No. I debunked that lame and fallacious analogy. Go back and read it.Oh, the wife beater's defence again.
It's called the fact and logic to prove reality defense.
No. I debunked that lame and fallacious analogy. Go back and read it.Oh, the wife beater's defence again.
frank is losing every debate that is coming from all sides. His hate and immorality is exposed for all to see.Lol.
Completely ignores that the UN has said Israel has the right to exist. And ignores that it was the UN that divided the land.
No, old guy.Franks hypocrisy is really starting to shine.
He loves the UN when the UN says Israel is committing crimes. But won’t accept the UNs resolution and land division. Calls it stupid.
Sure and you also proved you love children and Palestinians too.No. I debunked that lame and fallacious analogy. Go back and read it.
It's called the fact and logic to prove reality defense.
Thanks for recognizing that.Sure and you also proved you love children and Palestinians too.
Wrong. Probably 95% of western society, citizens of 1st world democratic countries and non-muslims blame Hamas.You know everyone blames Israel, not Hamas.
People protesting in public for Israel would probably be met with violence.Everyone is protesting Israel.
You're right. Your reply is extremely stupid because what you wrote is not at all what my theory is. I said nothing even similar to that.So by your theory, everyone, including Netanyahu, knew what was coming so they are to blame for Hamas' attack, just as they will be to blame for the eventual end of apartheid.
Its a stupid, stupid, argument.
You're nuts.Right, now Hamas are everywhere.
...
No, just the ideologically naïve and the hate motivated....
You know everyone blames Israel, not Hamas.
...
If people were specifically protesting against Hamas, Franky and his ilk would claim that makes them racist (while they call for Jews to be removed from the region)....
People protesting in public for Israel would probably be met with violence.
...
Why do you think that is, shack?People protesting in public for Israel would probably be met with violence.
There were 300,000 anti zionists protesting in London the other day.If anti-Zionism is not antisemitism then why do the anti-zionists keep attacking synogogues, Jewish stores and Jews who have nothing to do with Israel or Zionism.
Most of the terrorism is by settlers.You're nuts.
Hamas is in Gaza and the West Bank.
PIJ is in Gaza and the West Bank.
PFLP are active in the West Bank.
All three are active (along with Fatah militants) in the camps in Lebanon where there has been viscous fighting for months.
Hezbollah is active in Lebanon even though their being armed is a violation of UNSC motions (you keep claiming that you support the UN).
The IRGC Quds force is active in Lebanon and Syria.
All of them, are terror groups (no matter how much you support their actions).
Currently listed entities
Introduction to the terms of reference and listing of terrorist entities according to Canada's Anti-Terrorism Actwww.publicsafety.gc.ca
Sure, Israel is attacking Hamas but killing 80% civilians.If people were specifically protesting against Hamas, Franky and his ilk would claim that makes them racist (while they call for Jews to be removed from the region).
Wow. How many falsehoods can you declare in one post?Why do you think that is, shack?
Does nobody like you anymore?
I thought you said 95% of the west backs your genocide?
You know who is really pissed at you?
Canadian Jews.
‘Not in my name’: The European Jews condemning Israel’s war on Gaza
From Glasgow to London to Barcelona, many Jewish protesters take on abuse to join pro-Palestinian rallies.
You just said you can't protest for Israel in public anymore.Wow. How many falsehoods can you declare in one post?
I never said anything close to that.You just said you can't protest for Israel in public anymore.
Frank, it’s a very rare day, you come out on top. That alone should tell you a lot..No, old guy.
I think it was stupid but can accept that it was done and if Israel stayed within those borders there would be no war or occupation.
It can be stupid but still supported.
Yes you did.I never said anything close to that.
You make a good argument.People protesting in public for Israel would probably be met with violence.
Gruesome videos? You think Israel can win that war too?Frank, it’s a very rare day, you come out on top. That alone should tell you a lot..
If you want to stick to just the conflict between Israel and Arab states, you initially brought up Oslo, until close examination of that..the brought Hamas wanting 1967 borders. Somehow forgetting what happened in 1967 and why. And the consequences. You actually tend to live your life that way too. You seem to think there are no consequences in life. Be that as it. Your last fall back was 1949….Then there too,..
I wonder if you recall your exact words in the hours immediately following the hospital…Today, things look very different…
And today, with Israel showing gruesome videos to the world. Once again, you’ve backed the wrong pony. Are any of us surprised? I’m not, you don’t even know who hydro one is. Or that there are wind farms on farms…. That’s how “politically aware” you are.
"People protesting in public for Israel would probably be met with violence" is not " You just said you can't protest for Israel in public anymore".Yes you did.
It means that supporters of Israel are fearful that people who support Hamas will resort to violence, the same way Hamas resorts to violence. And you just try to justify the violence of Hamas protester the way you justify the Oct. 7 attack and in that way justify the death and suffering of Gazan civilians.Protesting for Israel is as popular as protesting for ISIS or Al Qaeda. Or as popular as protesting neo Nazis.