Common sense isn`t it? Too bad Trudeau and his band of dumbfucks have none.
France Riots - Their George Floyd Moment
- Thread starter CrispyCrunch
- Start date
ideologues like Justin Trudeau do not apply common sense
he has the UN, the WEF & Gerald Butts to tell him what he is thinking
FYI Canada does need immigration to maintain GDP growth
however
- we need immigrants with skill sets which are in demand
- there was no need for 1 mm , especially when we have a housing shortage
Last edited:
likely between 200,000 & 250,000, however subject to growth in housing and the number of skilled employment positions which need filling
ie use some common sense rather than rigid ideology
you are aware the former liberal immigration minister reduced the value of a job offer in the screen process from 650 points to 50 -essentially eliminating it
meanwhile skilled job positions remain unfilled
rigid ideology instead of common sense
Last edited:
that was the approx. average before Justin Trudeau
everything he touches turns to shit
As i said subject to growth in housing and the number of skilled employment positions which need filling
housing shortages have become much worse since 2015 , (so logically less immigration) , offset by an increase in skilled employment positions which need filling (so logically we need people to fill these positions via some immigration)
these effects likely offset each other within 50 k
>>>> the approx. average before Justin Trudeau
please pay attentionk
no
do not mis-represent me !!!
i explained it clearly enough
what god damn part about a housing shortage did you not understand ?
There's no point in confronting you, it's not like you bring interesting thoughts or engagement to the table.
Watching you implode into repetition and meme-blasting is sometimes kind of amusing, but it isn't really entertaining enough to bother with.
One million immigrants in Canada last year?!.....
Canada welcomes historic number of newcomers in 2022 - Canada.ca
Canada has experienced one of the fastest recoveries from the pandemic, thanks in large part to our approach to immigration. Newcomers enrich our communities, and contribute to our economy by working, creating jobs and supporting local businesses. Recognizing their value, the Government of...
Those native communities have had shitty drinking water for a century. Nothing to do with immigrants.
And tell me about "religious extremism" in recent immigrants to Canada?..... The whole immigration process screens immigrants and attempts to ensure assimilation. Your degree of misinformation is mind boggling. You literally know nothing about the issue.
There is a reason that Martin Luther King didn't condemn riots.
(“I think that we’ve got to see that a riot is the language of the unheard." )
He didn't think it was the most effective tactic (he is very clear on this and he chose the tactics he did for a reason) but he was very aware of the what you are talking about in your first sentence.
too funny
vs what you bring ... ''billionaires should not exist' as you post using technology brought to you by billionaires
and yet here you are
too funny
please feel free to put me on ignore if you do not like what I post
but if you are going to attack me have the balls to confront me directly
you are pathetic
Last edited:
that's a rather cynical view
what you call a 'tactic' others might call common sense or pragmatic
violent protests would have resulted in violent suppression & he did not want more violence to happen to his people,
non- violent protests bewildered and confused his enemies & eventually won over public support
He paid the ultimate price , however he made a positive impact for a lot of people
lets look at this
the first mistake here is thinking only the right is appalled by riots, looting and arson.
There are laws created by society for riots, looting and arson and the vast majority of society values law and order
society has prisons for good reason
the next mistake is expecting violent protestors to be taken seriously.
That is giving into blackmail & a full stop rejection
the next mistake is expecting planned and deliberate violence to drive positive societal change
planned and deliberate violence is anarchy
positive societal change is not compatible with planed and deliberate violence
the next mistake is expecting to win over anyone with planned and deliberate violence
society values law and order & society has an unfavorable view of planned and deliberate violence
society has prisons for good reason
the next mistake is expecting/ proclaiming these types of violent civil unrests will continue to occur.
society values law and order & society gets tired of violent civil unrest quickly
society has prisons for good reason
Last edited:
There were major riots in 2005 over the death of a couple of teenagers from the African diaspora community, not exactly a George Floyd moment...
Yes.
That was his tactic.
His reasoning was both pragmatic and moral, and he spoke about it a great deal.
I don't know why you think that's cynical, but he was very clear on the issue.
he did not really have a choice to pursue violent protests, that would have done more harm than good to his cause, negated his moral advantage & resulted in a lot of innocent black folk dead
violent protests would have been suicidal for his cause
so avoiding that route was not a tactical decision, just pragmatism
I suspect he expended a great deal of time & energy convincing his people violent protests were a no go
Vengeance can be a powerful motivator
Did MLK ever condone riots?
“Violence as a way of achieving racial justice is both impractical and immoral. I am not unmindful of the fact that violence often brings about momentary results. Nations have frequently won their independence in battle. But in spite of temporary victories, violence never brings permanent peace. It solves no social problem: it merely creates new and more complicated ones. Violence is impractical because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all. It is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding: it seeks to annihilate rather than convert. Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love. It destroys community and makes brotherhood impossible. It leaves society in monologue rather than dialogue. Violence ends up defeating itself.”
"Violence never brings peace" - Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
As the day for celebrating Dr. Martin Luther King approaches, we have an opportunity to reflect on the past year with its many challenges – from COVID, to the police brutality that ignited the BLM...
www.fairhousingnorcal.org
It is relevant if war is meant to bring peace. It could indeed
bring peace after total destruction of some of its participants.
Outbreak of war like WWI might seem inevitable but think how
much likely WWII would have been averted had the preceding
world war came to an end sooner.
bring peace after total destruction of some of its participants.
Outbreak of war like WWI might seem inevitable but think how
much likely WWII would have been averted had the preceding
world war came to an end sooner.
World War 2 could also have been avoided if Britain and the USA let Germany conquer France and become tyrant of Europe 30 years before Hitler.
Yes. Exactly as I said.Did MLK ever condone riots?
“Violence as a way of achieving racial justice is both impractical and immoral. I am not unmindful of the fact that violence often brings about momentary results. Nations have frequently won their independence in battle. But in spite of temporary victories, violence never brings permanent peace. It solves no social problem: it merely creates new and more complicated ones. Violence is impractical because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all. It is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding: it seeks to annihilate rather than convert. Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love. It destroys community and makes brotherhood impossible. It leaves society in monologue rather than dialogue. Violence ends up defeating itself.”
."Violence never brings peace" - Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
As the day for celebrating Dr. Martin Luther King approaches, we have an opportunity to reflect on the past year with its many challenges – from COVID, to the police brutality that ignited the BLM...www.fairhousingnorcal.org
He thought violence was a bad tactic and impractical.
He also didn't condemn the people who rioted. (And riots isn't what he is talking about there.)
