You are not understanding my question. I am asking you of the two who WILL BE running the USA, which one is better for the US? It's a simple question. One is better than the other even if neither meets your level of competency, one is still better to run the country for the next 4 years than the other so PLEASE tell me which one you believe is better for the US for the next 4 years. I suspect, I have a hunch who you prefer of the two but I want to see if you have the balls to just come out and admit it.
Former Trump administration official Kellyanne Conway registers as lobbyist for Ukrainian billionaire with past ties to Trump
- Thread starter bver_hunter
- Start date
My answer continues to be neither. Kamala has just clearly stated she does not support Medicare for all, supports fracking. Will tow the line on war mongering. Basically she is a Muppet for the donors. She is a political weather vane. I'm not seeing the qualities she supposedly has. 1 year ago the party wanted to dump her ass as a liability. Someone who couldn’t get anything done. Now suddenly she is qualified to be President? I think not.
Trump is Trump. More chaos. Usual shit. More division.
This latest round of idiocy in the American system just proves once again things need to get worse before it gets better. And both candidates qualify to bring that.
I know you support Harris, but what do you think she will actually accomplish?
What makes you believe those reports?
What makes you believe her threat, if it existed, is valid?
Even if you buy those reports, they show Pelosi (and Obama apparently?) threatening to use the 25th to try and force him to step down.
That means it was a threat to cause the political situation to get worse.
You do know that they wouldn't have been able to remove him with the 25th amendment, right?
We saw how ineffective it is with Trump.
It only really works for a President who has been incapacitated (in a coma, under surgery, and so on).
You're talking to a man who thinks the DNC screwed Bernie and admitted it in court.
"You really do not comprehend how the nomination system works." is a wild understatement.
He isn't avoiding the question.
While I doubt very much he would ever vote a protest vote in an election he actually had a stake in (The way he talks about voting in Canada is always different.), he does seem to believe in the whole "Third Party Protest Votes are Morally Good" delusion. Not in the, "I have thought about it strategically and am making a choice based on strategy" way, but just they are a moral good in and of themselves regardless. Or rather, they reflect his moral goodness, which is probably even sillier.
Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders
The court affirmed that the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Hillary Clinton.
observer.com
Cripes do you gaslight. Here it is.
Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders
The court affirmed that the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Hillary Clinton.
observer.com
Sure I do. The party is a private entity who can lie about the process and do whatever the fuck they want. As they admitted court.
For the time being this is what a Neurologist thinks of Biden:
As for Trump, now around 56% of the Americans think that he is too old to serve in office. So, don't you think that he should also step down?
By the way Republicans held Primaries with just Trump on the ballot. So what's your problem with only the Democrats cancelling State Primaries that also occurred when Bill Clinton and Obama ran for re-election??
Kamala is a much better option than Trump.......... Yes or No? For once answer a question!!
[QUOTE="Butler1000, post: 8596344, member: 169379"
Of course it isn't the most important thing in my life, but considering you posting history, Trump is clearly to you. And that is just so pathetic. I enjoy watching partisans like yourself get twisted up in knots. You are clearly so emotional about Trump. He is the bad girlfriend you hate. So much so ypu can't see how toxic the Dems are as well. You think they are above criticism.
No one is.
[/QUOTE]
Your partisan POVs seem to make excuses by constantly pointing the blame at Democrats. So, if the Democrats are "toxic" in your opinion, are you saying that the Republicans have better moral and political values? How about the felon like Trump who was found guilty on 34 counts, as well as sexual assault charges? Is he less toxic than the Democrats? For once just answer a few simple questions!!
Of course it isn't the most important thing in my life, but considering you posting history, Trump is clearly to you. And that is just so pathetic. I enjoy watching partisans like yourself get twisted up in knots. You are clearly so emotional about Trump. He is the bad girlfriend you hate. So much so ypu can't see how toxic the Dems are as well. You think they are above criticism.
No one is.
[/QUOTE]
Your partisan POVs seem to make excuses by constantly pointing the blame at Democrats. So, if the Democrats are "toxic" in your opinion, are you saying that the Republicans have better moral and political values? How about the felon like Trump who was found guilty on 34 counts, as well as sexual assault charges? Is he less toxic than the Democrats? For once just answer a few simple questions!!
What does that have to do with whether or not the reports of the threats of the 25th amendment are true?
Or do you think that was the only way they could convince him?
See....he has STAFF? In other words you just admitted non elected people are making presidential decisions. Thanks.
Yes, we discussed you misunderstanding this lawsuit back in the day.Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders
The court affirmed that the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Hillary Clinton.
Cripes do you gaslight. Here it is.
As usual he deflects from answering the questions, but always poses questions and expects answers that only suit his POV!!
Don't you think that Presidents consult their staff to make certain difficult decisions.
We know that Trump made his own irrational ones, that is why he had a revolving door in the Whitehouse.
But once again you avoid answering a simple question posed to you!!
The public embarrassment? Yes. The reports are they had Kamala on side to call for it. And as Pelosi never went into something without the votes counted I imagine the cabinet votes as well.
Considering the history of the party, which you have conveniently chosen not to acknowledge that I'm right on their primary rigging ways, yes he was forced out. Especially because right up until he suddenly got covid he was saying he was staying in.
These are not good people.
Spot On. This meme must have been created based on Butler's constant posts on this Board!!
Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders
The court affirmed that the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Hillary Clinton.
observer.com
These are not good people.
