Obsession Massage

Is Rudolph Giuliani going to fuck Trump?

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,047
2,537
113
Dutchie, remember when you predicted that the courts would overturn the 2020 election and give Trump the presidency?....

I still laugh about that. 😸
If only I had predicted that.

But enjoy all the laughs you can, even if it's based in dementia. You only live once!
 
  • Wow
Reactions: squeezer

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,153
23,098
113
I do not believe that Rudy is broke, it is just a show. He is hiding money because he has a sexual assault case against him and there may be fines involved in some of his other cases. Rudy is estimated to be wirth 25-50 million dollars. He was making $50-60,000 per speaking engagement a few years ago. He may still be making that much per appearance from the MAGA crowd.
Hard to say, I agree. He is selling his apartment.
But big tits and booze aren't cheap.
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,491
2,444
113
Contrary to your assumption, I'm not all surprised at all that Trump is up on some trumped up (pun intended) charges at this time. That's how Biden's and the DNC's weoponized DOJ rolls! Some of these DA's actually ran on the PROMISE to prosecute Trump! How could they disappoint their voters and donors?

On the theme of "the unexpected happens", I hope that means you're ready for these indictments to fall apart and/or resolve into meaningless and minor plea deals! That's what I expect, but perhaps it will come as a surprise to you.
Have you heard the tape of Drumpf's phone call to Georgia? That's proof right there that he tried to have 12000 votes fabricated..... no trumping up needed. All his charges are legit and based on the crimes the orange turd committed, as the evidence will show. His insiders all knew he was lying about "stolen elections"... why are you still duped? LOL
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,153
23,098
113
Have you heard the tape of Drumpf's phone call to Georgia? That's proof right there that he tried to have 12000 votes fabricated..... no trumping up needed. All his charges are legit and based on the crimes the orange turd committed, as the evidence will show. His insiders all knew he was lying about "stolen elections"... why are you still duped? LOL
Dutch Oven doesn't even accept that he was wrong 66 times in a row in the election litigation thread, why would he accept he's still wrong?
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,047
2,537
113
Have you heard the tape of Drumpf's phone call to Georgia? That's proof right there that he tried to have 12000 votes fabricated..... no trumping up needed. All his charges are legit and based on the crimes the orange turd committed, as the evidence will show. His insiders all knew he was lying about "stolen elections"... why are you still duped? LOL
If you heard the call and you think it proves what you say then your powers of critical thinking are weak. The statement you refer to was Trump's way of making his point that he thought the election was rigged, nothing more. If you've followed how Trump speaks (he's often sarcastic) you'd realize that. If you take his statement in the context of the entire call, it is all the more clear. Maybe you think politicians shouldn't talk the way Trump does. That's too bad for you, because they can. This claim is just dime store lawyering.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,153
23,098
113
If you heard the call and you think it proves what you say then your powers of critical thinking are weak. The statement you refer to was Trump's way of making his point that he thought the election was rigged, nothing more. If you've followed how Trump speaks (he's often sarcastic) you'd realize that. If you take his statement in the context of the entire call, it is all the more clear. Maybe you think politicians shouldn't talk the way Trump does. That's too bad for you, because they can. This claim is just dime store lawyering.
Some people can never learn.
 

jalimon

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2016
7,065
6,987
113
If you heard the call and you think it proves what you say then your powers of critical thinking are weak. The statement you refer to was Trump's way of making his point that he thought the election was rigged, nothing more. If you've followed how Trump speaks (he's often sarcastic) you'd realize that. If you take his statement in the context of the entire call, it is all the more clear. Maybe you think politicians shouldn't talk the way Trump does. That's too bad for you, because they can. This claim is just dime store lawyering.
Trump is absolutely never sarcastic. He knows very well his followers do not get sarcasm at all. These people do not grasp second degree humor and/or sarcasm. You may think he is sarcastic because it fits your belief but he is absolutely never sarcastic at all.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,047
2,537
113
Trump is absolutely never sarcastic. He knows very well his followers do not get sarcasm at all. These people do not grasp second degree humor and/or sarcasm. You may think he is sarcastic because it fits your belief but he is absolutely never sarcastic at all.
You've just revealed that you know absolutely nothing about Trump.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,047
2,537
113
Let me repeat. Trump never ever use sarcasm. He repeats his lies over and over until his cult followers believes all of them.
Why repeat, if you've already said it? Do you think that if you repeat it enough, it will be true?
 
  • Like
Reactions: morningvibe

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,584
93,245
113
If you heard the call and you think it proves what you say then your powers of critical thinking are weak. The statement you refer to was Trump's way of making his point that he thought the election was rigged, nothing more. If you've followed how Trump speaks (he's often sarcastic) you'd realize that. If you take his statement in the context of the entire call, it is all the more clear. Maybe you think politicians shouldn't talk the way Trump does. That's too bad for you, because they can. This claim is just dime store lawyering.
Absolutely, Dutch. When you get through teaching Divisional Court in Toronto how they misunderstood the law of professional associations, you can phone the senior people at the GA DA's office and help them out as well.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,047
2,537
113
Absolutely, Dutch. When you get through teaching Divisional Court in Toronto how they misunderstood the law of professional associations, you can phone the senior people at the GA DA's office and help them out as well.
There's no helping those who are pursuing this matter for political purposes, instead of because they genuinely misunderstand what happened. You can only help the public by removing such so-called public servants.

All of your arguments really just distill to - a person in authority said so - don't they? So curious!
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,735
60,957
113
I don't think ANY of Trump's indictments should be taken seriously. What are they? He hung on to some documents as souvenirs, just like every other President (and VP Biden) before him did? He didn't throw himself in front of Jan 6 protesters when Pelosi wouldn't staff the perimeter of the Capital properly? He vigorously pursued legal challenges to the election and met with those who had the authority to fully audit election complaints? These are joke indictments. And if you think I'm wrong, I guess after you're done persuading me, you've only got about 50 percent of Americans left to convince. Good luck!
That is the power of a sealed media infrastructure.
You, and a good portion of the country, have no idea what is happening and that ignorance is what they are counting on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: silentkisser

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,735
60,957
113
I hate to break it you, but you're wrong:

.
Even the DEM leaning Politico couldn't conjure up a poll where at least 50% of Americans think Trump is guilty of the indictments (and to spare myself a mind numbing response, keep in mind that in criminal matters an "I don't know" equates to a "not guilty" verdict, so the not guilty opinion reflected in this poll is over 50%. Very interestingly, only 36% of Independents think he's guilty.

The rest of your post wasn't worth a response.
That's some good spin, Dutch.
Spinning that people who say they don't know now equals "not beyond a reasonable doubt" in a trial that hasn't happened yet.

Nicely done.
 
Toronto Escorts