Crooked judge cannon throws out the documents case

[kherg007]

Separate rant.
It takes no fucking "courage" to follow the law.
When Trump et al calls out people for "courage" it's because he's asking them to ignore or break the law.
He said Mike Pence lacked courage, judge Cannon had courage. The vandals on Jan 6 had courage. The people who ignored subpoenas had courage. The people who testified under oath lacked courage.
Figure it the fuck out people.

 

[Frankfooter]

Separate rant.
It takes no fucking "courage" to follow the law.
When Trump et al calls out people for "courage" it's because he's asking them to ignore or break the law.
He said Mike Pence lacked courage, judge Cannon had courage. The vandals on Jan 6 had courage. The people who ignored subpoenas had courage. The people who testified under oath lacked courage.
Figure it the fuck out people.

Its the mob boss mentality.
He wants minions who have the 'courage' to do his dirty work.

There's a poll out that says 1/3 of 'mericans want military rule.

Why Some Americans Really Do Want an Authoritarian in Charge

Donald Trump’s strongman image is a plus for many voters.

newrepublic.com

 

[Skoob]

Post #51

Fail.
What does post #51 have to do with anything you've alleged (i.e. lied about) that I've said?

Why can't you just offer a simple apology for lying seeing as I gave you a great opportunity to prove me wrong and you couldn't?

 

[Frankfooter]

Fail.
What does post #51 have to do with anything you've alleged (i.e. lied about) that I've said?

Why can't you just offer a simple apology for lying seeing as I gave you a great opportunity to prove me wrong and you couldn't?

See?

When I prove my claims are solid and based on evidence you pretend it doesn't count or is 'irrelevant'.
Every single time.

Stick to telling us how noble your rapist felon is, skoob.
Its your only area of expertise.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813386889833111789

 

[Skoob]

See?

When I prove my claims are solid and based on evidence you pretend it doesn't count or is 'irrelevant'.
Every single time.

See what? You picking some random post as your proof?

OMFG how you constantly fall on your face is pure gold!

Thanks for once again proving you are a failure even after being given a glowing opportunity to show that you aren't.

 

[Frankfooter]

See what? You picking some random post as your proof?

OMFG how you constantly fall on your face is pure gold!

Thanks for once again proving you are a failure even after being given a glowing opportunity to show that you aren't.

You are the poster boy for the idiocracy.

 

[Skoob]

You are the poster boy for the idiocracy.

The only idiocracy here is me proving over and over again how untrustworthy you are and you coming back for more every time while doubling-down on your failure.

 

[Frankfooter]

The only idiocracy here is me

case in point

 

[Skoob]

case in point

The death knell when losing an argument...editing other members' posts.
Funny part is you're not even good at trolling but you keep trying! Lol!

 

[Valcazar]

I see none of the decision driven by evidence.

But that's what they like about it.
They are very big on celebrating "he got away with it on a technicality" because it shows that laws don't apply to him and that makes him alpha.
They aren't arguing that he didn't do it. They are arguing he is allowed to do it.
You have to remember how deeply authoritarian these people are.

 

[Valcazar]

He was acquitted for Jan 6th btw.

He hasn't been tried for January 6th yet.

 

[Leimonis]

But that's what they like about it.
They are very big on celebrating "he got away with it on a technicality" because it shows that laws don't apply to him and that makes him alpha.
They aren't arguing that he didn't do it. They are arguing he is allowed to do it.
You have to remember how deeply authoritarian these people are.

I have always thought that Americans like freedom but they actually do like to have a master

that reminds me what Russians said when putin's new grand palace was exposed by the opposition as an undeniable proof of major corruption. They simply shrugged and said: what, is our leader supposed to live in a shack?

 

[Valcazar]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813591804295442690

This is long overdue, as I've discussed before.
I have even seen arguments for adding more circuits because of the imbalanced population and workload, but I haven't looked into how well thought out they are.
It certainly seems reasonable.

 

[Valcazar]

Acquitted is a legal term. Impeachment was not a legal proceeding. After all, the "jury" in impeachment is often made up of your friends. After all, the US constitution says AFTER impeachment a president is subject to legal proceedings. Thus it separates the political from the legal.
Thus you've confused a political process with a legal proceeding. Then blamed me for not being equally confused.
Thus, what legal trial was he acquitted?
This happens on the news sources you frequent. They consistently confound and confuse their viewers/listeners. Trump does that all the time (e.g., presidential records act is not what trump says it is). And the Fox people don't check the misinformation.
Carry on.

He hasn't confused them.
He's deliberately conflated them to try and pull a fast one.

 

[Skoob]

He hasn't been tried for January 6th yet.

Re impeachment...he was acquitted.

 

[Dutch Oven]

Acquitted is a legal term. Impeachment was not a legal proceeding. After all, the "jury" in impeachment is often made up of your friends. After all, the US constitution says AFTER impeachment a president is subject to legal proceedings. Thus it separates the political from the legal.
Thus you've confused a political process with a legal proceeding. Then blamed me for not being equally confused.
Thus, what legal trial was he acquitted?
This happens on the news sources you frequent. They consistently confound and confuse their viewers/listeners. Trump does that all the time (e.g., presidential records act is not what trump says it is). And the Fox people don't check the misinformation.
Carry on.

What you don't understand is that not all legal proceedings are litigated before courts. Many are determined by administrative tribunals or by publicly appointed officials. Impeachment by the House is comparable to an indictment in criminal procedure. The Senate is empowered to hold a trial as to the articles of impeachment. It was a legal proceeding, just not a proceeding before the courts. The Senate was empowered to effect specific sanctions and remedies if it had found guilt. It didn't.

The only person confused about this point is you.

 

[Valcazar]

Kudos to the judge for following the Constitution and squelching the latest desperate Democrat witch hunt.

Except for the part where she specifically ignores the Constitution in her ruling.

You do realize every other court in the USA, including the US Supreme Court, disagrees with her interpretation? Sure, Clarence Thomas is sceptical of the independent prosecutor but that's likely because there is one in his future. But the other 8 justices are not sceptics.
So a judge who was overturned repeatedly and with prejudice by other conservative judges above her, and who disagrees with the entire rest of the US judiciary, is the only one who knows the constitution.
Carry on.

You have to remember that "The Constitution" to these people means "whatever will get me my preferred political result".
The actual text and precedents have nothing to do with it.

 

[Valcazar]

Re impeachment...he was acquitted.

Not a trial.
You're the person going on endlessly about how people shouldn't call Trump a rapist because it wasn't a criminal trial and isn't technically correct.

There's no way someone as obsessed with legal specifics as you would be so clumsy and obvious as to pretend that the Senate trial was the same thing as a criminal trial.
That would be so obvious and ham-fisted, even for a Trump supporter, that no one can possibly think you would be silly enough to try it.

/s

 

[Valcazar]

What you don't understand is that not all legal proceedings are litigated before courts. Many are determined by administrative tribunals or by publicly appointed officials. Impeachment by the House is comparable to an indictment in criminal procedure. The Senate is empowered to hold a trial as to the articles of impeachment. It was a legal proceeding, just not a proceeding before the courts. The Senate was empowered to effect specific sanctions and remedies if it had found guilt. It didn't.

The only person confused about this point is you.

Take it up with Skoob.
He disagrees with you.

 

[Skoob]

Take it up with Skoob.
He disagrees with you.

Why would you think I would disagree?