Clear warning. Will Hamas man up and face the IDF? Or as usual hide under the women folk's skirts? And place children in front of them?
No, that is not what Deif said.The long and short of it is that it was revenge for Israeli crimes and to put an end to them.
But revenge itself was the wrong path for them to go down. A classic case of two wrongs don't make a right.
Palestine needs a Gandhi or a Mandela. The only way Palestine can win politically is to have moral superiority. Which they don't have now unfortunately.
Or will they run like the IDF did?
Clear warning. Will Hamas man up and face the IDF? Or as usual hide under the women folk's skirts? And place children in front of them?
This is the same brainwashed hate speech we always hear.It's always the same speech....
"Israel has pushed us too far. The poor Palestinian people are angry for good reason. We have been oppressed for 50 years and it is awful. Here are photos of dead children. Share our anger."
It's a 1-note symphony that goes on and on and on.
Lol. As I said. Just wait.Or will they run like the IDF did?
Why wait, they’ve already run away. Abandoning their own citizens.Lol. As I said. Just wait.
Someone has forgotten painful lessons learned by the Russians and US in Afghanistan and Vietnam.I don't think you can compare fighting in an open field/village vs fighting in a city landscape like gaza where they booby trapped very passage and shoot from every window. You'd literally have to destroy and flatten the city to take it. And then there are tunnels.
Pretty much hit it on the head.Nothing say Frank? Anyone else hating on Isreal..?? Lambs and wolves?
Let’s see what changes tomorrow…who else joins the party and how the markets respond.
Sunny days last forever.
/looks towards bank accounts.
It’s completely different than a revenge message. He talks about attempting to arrange a humanitarian deal to release Palestinian prisoners (including the 1000 plus held as hostages) that was rejected. He talked about the never ending land thefts, killings, abuse and torture. He said they had had enough and were going to put an end to what they were enduring.However many wrongs, don't make a right. And that is the problem with this entire conflict.
And that is the summary of what Deif said. Not sure why you think this guy's message is somehow more profound than what we already know.
If you have a longer video or a format post it here because this is what I could find.
Who is Mohammed Deif, the Hamas commander behind the attack on Israel?
Israel calls last week's devastating attack by Hamas its 9/11 moment. The secretive mastermind behind the assault, Palestinian militant Mohammed Deif, calls it Al Aqsa Flood.www.reuters.com
"Today the rage of Al Aqsa, the rage of our people and nation is exploding. Our mujahedeen (fighters), today is your day to make this criminal understand that his time has ended," Deif said in the recording.
Speaking in a calm voice, Deif said in his recording that Hamas had repeatedly warned Israel to stop its crimes against Palestinians, to release prisoners, whom he said were abused and tortured, and to halt its expropriation of Palestinian land.
"Every day the occupation storm our villages, towns and cities in the West Bank and raid houses, kill, injure, destroy and detain. At the same time, it confiscates thousands of acres of our land, uproots our people from their houses to build settlements while its criminal siege continues on Gaza."
Deif said Hamas had urged the international community to put an end to the "crimes of the occupation", but Israel had stepped up its provocation. He also said Hamas had in the past asked Israel for a humanitarian deal to release Palestinian prisoners, but this was rejected.
"In light of the orgy of occupation and its denial of international laws and resolutions, and in light of American and western support and international silence, we've decided to put an end to all this," he said.
No, that is legally wrong.The Israeli government is not responsible for the Palestinians. Hamas is. So what has Hamas done?
There is nowhere to flee.
Wrong again. Palestinians signed and abided by the Oslo Accords. For that they got 2 decades of stalling and half a million more settlers in what could have been Palestine.The other thing you are not addressing is, that the majority of the representatives of Palestine have never resorted to peaceful means in this entire conflict. From day 1, in 1948 till today, the first and only method of fighting for freedom, has been violence, mass murder and terrorism. With some talks and other attempts at peaceful resolution thrown in. Its the same with Israel, but let us only talk about Palestine for now, because bringing Israel in, then becomes an exercise in whataboutism.
Mandrill, you could do the decency of getting views from Palestinians about Gaza and Hamas, instead of Israeli supporters. Its not hard.(15) Why did Hamas think attacking nuclear-armed and USA-allied Israel would be a good idea? - Quora
Desperation.
For years, the Arab states have been moving towards normalizing relations with Israel. Hamas counts upon the support of Arab states, both material and financial, to exist since it has very limited means of its own.
Normalized Arab-Israeli relations would be the coup de grace for Hamas and the “Palestinian liberation” movement. Because a precondition of normalized relations with Israel would be ceasing support to Hamas.
Part of the reason why Arab states were warming up to Israel was that Arab leaders have been losing faith in the Palestinian forces for decades now, and an improvement for the Palestinians was nowhere in sight.
Regardless of where you stand on this conflict, it's hard to argue that Palestinian forces have had much in the way of success recently (or ever, for that matter), having lost land to Israel almost continuously since Israel's inception. The reasons for this are not surprising. Palestine isn't really even a nation at this point, it's two paltry strips of impoverished land run by a corrupt elite and barely educated militants with no resources of their own. They are facing a prosperous, well-organized nation-state with a highly competent military and the direct support of the world's premier powers. It was never going to turn out well for them.
Whether you agree with the above diagram or not, it is what the Palestinians have always proposed as their version of what has happened to them. So even they admit their total failure against the Israelis.
And I suppose the Arabs were tired of tying their money up in so clearly a lost cause. Oh sure, they still outwardly broadcast support for Palestine for religious reasons and internal appeasement (most Arab Muslims are extremely against any rapprochement with Israel), but I suspect they have been planning a move away from being active stakeholders in the Israel-Palestine conflict for a while.
So why the attack from Hamas now? Well, it's an apparent attempt to sabotage the normalization of relations across the ME, which would have sounded the death knell for them. I cannot imagine the Hamas leadership would stand idle and let the war coffers they plunder empty out. So they attacked Israel, performing the attack in a way that would cause the most severe reaction from the Israelis. Massacring Jews, abducting Jews, the whole shebang! They were trying to force Israel into the largest possible retaliation against them (they might have succeeded), thereby forcing the Arab powers into taking a stance against said Israeli retaliation. That's my only explanation for this attack. Otherwise, the immediate tactical value of killing a few hundred Israeli civilians eludes me.
And it seems to have worked…for now.
Many of the Arab nations previously moving towards normalized relations with Israel have now performed a sudden U-turn, mostly for reasons of posturing (and possibly gaining leverage out of the situation). But I don't think this will last long. Some of the Gulf states didn't even openly side with Palestine this time, the UAE came out with this statement;
I imagine most Arab powers see that the writing is on the wall for Hamas. There is no possible way that, having poked the Israeli bear, Hamas can resist any Israeli counter-operation effectively. After all, the Israeli army is a world-class professional fighting force. At best, Hamas is a glorified militia fighting on very little land, wholly trapped and starved of supplies. Or, to be brief, they're f*cked.
I suppose once the Arab countries can extract some personal benefit/concession from the situation, they will perform another U-turn and return to ditching Palestine. I can see Saudi Arabia's shallow declaration of support for Hamas disappearing once the Saudis can get some security deal with the US in exchange for re-normalizing relations with Israel.
Regardless, the long-term outlook for Hamas is poor. They made a desperate, flailing attempt to “reunite the Ummah” and gain a [im]moral victory against Israel.
In time, I think they will come to regret it.
ADDENDUM:
This answer has covered the possible external motivations for Hamas's operation, but it's worth taking stock of the internal Palestinian political situation.
The President of the Palestinian State, Mahmoud Abbas, of the Fatah (فتح) party, is 87 years old, and has ruled the Gaza strip and the 167 islands of the West Bank since 2005. He is not going to live that much longer and has no clear political successor in his own party. Hamas is likely seeking an opportunity to seize power across Palestinian controlled territories by staging a grand morale victory against the Israelis. I suppose their plan was that this bold operation would give them a large political boost and the necessary support in Palestine and the Arab League to take over the reigns of power from Fatah.
And whilst the tactical situation for Hamas is kaput, the operation could be a political boon. Though what use that would be if the Israeli's conduct a ground offensive to destroy Hamas as a serious organization, is beyond me.
More BS from you.Why do Israeli Jews blame Netanyahu but you blame Palestinians?
Israel is also planning and executing acts of terrorism.Hamas is the elected government. So the elected government is not responsible for the citizenry it represents, but Israel is, while the elected government plans and executes terror attacks. And that is okay in your bizzarro world?
Then I ask you again.More BS from you.
The same as some Jews may blame Netanyahu, their leader, I blame the leaders of Palestinians, Hamas. But not the Palestinians.
Once again, intentionally misrepresenting what I said.
What, that you can't run an occupation against the native population forever?Someone has forgotten painful lessons learned by the Russians and US in Afghanistan and Vietnam.
You don't get it.I am not proposing this out of some moral leaning towards non-violence. I think it is the best political course of action for people in the position of the Palestinians. When you do not have enough military strength to win, you need to play politics cleverly to have moral superiority that you can use for political clout.
Bull.Israel retaliating now is not terrorism. It is response.
So again, I am aware of Isareli racism and injustices towards the Palestinians. The Palestinians are just as racist towards the Israelis. I believe this to be at the core of the issue. Both groups of people do not view the other as humans and are fundamentally racist and intolerant. But lets put that aside for now.
How does this particular attack by Hamas justify kidnapping babies, raping women, mass murdering unsuspecting people etc? How does that accomplish the originally stated goal to release Palestinian prisoners, prevent land thefts, killings, abuse and torture etc?
The other thing you are not addressing is, that the majority of the representatives of Palestine have never resorted to peaceful means in this entire conflict. From day 1, in 1948 till today, the first and only method of fighting for freedom, has been violence, mass murder and terrorism. With some talks and other attempts at peaceful resolution thrown in. Its the same with Israel, but let us only talk about Palestine for now, because bringing Israel in, then becomes an exercise in whataboutism.