Crooked judge cannon throws out the documents case
- Thread starter dirtydaveiii
- Start date
I don't provide you with "proof on demand" anymore remember?
You never accept it and end up moving the goal posts. Every time.
I prefer to use your method of engagement where I simply refuse to accept any proof you provide and accuse you of lying.
What's good for the goose right?
Are you seriously asking for proof that he was acquitted twice for those bogus impeachments? Do you think I just made that up?
Have you even tried to do a google search with a simple "Trump acquittals" in the search bar to see for yourself?
rump was impeached twice but not removed from office.
He was never 'acquitted' of being impeached.
Stop lying.
Why is it that when you don't like what you hear, because it goes against your narrative, you accuse the other person of lying?
Then when the proof is shown to you, you ignore it, change the subject and never offer an apology?
Just curious? Is it some weird fetish or something?
rump was impeached twice, skoob.
You know this is true so when you state otherwise you are lying.
You can apologize now...
'Not Guilty': Trump Acquitted On 2 Articles Of Impeachment As Historic Trial Closes
https://www.npr.org/2020/02/05/8014...icles-of-impeachment-as-historic-trial-closes
President Donald Trump was impeached twice during his single term in office. In each case, he was acquitted on all counts by the Senate.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S4-4-9/ALDE_00000035/
Trump Acquitted of Two Impeachment Charges in Near Party-Line Vote
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/05/us/politics/trump-acquitted-impeachment.html
Trump impeachment: president acquitted on both articles
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/feb/05/donald-trump-acquitted-senate-impeachment-trial
rump has been impeached twice and is still impeached.
Where you are lying is when you say he has not been impeached and is not still considered to be impeached twice.
From your last article.
President becomes third in US history to be impeached by the House and acquitted in Senate trial
Acquitted is a legal term. Impeachment was not a legal proceeding. After all, the "jury" in impeachment is often made up of your friends. After all, the US constitution says AFTER impeachment a president is subject to legal proceedings. Thus it separates the political from the legal.
Thus you've confused a political process with a legal proceeding. Then blamed me for not being equally confused.
Thus, what legal trial was he acquitted?
This happens on the news sources you frequent. They consistently confound and confuse their viewers/listeners. Trump does that all the time (e.g., presidential records act is not what trump says it is). And the Fox people don't check the misinformation.
Carry on.
Where did I say he was never impeached or never impeached twice?
All I've ever said is that he was acquitted and you keep saying that's not true and call me a liar.
No wonder no one takes you seriously or trusts you. Perfect example.
I beat a couple parking tickets in court and they were thrown out because they were issued wrongfully and I didn't violate any parking laws.
That doesn't mean that I'm actually guilty just because I received the tickets.
You owe me an apology for accusing me of lying when I didn't. (that's two you owe me just this week)
I owe you nothing.
You lied and said rump wasn't impeached.
You beat the tickets, rump was fined $85 million for lying about one of his rape victims and was found guilty of 34 counts of felony.
You need to accept those verdicts and say you just back giving rapists and felons control of all of america's tax cash and army.
I'll offer you an apology if you find any previous post that I said specifically he was not impeached.
If you can't find that then you owe me an apology for calling me a liar.
Your next response should either provide evidence or an apology to me for accusing me of lying.
Go!
Meanwhile Hunter Biden appeals his conviction because his prosecutor was also illegal as per judge cannon or whatever her name is 
abcnews.go.com
Hunter Biden, citing Trump special counsel ruling, moves to dismiss cases against him
Attorneys for Hunter Biden, citing the recent dismissal of Donald Trump's classified documents case, are seeking to dismiss both federal criminal cases against him.
abcnews.go.com
Last edited:
Kudos to the judge for following the Constitution and squelching the latest desperate Democrat witch hunt.
You do realize every other court in the USA, including the US Supreme Court, disagrees with her interpretation? Sure, Clarence Thomas is sceptical of the independent prosecutor but that's likely because there is one in his future. But the other 8 justices are not sceptics.
So a judge who was overturned repeatedly and with prejudice by other conservative judges above her, and who disagrees with the entire rest of the US judiciary, is the only one who knows the constitution.
Carry on.
Separate rant.
It takes no fucking "courage" to follow the law.
When Trump et al calls out people for "courage" it's because he's asking them to ignore or break the law.
He said Mike Pence lacked courage, judge Cannon had courage. The vandals on Jan 6 had courage. The people who ignored subpoenas had courage. The people who testified under oath lacked courage.
Figure it the fuck out people.
It takes no fucking "courage" to follow the law.
When Trump et al calls out people for "courage" it's because he's asking them to ignore or break the law.
He said Mike Pence lacked courage, judge Cannon had courage. The vandals on Jan 6 had courage. The people who ignored subpoenas had courage. The people who testified under oath lacked courage.
Figure it the fuck out people.
Its the mob boss mentality.
He wants minions who have the 'courage' to do his dirty work.
There's a poll out that says 1/3 of 'mericans want military rule.
Why Some Americans Really Do Want an Authoritarian in Charge
Donald Trump’s strongman image is a plus for many voters.
newrepublic.com
