You make people's money go further by not fleecing them with outrageous taxes to pay for other people's lifestyles.So how do you do that?
How do you make it so that only one person in a relationship needs to work to support a family?
You make people's money go further by not fleecing them with outrageous taxes to pay for other people's lifestyles.So how do you do that?
How do you make it so that only one person in a relationship needs to work to support a family?
Oh Christ. You do not want to pay taxes. There is an obvious solution to that.You make people's money go further by not fleecing them with outrageous taxes to pay for other people's lifestyles.
Best household was when one parent stays home to look after the kids
...daycare are not substitute to parenting, they're an alternative...
That's right. Who needs to raise their children?That may be your ideal but not everyone's. In order foe their to be greater participation on the workforce which Canada needs there must be access to affordable daycare.
There is no compulsion for both parents to work.That's right. Who needs to raise their children?
Your true purpose on earth is to slave your life away to maximize shareholder value, while they inadequately grow and indoctrinate your child.
You make people's money go further by not fleecing them with outrageous taxes to pay for other people's lifestyles.
What are you even saying?There is no compulsion for both parents to work.
However, I would like to point out to you that your quaint picture of a single family home and a home going mother is not the reality in Canada. As a start, take a look at the statistics for single parents
That's right. Who needs to raise their children?
Your true purpose on earth is to slave your life away to maximize shareholder value, while they inadequately grow and indoctrinate your child.
How about we start with getting rid of the carbon tax?So you want to cut services and taxes.
Which services do you cut to pay for those tax cuts?
It's a shame isn't it? It's almost like we need real change.you may not believe this but many families need the second income and as well many women need or want the stimulation etc of work outside of the home. The situation would be totally different if men had to stay home with children.
It's a shame isn't it? It's almost like we need real change.
You do realize that one item on your list would pay for most of what is needed:How about we start with getting rid of the carbon tax?
How about reducing the size of government?
How about we stop renaming streets?
How about we open up government construction projects to non-union companies?
How about we stop sending money we don't have to Ukraine?
How about we stop spending money and reduce inflation so less of our taxes are needed to pay off government debt?
Somehow, 50 years ago the roads were maintained, hospitals provided good service, and people could afford homes even while paying taxes...today taxes are significantly higher...the system is broken and continually increasing taxes and creating new ones isn't fixing anything except enabling lazy governments.
It's the sum of all parts.You do realize that one item on your list would pay for most of what is needed:
How about we stop sending money we don't have to Ukraine?
You do realize that one item on your list would pay for most of what is needed:
How about we stop sending money we don't have to Ukraine?
How about we start with getting rid of the carbon tax?
How about reducing the size of government?
How about we stop renaming streets?
How about we open up government construction projects to non-union companies?
How about we stop sending money we don't have to Ukraine?
How about we stop spending money and reduce inflation so less of our taxes are needed to pay off government debt?
Somehow, 50 years ago the roads were maintained, hospitals provided good service, and people could afford homes even while paying taxes...today taxes are significantly higher...the system is broken and continually increasing taxes and creating new ones isn't fixing anything except enabling lazy governments.
No, of we did not send $B10 to Ukraine we would have had $B10 more money to spend on investments in the future.because if Russia win this we will have even less money.
No, of we did not send $B10 to Ukraine we would have had $B10 more money to spend on investments in the future.
Don't tell me that you believe in the old domino theory?be careful how Russia will impact our life if they get a hold of Ukraine. Our leaders are not as dumb as you think.