Format for reviews

[jeffphil]

There seems to be some reasonable variability in review format for SP's; I have been looking at this issue for some time and came across some very helpful reviews from Homonger; I really like this format and suggest others consider the format as well; I added a Breasts line (real vs. fake), a very helpful piece of information from my POV; you can look at more of Homonger's reviews to get a better idea of the format


SP...............Melissa (HW) OUT; TIMES SEEN: 1; SEE AGAIN? Maybe
WEB................. http://www.hollywood-escort.com/g-melissa-s.swf
MENU............... F/S,DFK, BBBJ,DATY
BOD................. 7.5
BREASTS......... Real
LOOKS............. 7.5
ATTITUDE.........8
SERVICE........... 8.5
PIERCINGS/TATTOOS One tat on her lower back, one on her ankle
MEMORABLE MOMENT She gives really good head too

Description: I had read a bit about Melissa on TERB, but I wasn’t really sure what to expect. She is a cute blonde, a bit fuller in the body than the skinny chicks I usually like, but very soft and cuddly. Melissa turned out to be a great time, and our session consisted of some nice dfk, good bbbj, and some tasty daty. We did in all of the major positions, and I came pounding her good and hard from behind. Her ass is bigger than I like, but it was soft and bouncy and it was all good. She has a pretty face, but I couldn’t quite come up with her celebrity match.

 

[shack]

; you can look at more of Homonger's reviews to get a better idea of the format


SP...............Melissa (HW) OUT; TIMES SEEN: 1; SEE AGAIN? Maybe
WEB................. http://www.hollywood-escort.com/g-melissa-s.swf
MENU............... F/S,DFK, BBBJ,DATY
BOD................. 7.5
BREASTS......... Real
LOOKS............. 7.5
ATTITUDE.........8
SERVICE........... 8.5

I don't ever recall homonger using a format like that.

 

[rosemount36]

I think I understand your desire for consistency in the format and that as many aspects of the encounter and the SP are covered. I do have concerns, though, that members who are uncomfortable with the format would simply forgo posting reviews. Sometimes there is enjoyment in reading all kinds of styles in reviews - what appeals to me - in terms of format reviews - may not appeal to you etc. Good idea, but I fear it could be too limiting...

 

[oldjones]

I think there's more to a good, complete review than the example show. The most obvious, and a difficulty here and in the other forums is identifying the subject, which the example barely does.

To be informative and useful, the review should provide the SP's name (including some detail to distinguish her from others w/ the same nom d'amour, where/how the reviewer discovered her, and where she's located and how she can be contacted. Clearly some discretion's desireable, so she's neither swamped nor outed, but it can be done. Far too many decent reviews grow tails of "Contact info Pls", "Is this her RedZone or other URL?", not to mention add-ons describing totally different providers w/ sharing that name. If you haven't identifed her, the review is just Creative Writing.

 

[luv4lust]

personally the rating thing doesn't work well not everyone has the same tastes

 

[Mia.Colpa]

Ratings are completely unreliable based on my experience over the years. Just prefer the facts to help the reader.

 

[Hangman]

If it ain't broke...

As soon as I get paid for reviews, like a restaurant critic, then I'll adopt a standardized format.

Reviewers here are doing so out of the goodness of their hearts, and a desire to share. Trying to standardize will stifle that interest.

There are other boards with standardized fields, if you prefer that approach.

 

[MuffinMuncher]

Part of the fun is reading the reviewers style - there have been some classics over the years. The standardized template makes sure that all the details get covered, but it may be a deterrent for some posters.