military-escorts/
You're argument of universal human rights is farcical. Give me one Islamic country where these exist? Not even close. You demonize Israel but their record on human rights is leagues higher than any of their Arab neighbours.Oh lickspittle, you share the Zionist addiction to violence. That's the only solution Zionism has to anything.
Universal human rights scares zionists to the core. It is contrary to the fundamental ethos of Zionism.