Full Mueller Report
- Thread starter Phil C. McNasty
- Start date
O
OnTheWayOut
OMG, that is so shocking! Who would have guessed that the nutbar libs would do this? Only thing more shocking is that they used the word "may" instead of "surely".
There was no collusion and no obstruction.
There was no attempt at obstruction.
Whether or not the reasons for wanting to fire Mueller were paramount or not, his firing would not have killed the investigation, just like Comey's firing did not end the FBI.
Schiff is the one who colluded with Russians.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7mzoZvSbAM
There was no attempt at obstruction.
Whether or not the reasons for wanting to fire Mueller were paramount or not, his firing would not have killed the investigation, just like Comey's firing did not end the FBI.
Schiff is the one who colluded with Russians.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7mzoZvSbAM
Look at these two hyenas ^^ attacking a new member simply because he/she doesn't share the same ideologies. Same thing in the lounge as well. Freaking bullies and trolls!!
They never say a word to their alt-left buddies like Frank footer aka flubadub aka groggy aka gryfin; or Charlemagne aka twizz aka yung_dood; or Knuckle Balls aka LT56 aka Conway_Stewart.
ALL BANNED MULTIPLE TIMES.
In fact Conway_Stewart's home board for 10 years is commonly referred to as "the cesspool" where he routinely calls escorts "cunts" and "bitches" and counsels people to commit suicide. The same board whose owner has apparently hacked TERB members' email accts multiple times.
Yet these two fools quoted above choose to badger a newbie with 20 posts. No wonder why participation here is tanking!
Spaceballs, when the ultra-left are trolling you (same as they did to War Games) you're hitting a nerve and enraging them. Welcome! (ps: I too remember the epic "greekster" thread, it was priceless lol).
He is no new member, and was the one to attack us in his first few posts, under this handle. Obviously you caught the bull by the tail. Nothing to do with being bullies. But all you are good at is name calling and abusive lingo....... absolutely nothing else. When are you going to bring any substance to your debates on this forum?? For once do so in a civil manner, otherwise it is only a matter of time that you will find yourself banned, like the others have been for their constant abuses!!
YOU preaching about civility and abusive lingo?
Look, you are either hopelessly obtuse or you're being willfully ignorant.
I used to really enjoy this forum but EVERY time I look with the little free time I have, there's you and a couple of others hurling nasty hideous insults at good members here. (As happened to me in the past on many occasions as well. I'll repost them if you like.)
"racists" "islamaphobes" "incels" "bigots" "misogynists" "white supremacists" etc. Or constantly implying such. Just because some folks here have different political ideologies than you. You WAY cross the line, it's disgusting.
Spirited healthy debate is great! But your aggressive cyber bully/smear campaigns are nasty and over the top.
It's driving people off the site which is a shame and shouldn't be tolerated.
I estimate the posts @ 70-80% = left/alt-lefts. So why do you insist on dominating the entire forum? Isn't that enough? Will you and your ilk not be satisfied until every one who disagrees with you is gone?
In any case, if your insults don't tone down I'm going to start reporting you (and friends) to the mods. Then you and frankfooter can eat your own ominous banning threats. Hopefully you both take a good long look in the mirror and grow up.
In the meantime some advice: try to cut back on CNN a bit; and spring is finally here so make a point to get outside for some fresh air, clear your head.
I'm all for political arguments on the merits of tax breaks for the rich over social services, those are excellent and healthy political debates.
But when someone tries to argue that being a racist is just a 'different political ideology', then we have a problem, Houston.
Trump supporters who don't understand that Trump's policies, which clearly favour the plutocracy over worker rights, are only acceptable to his base because of other views of Trump they back invite debate.
Please do.
Similar threads
