Toronto Escorts

Emma Watson accused of antisemitism over pro-Palestinian Instagram post

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,843
6,341
113
*********************************************************************************************
You're just proving my point, kiddo. On the hasbara list "yell Jewish conspiracy...
So accusing people of parroting Israeli 'propaganda' isn't a conspiracy theory. Nice.

And where the hell did you get the idea that I'm soft on right wing antisemitism?

p.s. do you have any comment on Palestinian racism directed towards Jews which has been a big part of 100 years of violence?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,843
6,341
113
Feel free to quote the reports and find the parts you think I don't agree with.
...
I do and you make excuses.

Being a Jew in the West bank does not make people legitimate targets. You keep alleging they aren't civilians because there is the IDF.
In repeated discussions about Gaza rockets from Hamas, PIJ, and others, you've claimed these terrorist groups have a right of self defense. The groups you quote say the opposite.
I can't quote where you are critical of Palestinian leadership because you are too busy demonizing Israel to do so.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,644
17,845
113
I do and you make excuses.

Being a Jew in the West bank does not make people legitimate targets. You keep alleging they aren't civilians because there is the IDF.
In repeated discussions about Gaza rockets from Hamas, PIJ, and others, you've claimed these terrorist groups have a right of self defense. The groups you quote say the opposite.
I can't quote where you are critical of Palestinian leadership because you are too busy demonizing Israel to do so.
1) You have stated that settlers attacking Palestinians are 'terrorists'. Now you say that those 'terrorists' aren't legitimate targets, but Palestinians you label as 'terrorist', like Defence For Children International (as described by Israel), are legitimate targets.
2) You still claim that Palestinians never have the right to self defence, even under an illegal occupation, but that settlers acting as militants in occupied Palestine have the right to self defense.
3) These threads take too much of my time just correcting your claims to discuss Palestinian politics.

You're describing apartheid, where you refuse to acknowledge even basic human rights for Palestinians, from the right to self determination to the right to self defence under an illegal occupation.
Stop defending apartheid.

The way towards peace is to stop using the word 'terrorist' and apply basic human rights and the rule of law.
Bring in the ICC.
End apartheid.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,843
6,341
113
1) You have stated that settlers attacking Palestinians are 'terrorists'. Now you say that those 'terrorists' aren't legitimate targets,
Yes, that's what your rights groups say.

Settlers who are engaged in attacks on civilians deserve to be arrested or self defense could be applied against them during their attacks.

Every other Jew in the West Bank is NOT a legitimate target despite what you are trying to claim. If people who think like you were in charge of Israel then attacks on every other Palestinian would be considered legitimate.

What makes your double standard even worse is you have complained about Israel arresting people engaged in violence or killing them in the act while happily supporting Palestinians doing much worse.

From Amnesty
1641947529390.png
Pretty much exactly what I said.



but Palestinians you label as 'terrorist', like Defence For Children International (as described by Israel), are legitimate targets.
First I never said DCIP is a terrorist group (unless in your warped world think I run Israel). PFLP is a terrorist group though, as is Hamas, PIJ, and Fatah's armed wing. That's not my opinion, it's Canada's.


2) You still claim that Palestinians never have the right to self defence, even under an illegal occupation, but that settlers acting as militants in occupied Palestine have the right to self defense.
We have different definitions of self defense. Self defense applies when you are being directly attacked and you can't get away, you can defend yourself against that person. It does not mean you can lob rockets randomly towards cities because you don't like Jews being in Jerusalem.


3) These threads take too much of my time just correcting your claims to discuss Palestinian politics.
So now your excuse for refusing to criticize flaws in Palestinian leadership is because you don't have enough time?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,644
17,845
113
Yes, that's what your rights groups say.

Settlers who are engaged in attacks on civilians deserve to be arrested or self defense could be applied against them during their attacks.
Congratulations, this is the first time that you've ever admitted that Palestinians have a right to self defense against settlers in any situation.
Now, for the record, how is one to identify between say a 'random' settler and a 'terrorist' settler?


Thank you for posting that you also agree with Amnesty that every single settlement in the OToP are illegal war crimes.
Amnesty says settlers lose their civilian status when they take part in hostilities.

I assume that these would therefore not be civilians by your definition.
Or for that matter, any of the settlers who took part in the 450 documented attacks on Palestinians over the last two years.



First I never said DCIP is a terrorist group (unless in your warped world think I run Israel).
Israel's official statement is that Defence for Children International are terrorists.
Do you agree or disagree with them?



We have different definitions of self defense. Self defense applies when you are being directly attacked and you can't get away, you can defend yourself against that person.
For instance if you were living under a military occupation with military checkpoints, would you say you couldn't get away?
Like the Palestinians in Gaza, they live inside the world's largest open air prison.
Or in the West Bank?
Can they get away?

Its all a slippery slope, basketcase.
Once you admit that settlers do act as 'terrorists' some times that would mean they could use the same rationale you use against Palestinians, that they 'thought they were 'terrorists'.
That's why its better to do away with the totally political term 'terrorist' and just go for war crimes, crimes against humanity and human rights violations like apartheid.

You should just join me in calling for both sides to be held to the law through the ICC.
That's the way to de-escalate.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,843
6,341
113
Congratulations, this is the first time that you've ever admitted that Palestinians have a right to self defense against settlers in any situation.
...
Obviously you can't read what I said or care what the rights groups you claim to support say as you justify attacks on civilians.

1642039533778.png
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,644
17,845
113
Obviously you can't read what I said or care what the rights groups you claim to support say as you justify attacks on civilians.
Sure, basketcase. They are 'terrorists' like Defence for Children International, who incidentally appear to have been deemed 'terrorists' for daring to support taking Israel to the ICC.
They were also hacked by NSO, the Israeli hackers that Apple is taking to court, the same one that hacked Canadians, the same ones that hacked Khashoggi before he was assassinated.

You really are on a journey of truth and human rights, aren't you?

 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,843
6,341
113
Sure, basketcase. They are 'terrorists' ...
So you're now claiming Canada is apartheid and demonizing Palestinians by including them on the list? You really are going to great lengths to justify attacks on Jewish civilians. I guess that's one place where you actually agree with many Palestinians.

1642124185468.png
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,644
17,845
113
So you're now claiming Canada is apartheid and demonizing Palestinians by including them on the list? You really are going to great lengths to justify attacks on Jewish civilians. I guess that's one place where you actually agree with many Palestinians.
Its Friday, basketcase, but its still a bit early for drinking.

I oppose injustice.
That includes apartheid.

Emma Watson’s support for Palestinians backed by celebs: ‘We oppose injustice anywhere’
Emma Watson was accused of anti-Semitism last week
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,843
6,341
113
You been hanging out with Ambassador Danon or something again?
Nice attempt to avoid reality. You really need some better tricks. Hamas, PFLP, PIJ, are all terrorist entities as designated by Canada.

And as I said before, I have absolutely no problem with Watson's post. Unlike you, she hasn't hit multiple points on Canada's definition of antisemitism.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,644
17,845
113
Nice attempt to avoid reality. You really need some better tricks. Hamas, PFLP, PIJ, are all terrorist entities as designated by Canada.

And as I said before, I have absolutely no problem with Watson's post. Unlike you, she hasn't hit multiple points on Canada's definition of antisemitism.
You need some better tricks now that Israel says Defence for Children International are terrorists.
And if you are still so worried about terrorists its time for you to disavow the Israeli government that elected a party recognized as terrorists by Canada.

Those tricks are done.

Now its time to talk about ending apartheid, racism and settler colonialism.
Its time for equal rights.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,843
6,341
113
You need some better tricks now that Israel says...
I care about what Canada says. They say Hamas is a terrorist entity. So is PFLP, PIJ, and several others. They also say Israel is a strong trade partner and that many of your posts include examples of antisemitic behaviour.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,843
6,341
113
Glad to hear it.
...
So you admit Hamas, PFLP, PIJ and other Palestinian factions are terrorists?


Even if you say Hamas leadership admitting their goal is ethnic cleansing Jews from the region and admitting they intentionally target random Jewish civilians, yo would still be trying to say it's not true.


p.s. That poll clearly shows, support for ICC investigations of Israel is lower than support for investigations elsewhere. And unlike you, most Canadians support Hamas being treated as a terror group as long as they act as a terror group.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,644
17,845
113
So you admit Hamas, PFLP, PIJ and other Palestinian factions are terrorists?
As much as the Kahanists elected to the Israeli parliament and Defence For Children International are 'terrorists'.

Its a term you use to dehumanize and justify war crimes on civilians, by defending Israel's claiming all of Gaza are 'terrorists' you support Israel targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure like hospitals, schools, apartment buildings and media centers.

You really should look at what you are defending and the repercussions of calling all Palestinians by this label.

 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,843
6,341
113
As much as the Kahanists elected to the Israeli parliament ...
Another dumb defense of Hamas.

You keep focussing on a party elected to one seat in the opposition who isn't as member of a designated terrorist entity (even through they have same philosophical root as one) while ignoring that Hamas government in Gaza is entirely a designated entity and the PA is run by people with the same philosophical root as terrorists (who are members of the ruling party). Just another of your asinine double standard.

But sure, keep on saying Canada is racist for calling Hamas terrorists just because Hamas commits acts of terrorism.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,644
17,845
113
Another dumb defense of Hamas.

You keep focussing on a party elected to one seat in the opposition who isn't as member of a designated terrorist entity (even through they have same philosophical root as one) while ignoring that Hamas government in Gaza is entirely a designated entity and the PA is run by people with the same philosophical root as terrorists (who are members of the ruling party). Just another of your asinine double standard.

But sure, keep on saying Canada is racist for calling Hamas terrorists just because Hamas commits acts of terrorism.
Your entire argument these days is based on being able to label Palestinians as 'terrorists'.
Because if you admit that 90%+ of Gaza is actually civilians and close to half the population are children, you'd be left defending acts that you would define as 'terrorism'.

Its the word you use to dehumanize.
To justify treating Palestinians under apartheid as not deserving of full human rights.

Which is why almost every post by you includes either 'Hamas' or 'terrorist'.
And never 'human rights'.

But its a human rights issue now.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,843
6,341
113
Your entire argument these days is based on being able to label Palestinians as 'terrorists'.
Because if you admit that 90%+ of Gaza is actually civilians and close to half the population are children, you'd be left defending acts that you would define as 'terrorism'.

Its the word you use to dehumanize.
To justify treating Palestinians under apartheid as not deserving of full human rights.

Which is why almost every post by you includes either 'Hamas' or 'terrorist'.
And never 'human rights'.

But its a human rights issue now.
Is this your attempt at slander of is it just a desperate attempt to avoid admitting Hamas, PIJ, and PFLP are terrorist entities? You must be really sad living in a country so racist as to call them terrorists.
 
Toronto Escorts