"Iran cannot have nukes" Trump warns

kherg007

Well-known member
May 3, 2014
9,236
7,425
113
It think it's funny that people think Trump is a war monger and potential threat when Obama holds the distinction of being America's most wartime president. Isn't that ironic?

That asshole general was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of American service members and his regime is a terrorist organization. Still doesn't mean Trump started a war. He did the right thing.



Btw your question asking me if I was referring to Obama or Biden is a trick question. You don't think Biden was actually running things for the past 4 years do you?
First, it was an act of war whether you think so or not. Iran drone strikes the head of the joint chiefs of the usa, would usa not consider it an act of war?
Second - Obama more wartime president? More than ...Bush I? Bush II? Nixon? LBJ? JFK? Truman? FDR? Hmm...

In fact, since you're interested in facts, hostile Action deaths for US presidents:

Biden (4 years): 16
Trump (4 years): 65
Obama (8 years): 1,517
GW Bush (8 years): 3,783
Clinton (8 years): 1
GHW Bush (4 years): 170
Reagan (8 years): 58 (+ 263 marines blown up in Lebanon)
Carter had like 18.
Nixon had 47,000.
LBJ had like 30,000.

Obama inherited 2 wars. He shut one down fully. He didnt start any.

You could look it up. I did. Don't rely on pundits or tweets! You can check yourself, maybe my maths is off a bit.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
52,085
10,393
113
Toronto
I am talking about what they were granted in the UN plan in 1947, they started the genocide before the ink was properly dry on the paper.

You stick to your parameters and I'll stick to mine. Your 3rd map proves my point. Nothing changed between 1948 and 1967
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,993
1,712
113
You stick to your parameters and I'll stick to mine. Your 3rd map proves my point. Nothing changed between 1948 and 1967
Funny how you deliberately exclude the Nakhba year. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakba "Oh after the genoide everything was JUST FINE. " That is like Germany saying other then 1940 to 1945, Jews were just fine in Germany. No problems at all!!! Whats a few years. 🤣😂👌🤷‍♂️
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
52,085
10,393
113
Toronto
You would argue that Ukraine should stop whining and just accept Putin ruling Ukraine.
You would argue that Ukrainians should just accept another Holodomor.
No. I said this:

shack said:
But they did, didn't they. Instead of trying to make the best of a situation they didn't like by taking what was offered to them, they made it worse by by saying no and stomping their foot like a petulant child and now they've been refugees for 80 years.

Well boo hoo hoo to them. Decisions have consequences.

We've debated this before with the same conclusion. Israel has a homeland the Arabs/Palis do not.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
52,085
10,393
113
Toronto
Funny how you deliberately exclude the Nakhba year. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakba "Oh after the genoide everything was JUST FINE. " That is like Germany saying other then 1940 to 1945, Jews were just fine in Germany. No problems at all!!! Whats a few years. 🤣😂👌🤷‍♂️
My point is that there was no expansionism from 1948-67 because Israel was not under severe attack.

It's a direct cause and effect situation.

No Arab aggression between 1948-67 resulted in no loss of land. Repeated Arab aggression (cause) starting with the 6 day war in 1967 until current time has resulted in repeated loss of land (effect). Your maps bare out my point.

There's a lesson in there for you.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,993
1,712
113
First, it was an act of war whether you think so or not. Iran drone strikes the head of the joint chiefs of the usa, would usa not consider it an act of war?
Second - Obama more wartime president? More than ...Bush I? Bush II? Nixon? LBJ? JFK? Truman? FDR? Hmm...

In fact, since you're interested in facts, hostile Action deaths for US presidents:

Biden (4 years): 16
Trump (4 years): 65
Obama (8 years): 1,517
GW Bush (8 years): 3,783
Clinton (8 years): 1
GHW Bush (4 years): 170
Reagan (8 years): 58 (+ 263 marines blown up in Lebanon)
Carter had like 18.
Nixon had 47,000.
LBJ had like 30,000.

Obama inherited 2 wars. He shut one down fully. He didnt start any.

You could look it up. I did. Don't rely on pundits or tweets! You can check yourself, maybe my maths is off a bit.

You are not counting all the US advisors that have died in Ukraine secretly, but then again its hard to get a reliable figure on those.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
6,093
3,564
113
You stick to your parameters and I'll stick to mine. Your 3rd map proves my point. Nothing changed between 1948 and 1967
False. That is not what you said. Here is a direct quote from you.

The 1948-1967 borders were exactly what Israel was granted by the powers that be at that time. It did not include any land that was intended for any Arab peoples.
‘Here is the message to the American president in 1948 confirming that Israel has announced that its borders are those stipulated in Resolution 181.

IMG_0017.jpeg

Here is a map of those boriders. You will immediately see that it nothing like the map of 1967. What’s appalling is that the letter to the US President was also a lie - Israel had already stolen Palestinian land beyond the borders it promised it had accepted. POS Nation never stops lying. Just like its supporters.

IMG_0018.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,651
60,825
113
I see semantics are your happy place...I guess that's what desperation to peddle a narrative looks like then...

President Obama, who hoped to sow peace, instead led the nation in war
https://www.latimes.com/projects/la-na-pol-obama-at-war/
Nothing in that article contradicts what I said.
You asked specifically about how many wars were started.
I answered with the facts.
It isn't my fault that upsets you.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,990
22,977
113
Not playing your silly games. Why give your accusations any legitimacy?
You are confirming my claims by your refusal to say that Palestinians have rights and the State of Palestine has the same right to exist as Israel.
Clearly you do not believe Palestinians and Palestine have rights.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,990
22,977
113
No. I said this:

shack said:
But they did, didn't they. Instead of trying to make the best of a situation they didn't like by taking what was offered to them, they made it worse by by saying no and stomping their foot like a petulant child and now they've been refugees for 80 years.

Well boo hoo hoo to them. Decisions have consequences.

We've debated this before with the same conclusion. Israel has a homeland the Arabs/Palis do not.
So you think Ukrainians shouldn't stomp their feet and resist either?
Or is this once again you arguing that you don't think Palestinians have any human rights since they are not the 'chosen people'?

What's interesting is that your position sounds way worse than that of Sinwar.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,990
22,977
113
My point is that there was no expansionism from 1948-67 because Israel was not under severe attack.

It's a direct cause and effect situation.

No Arab aggression between 1948-67 resulted in no loss of land. Repeated Arab aggression (cause) starting with the 6 day war in 1967 until current time has resulted in repeated loss of land (effect). Your maps bare out my point.

There's a lesson in there for you.
Your argument is that after the Nabka there was no resistance until 1967 so Palestinians should have been happy living under occupation?

 
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,990
22,977
113
Is that what I said? Prove it.
That's what it looks like you're arguing, if that's not your intent then clear it up.
To me it looks like you think that zionists enacting the Nabka and ethnically cleansing 750,000 Palestinians from their homes led to what you think is 'peace' for 2 decades.

Are you defending the Nabka?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,570
5,017
113
That's what it looks like you're arguing, if that's not your intent then clear it up.
To me it looks like you think that zionists enacting the Nabka and ethnically cleansing 750,000 Palestinians from their homes led to what you think is 'peace' for 2 decades.

Are you defending the Nabka?
Trump is proposing (agreeing with Israel about) a second Nabka, removing the rest of the Palestinians from the Gaza strip, so it can be developed into beachfront luxury resorts.
 

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
6,093
3,564
113
You are confirming my claims by your refusal to say that Palestinians have rights and the State of Palestine has the same right to exist as Israel.
Clearly you do not believe Palestinians and Palestine have rights.
Human rights and equality are anathema to Ziontologists. They will do absolutely anything to avoid it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts