The FOX broadcast covered it up. The broadcast going outside of the US clearly shows he was booed, which is what many in attendance have reported.He wasn't booed...lol...did you even watch?
Cheerios
The FOX broadcast covered it up. The broadcast going outside of the US clearly shows he was booed, which is what many in attendance have reported.He wasn't booed...lol...did you even watch?
Money is the only metric for right wingers.The only thing the US as to fix is inequalities. Other then that the US is the richest country on earth.
All other problems are pure inventions from the maga`s...
Anyhow your post is only good for the recycle bin as you do not consider Obama to be a role model as a father. WTF dude!
Trump is already responsible for 1/4 of the debt from the last time.the debt the us govt has accumulated over 240 years is going to double inside of the next 9 years
something has to give and its not going to be good for anyone
The lefties have the most to lose
Lol...eThe FOX broadcast covered it up. The broadcast going outside of the US clearly shows he was booed, which is what many in attendance have reported.
Cheerios
Lol there was one famous person that got booed...it wasn't Trump...heck even mahones kelce and the players were happy to see Trump....nice try spinning it...The FOX broadcast covered it up. The broadcast going outside of the US clearly shows he was booed, which is what many in attendance have reported.
Cheerios
You got one thing right. I did not say those leaders were perfect. I said they inspired people to achieve and grow with a positive vision for a better future. Thanks to Reagan, Bush and Trump, that future is looking bleak and young people see the cut throat meanness and the inequality and more importantly, they see the open flaunting of uncivilized moral behaviour, especially by Trump.He could also make a god awful mess
Saw this doing the rounds yesterday on X. Amazing how lefties believe that Cuba is some sort of paradise yet people die trying to flee it. Where's the poverty rate metric here - somewhere between 80 and 90 percent of that population lives in poverty.Money is the only metric for right wingers.
![]()
sure this is a concern, these things do go in cyclesYou got one thing right. I did not say those leaders were perfect. I said they inspired people to achieve and grow with a positive vision for a better future. Thanks to Reagan, Bush and Trump, that future is looking bleak and young people see the cut throat meanness and the inequality and more importantly, they see the open flaunting of civilized moral behaviour, especially by Trump.
not on borrowed moneySo in light of that, you must obviously object to any proposed charity/aid/tax breaks to the wealthy.
So you're saying that in Cuba, the average person is able to "keep up with the Joneses. I'm sure it's less than that in the US.Saw this doing the rounds yesterday on X. Amazing how lefties believe that Cuba is some sort of paradise yet people die trying to flee it. Where's the poverty rate metric here - somewhere between 80 and 90 percent of that population lives in poverty.
Apologies for not stating it more clearly. I was inferring that tax breaks for the rich are akin to charity and foreign aid in terms of the US debt. It takes away money the gov't could have used.not on borrowed money
the govt has no right to borrow money in other people names to give it away
the tax breaks to the wealthy is more debatable , however if they put their wealth to work it grows the economy
Right now nobody will put their money into Canada to work without a huge government hand out attached because of the Trudeau liberals
That`s exactly what we are trying to make people like you realize with metrics like this. Amazingly, the richest country on earth is so poor that a majority of its population cannot outlive one of the poorest country on earth.Saw this doing the rounds yesterday on X. Amazing how lefties believe that Cuba is some sort of paradise yet people die trying to flee it. Where's the poverty rate metric here - somewhere between 80 and 90 percent of that population lives in poverty.
here in lies the problemApologies for not stating it more clearly. I was inferring that tax breaks for the rich are akin to charity and foreign aid in terms of the US debt. It takes away money the gov't could have used.
absolutely nottax breaks for the rich are akin to charity and foreign aid in terms of the US debt.
I said it in my last post and I guess I need to repeat myself.here in lies the problem
"It takes away money the gov't could have used."
the money was not the governments to begin with
the govt has no right to borrow money in other people names to give it away
absolutely not
charity and foreign aid $ do not get invested into job creating investments
sending $ overseas to advance DEI and gender ideology is not foreign aid and is not supported by anywhere near a majority of tax payers
re charity: a healthy well managed growing economy can support way more charitable initiatives than an overtaxed , underproductive debt burdened economy
we are heading down the slippery slope of a government debt crisis that will devastate the very people you want to help in addition to everyone else
its odd to repeat what you know is wrongI said it in my last post and I guess I need to repeat myself.
Its still worthy of discussion.Saw this doing the rounds yesterday on X. Amazing how lefties believe that Cuba is some sort of paradise yet people die trying to flee it. Where's the poverty rate metric here - somewhere between 80 and 90 percent of that population lives in poverty.
There are none so blind as those who refuse to see. Giving a tax break to the wealthy is not giving away borrowed money. Or is this a cognitive issue you have.its odd to repeat what you know is wrong
I am simply saying that by giving away money , that it borrowed in other people name, the government is irresponsible depriving itself of the ability to stay solvent.






