Ah, but you ignored my next paragraph:
Yes, I ignored the nonsense part. It was intentional. I wanted to give credit where credit was due.
Definitely not full of himself and Clinton has to keep tracking left because Bernie came as close to winning as you can without winning.
I know racism when I see it. So does everyone else here, except you and a few other loons. Even the GOP is closing ranks against Trump on his racist comment: Ryan, Gingrich, many many other have condemned it.
It's unclear that she has to. She might get a lot of mileage out of Sanders voters, but a lot of them might vote for her ANYWAY when the other choice is Trump.
You don't even know what it is, never mind how to identify it.
Do you really feel that your shattered windshield views on the world are shared by "nearly everyone else here"? Delusion number 2. Possibly the most bizarre of your delusions.
Who are you kidding, yourself? Are you counting on anyone believing that Trump and the GOP establishment are on the same page/same team? Trump (like Sanders) ran in order to take over control of the GOP and change the way the party operates. And yet you feign "surprise" that the GOP themselves are among Trump's detractors?
No, I think it isn't racist to believe that a judge from a tight knit minority community, and who has actively advocated on behalf of that community, might strongly dislike a presidential candidate whose platform includes items strongly opposed by that minority community, and might allow that sentiment to affect his objectivity. As I've said three times already, I don't know whether the court rulings are reasonable or not, but if the rulings are extraordinary, drawing the link is a rational theory, not racism. People are smarter than you give them credit for. They understand that you need to distort what other people say to advance your indefensible positions. The weird thing about you Fuji, not to suggest that you are totally alone, is that you could have criticized Trump's statements as simply wrong, or bad judgment, and your position would at least be tenable, but you have to square peg it into racism, where your position falls apart. That is your Achilles Heel. When you have a semi-lucid point, you consistently try to stretch it into something it could never be.
This election is the Libertarians to win or loose. Donald Trump is not a typical Republican, much of the party distrusts him, and he keeps shooting himself in the foot. Meanwhile, anyone who has not drunk the kool-aid, and for whom the statement "My word is my bond" actually means something would never vote for Hilary Clinton. On the Other hand Governor Johnson and Governor Weld are pretty much mainstream Republicans. If they can breakthrough the stereotype of Libertarians this may well be their year to come up through the middle.
What the heck is a fiscal Republican? Do you mean moderate Republican or RINO? I have yet to hear any noteworthy Republican openly state they will be voting for Hillary. Republicans can't stand the wench.
Clinton doesn't want to lose the Sanders voters so she has to tow a fine line on how right she swings. She is on the record as stating she supports the continuation of the Obama legacy. That hardly appeals to moderate Republicans.
You goofed by defending this racist screed by Trump and multiple people here have called you on it. The outrageous racism of calling a sitting judge unfit because of his ancestry didn't seem to register with you. You are just too far gone.
Trumps choice of words were poor but the essence of what he said is correct. All he was saying is that he believes the judge is biased because he advocates for pro-Mexican groups. He believes the judge is sympathetic to pro-Mexican causes because he of his Mexican heritage. This would not be a surprise. Given this, it is not a stretch to think the judge will be unbiased toward Trump who is considered the enemy in the pro-Mexican groups the judge advocates for. The logic is simple, try following it.
^^^^^^ more text book racism. Like Bud your thinking is so thoroughly racist you don't even comprehend what's racist about calling someone unfit because of their ancestry. You are instead trying to justify it by resort to a blatantly racist argument.
CNN today. The judge's rulings have generally been favourable to Chump throughout the case - which is why your boy hasn't lashed out verbally at the judge before now. All commentators stated that Chump has no grounds legally or factually to allege bias.
The GOP establishment has looked at Trump with disgust the moment he entered the race.
Trump thinks he's biased because he's Mexican.
