Go drink your Metamucil and its past your bedtime.Hallucinations
Go drink your Metamucil and its past your bedtime.Hallucinations
There sis no Genocide anyone that believes the bullshit frank is pulling needs to have their head examined. Amazing Frank is ok with Iraq passing a pedophilia law. But I think Mohamed's wife was 7 years old.Your supremacists are the ones blowing up civilians.
46% of Canada thinks Israel is committing genocide.There sis no Genocide anyone that believes the bullshit frank is pulling needs to have their head examined. Amazing Frank is ok with Iraq passing a pedophilia law. But I think Mohamed's wife was 7 years old.
Cult fictionBlowing up Islamic terrorists is fine. Especially when the terrorists kill their own civilians.
RacismThere sis no Genocide anyone that believes the bullshit frank is pulling needs to have their head examined. Amazing Frank is ok with Iraq passing a pedophilia law. But I think Mohamed's wife was 7 years old.
You posted an article that says when you use explosive weapons in densely populated areas the civilian casualty rates become unacceptable.Red Cross reports up to 90%. Check and mate, terrorist lover
Data on civilian collateral damage in densely populated urban conflicts is limited and often varies depending on the conflict and reporting agency, but there are general findings from recent urban warfare studies and reports:
1. Civilian Casualty Ratios: In many modern urban conflicts, civilians make up a significant proportion of casualties. For instance, a report by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) indicated that civilians can account for up to 90% of casualties in heavily populated conflict zones. This is especially true in densely populated areas where distinguishing combatants from civilians is challenging.
2. Urban Conflict Studies: A 2017 study by Airwars found that in cities like Raqqa and Mosul during the fight against ISIS, civilian casualties reached high numbers—thousands of civilians were killed, and the majority of the city was damaged or destroyed. In densely populated areas, this destruction often affects civilian infrastructure (homes, hospitals, schools), contributing to high collateral damage rates.
3. Collateral Damage Rates in Airstrikes: Collateral damage varies with the type of warfare. Precision-guided munitions aim to reduce collateral damage but still cause significant casualties in dense urban areas. For example, data from conflicts like those in Gaza and Syria showed that even with advanced targeting, airstrikes frequently result in unintended civilian deaths and injuries.
4. Challenges in Reporting Accurate Data: Reporting on civilian casualties in urban areas is notoriously challenging due to limited access, unreliable data collection, and, at times, intentional misinformation. Independent monitoring groups like Airwars and UN agencies work to provide estimates, but exact numbers are often debated.
5. General Estimate Range: Though the rate of collateral damage varies by conflict, analysts often cite that, in modern urban warfare, civilian casualties may represent 50-90% of all casualties in densely populated areas, particularly when heavy weapons are used.
6. Infrastructure Impact: The destruction of essential civilian infrastructure (water, power, medical facilities) indirectly increases civilian harm by contributing to secondary effects such as disease and lack of medical care.
While there is no universally applicable percentage, these studies and reports suggest that in heavily populated urban warfare scenarios, the impact on civilians tends to be extremely high, both in direct casualties and in indirect harm due to damaged infrastructure.
Hamas is beating the shit out of their wife, Gaza.Wife beater's defence, Shazi.
Both wrong.If you're killing 70% women and children you are either the shittiest army in the world or you're trying to kill women and children.
The only urban conflict "of a similar nature" is say Guernica, Leningrad, Panama City and pretty much any city in Vietnam being flattened by B52's. Urban conflict suggests that the other has some way to fight back. Not a civilian population being bombed from air strikes.Produce better numbers from another urban conflict of similar nature. I’ll wait
guess who's mutliating kids? not the republicans...In the Muslim world women are pretty much possessions of men.
The republican wants the same.
I wrote often that all religions are invention of men to oppress woman.
As Hank Williams Junior said. "it's a family traditon"
I hope you realize that it's only a problem for franky if Israel is involved....if it's Syria & ISIS, Iraq, Iran or Afghanistan, he doesn't care.Red Cross reports up to 90%. Check and mate, terrorist lover
Data on civilian collateral damage in densely populated urban conflicts is limited and often varies depending on the conflict and reporting agency, but there are general findings from recent urban warfare studies and reports:
1. Civilian Casualty Ratios: In many modern urban conflicts, civilians make up a significant proportion of casualties. For instance, a report by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) indicated that civilians can account for up to 90% of casualties in heavily populated conflict zones. This is especially true in densely populated areas where distinguishing combatants from civilians is challenging.
2. Urban Conflict Studies: A 2017 study by Airwars found that in cities like Raqqa and Mosul during the fight against ISIS, civilian casualties reached high numbers—thousands of civilians were killed, and the majority of the city was damaged or destroyed. In densely populated areas, this destruction often affects civilian infrastructure (homes, hospitals, schools), contributing to high collateral damage rates.
3. Collateral Damage Rates in Airstrikes: Collateral damage varies with the type of warfare. Precision-guided munitions aim to reduce collateral damage but still cause significant casualties in dense urban areas. For example, data from conflicts like those in Gaza and Syria showed that even with advanced targeting, airstrikes frequently result in unintended civilian deaths and injuries.
4. Challenges in Reporting Accurate Data: Reporting on civilian casualties in urban areas is notoriously challenging due to limited access, unreliable data collection, and, at times, intentional misinformation. Independent monitoring groups like Airwars and UN agencies work to provide estimates, but exact numbers are often debated.
5. General Estimate Range: Though the rate of collateral damage varies by conflict, analysts often cite that, in modern urban warfare, civilian casualties may represent 50-90% of all casualties in densely populated areas, particularly when heavy weapons are used.
6. Infrastructure Impact: The destruction of essential civilian infrastructure (water, power, medical facilities) indirectly increases civilian harm by contributing to secondary effects such as disease and lack of medical care.
While there is no universally applicable percentage, these studies and reports suggest that in heavily populated urban warfare scenarios, the impact on civilians tends to be extremely high, both in direct casualties and in indirect harm due to damaged infrastructure.
By your argument, Jews haven't moved on with their lives.Because your freedom loving friends are the only ones on the planet stupid enough to be refugees for 70 years.
Dozens of countries lost territory during last century. All of them moved on with their life.
Then blowing up Jewish terrorists is fine when they kill those same civilians, right?Blowing up Islamic terrorists is fine. Especially when the terrorists kill their own civilians.
Hamas is pretty keen on it, trying to do everything they can to set it up. Attack a country knowing they would respond resulting in operations that no matter how hard they try [and the IDF is going above and beyond which I've shown you with mainstream media reporting] would result in civilian dead. Tell their own people to ignore Israel warnings of attack, go from civilian to military uniforms, hiding behind critical infruscture, plus the whole begging to be attacked in a built up area by going on a frenzy of rape murder and hostage taking.But blowing people up is ok if they are Muslim for you?
Wife beater defenseHamas is pretty keen on it, trying to do everything they can to set it up. Attack a country knowing they would respond resulting in operations that no matter how hard they try [and the IDF is going above and beyond which I've shown you with mainstream media reporting] would result in civilian dead. Tell their own people to ignore Israel warnings of attack, go from civilian to military uniforms, hiding behind critical infruscture, plus the whole begging to be attacked in a built up area by going on a frenzy of rape murder and hostage taking.
You have a lot of fucking balls talking like that you genocidal hate monger.
Jews have had a reasonably civilized life for the last 70 years.By your argument, Jews haven't moved on with their lives.
They're stealing land that they claim was theirs thousands of years ago, and your making a stink about people
who got booted out 70 years ago.
Different rules for Jews, is that what your saying?
Is that why wiki listed Israel as the cause of the genocide, Shazi?Hamas is beating the shit out of their wife, Gaza.
That's such an idiotic argument, Shazi.Both wrong.
Hamas specifically hides behind women and children.