"I Am a Palestinian in Gaza and Hamas must Cede Control"

[shack]

How many times do I have to link to the report that clearly shows Israeli government officials declared genocidal intent and then acted on them before you read it?
Last time I posted it you replied with ROTFL.
That isclear evidence that you are a Holocaust denier who refuses to check the evidence.

How does not reading a report on the statements of Israeli government officials, make him a Holocaust denier? I'd love to hear this logic.

No wonder more and more people are calling for you to be gone.

 

[shack]

Three linked posts provided here.
CBC twice and CNN once, all MSM reports.
As you say, you cannot attack the source so you will use willful ignorance because you are afraid of the truth.

If you are the source, then it's not worth reading.

You created this by crying wolf so often and doctoring articles, people ignore you.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

It says Israeli actions amount to genocide

Yes, the document says that.
I did not.
You are just lying and trying to put words in people's mouth.
Just stop.

 

[shack]

Please post the UNGA statements that show they think there is no Israeli genocide on Palestinians occurring.
Prove that you aren't just screwed in the head and making shit up to make you feel ok about your support of what you know is genocide.

I said "their silence speaks volumes". They were not silent when S. Africa was practising apartheid and they issued resolution #1761. They have released no such resolution in regards to Israel.

There is your proof. And the fact that you keep telling us "It's coming, it's coming" is further proof you know that a UNGA resolution is required to substantiate your claim of genocide.

 

[shack]

Fiction. It was a Jerusalem Post article.

I took it from the MSN feed. They are responsible and obviously vetted the article.

 

[shack]

1: Be fair now, sometimes his posts are not doctored or blatant lies or from extemist sites, sometimes he just lies about what the links actually says. Calling an opinion legally binding, claiming a letter to the editor is a statement from lancet. Be fair now, they are not ALL of those three catagoies. Hate mongers have other methods than that.

2: You would think he can't attack a Reuters or MSN article... I can assure he, he can. He goes full Trumptard calling it fake news.

Sorry for underselling his capabilities.

 

[shack]

I keep posting the law, international rights reports and evidence, buddy.
Your opinion is willfully ignorant.

And I keep posting that the UNGA has not passed any resolutions declaring that Israel is committing genocide or practising apartheid. Those are facts, not opinions.

 

[NotADcotor]

"It's coming, it's coming" i

Great, now he thinks he is the Jesus.

 

[NotADcotor]

If you are the source, then it's not worth reading.

You created this by crying wolf so often and doctoring articles, people ignore you.

You know I would never doctor an article. It's literally in my name... and if I tried, the typos would give it away... it's literally in my name

 

[Klatuu]

I took it from the MSN feed. They are responsible and obviously vetted the article.

You could take it from the moon and it would still be a Jerusalem Post article. MSN identified it as a J Post article. You didn’t. J Post is the source. MSN was honest about it. Not you. You should have been honest about the actual and very questionable source.

 

[Frankfooter]

How does not reading a report on the statements of Israeli government officials, make him a Holocaust denier? I'd love to hear this logic.

No wonder more and more people are calling for you to be gone.

Willful ignorance, Shazi.
Same with you, how much time do you spend pretending every report and news article is fake and that the UN or Amnesty are lying?
Its like Germans who declared they had no idea the holocaust was happening except in your case its clear you work really hard to maintain your willful ignorance.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857631202448220575

 

[Frankfooter]

If you are the source, then it's not worth reading.

You created this by crying wolf so often and doctoring articles, people ignore you.

See, willful ignorance on display.
Clearly the sources are the CBC, CNN and UN, not me.

But you need to maintain your willful ignorance so you will whine like fuck that you shouldn't ever have to see reality, instead you will try to get me banned so you can pretend you aren't here promoting genocide every day.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857092339862261877

 

[Frankfooter]

Yes, the document says that.
I did not.
You are just lying and trying to put words in people's mouth.
Just stop.

I quoted your own post.

Are you now claiming the UN report on genocide is wrong?
If so, prove its wrong, use quotes and evidence to prove that you both read it and can disprove it.

Otherwise we are back to understanding that you post from willful ignorance.

 

[Frankfooter]

I said "their silence speaks volumes". They were not silent when S. Africa was practising apartheid and they issued resolution #1761. They have released no such resolution in regards to Israel.

There is your proof. And the fact that you keep telling us "It's coming, it's coming" is further proof you know that a UNGA resolution is required to substantiate your claim of genocide.

This is not silence from the UN

 

[Frankfooter]

And I keep posting that the UNGA has not passed any resolutions declaring that Israel is committing genocide or practising apartheid. Those are facts, not opinions.

The UNGA passed a resolution demanding Israel end the illegal occupation of Palestine within a year and pay restitution.
Those are facts, not opinions.

By your terms you accept that as the truth and the law to which Israel most obey.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1836452971111948380

 

[Klatuu]

You know I would never doctor an article. It's literally in my name... and if I tried, the typos would give it away... it's literally in my name

A pencil in need of a sharpener

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

I quoted your own post.

Are you now claiming the UN report on genocide is wrong?
If so, prove its wrong, use quotes and evidence to prove that you both read it and can disprove it.

Otherwise we are back to understanding that you post from willful ignorance.

You quoted my post and intentionally misrepresented it to put words in my mouth.
The UN report you linked, does not prove genocide.
It alleges genocide but the ICJ has not ruled on it.
The UN report you linked also does not prove "intent".
Comments from various politicians most likely will not qualify as intent by the state of Israel at the ICJ.

 

[mellowjello]

You quoted my post and intentionally misrepresented it to put words in my mouth.
The UN report you linked, does not prove genocide.
It alleges genocide but the ICJ has not ruled on it.
The UN report you linked also does not prove "intent".
Comments from various politicians most likely will not qualify as intent by the state of Israel at the ICJ.

Which politicians?

 

[Frankfooter]

You quoted my post and intentionally misrepresented it to put words in my mouth.
The UN report you linked, does not prove genocide.
It alleges genocide but the ICJ has not ruled on it.
The UN report you linked also does not prove "intent".
Comments from various politicians most likely will not qualify as intent by the state of Israel at the ICJ.

I've been very clear and accurate with my quotes, you're just squirming and trying to tread a line between admitting willful ignorance and admitting that Israel is committing genocide.

Now your line is that claim you read the report, won't say why but claim it might be wrong and claim that just because there is a shit ton of evidence and charges of genocide at the ICC and ICJ that you really are still unsure of what is going on.

If you want to argue that the UN report is wrong and you are defending genocide then prove its wrong.
If you want to claim willful ignorance of the issue then stop admit it and state that you post only from willful ignorance.

Be clear.

 

[jsanchez]

A few weeks ago Frankfooter called me a Jew because I disagreed with him that pregnant women are not fair targets for Hamas. That should give you an idea of who you're dealing with.

That was just one example of his many Freudian slips but we do have a very good idea of who we're dealing with given his previous handles
and posting history. There was another thread where his inner racist redneck came to the fore when he called Anaida Poilievre a mail-order bride.