Fail.
What does post #51 have to do with anything you've alleged (i.e. lied about) that I've said?
Why can't you just offer a simple apology for lying seeing as I gave you a great opportunity to prove me wrong and you couldn't?
Crooked judge cannon throws out the documents case
- Thread starter dirtydaveiii
- Start date
What does post #51 have to do with anything you've alleged (i.e. lied about) that I've said?
Why can't you just offer a simple apology for lying seeing as I gave you a great opportunity to prove me wrong and you couldn't?
See?
When I prove my claims are solid and based on evidence you pretend it doesn't count or is 'irrelevant'.
Every single time.
Stick to telling us how noble your rapist felon is, skoob.
Its your only area of expertise.
See what? You picking some random post as your proof?
OMFG how you constantly fall on your face is pure gold!
Thanks for once again proving you are a failure even after being given a glowing opportunity to show that you aren't.
The only idiocracy here is me proving over and over again how untrustworthy you are and you coming back for more every time while doubling-down on your failure.
The death knell when losing an argument...editing other members' posts.
Funny part is you're not even good at trolling but you keep trying! Lol!
But that's what they like about it.
They are very big on celebrating "he got away with it on a technicality" because it shows that laws don't apply to him and that makes him alpha.
They aren't arguing that he didn't do it. They are arguing he is allowed to do it.
You have to remember how deeply authoritarian these people are.
I have always thought that Americans like freedom but they actually do like to have a master
that reminds me what Russians said when putin's new grand palace was exposed by the opposition as an undeniable proof of major corruption. They simply shrugged and said: what, is our leader supposed to live in a shack?
Last edited:
This is long overdue, as I've discussed before.
I have even seen arguments for adding more circuits because of the imbalanced population and workload, but I haven't looked into how well thought out they are.
It certainly seems reasonable.
He hasn't confused them.
He's deliberately conflated them to try and pull a fast one.
What you don't understand is that not all legal proceedings are litigated before courts. Many are determined by administrative tribunals or by publicly appointed officials. Impeachment by the House is comparable to an indictment in criminal procedure. The Senate is empowered to hold a trial as to the articles of impeachment. It was a legal proceeding, just not a proceeding before the courts. The Senate was empowered to effect specific sanctions and remedies if it had found guilt. It didn't.
The only person confused about this point is you.
Except for the part where she specifically ignores the Constitution in her ruling.
You have to remember that "The Constitution" to these people means "whatever will get me my preferred political result".
The actual text and precedents have nothing to do with it.
Not a trial.
You're the person going on endlessly about how people shouldn't call Trump a rapist because it wasn't a criminal trial and isn't technically correct.
There's no way someone as obsessed with legal specifics as you would be so clumsy and obvious as to pretend that the Senate trial was the same thing as a criminal trial.
That would be so obvious and ham-fisted, even for a Trump supporter, that no one can possibly think you would be silly enough to try it.
/s
You think criminal trials are the only thing allowed to be commented on.
Acquitted in the senate, which is specifically a vote on "do not remove from office" not a vote on "did he do it", does not qualify as a "real" acquittal in your world.
It won't count until he faces criminal trial for January 6th.
We wouldn't want to think you were a giant hypocrite now, would we?
2/3 of the senate are required to vote on conviction. That didn't happen and they fell short.
How many different ways would you like to twist things to suit your narrative?
ie witch hunt waged...with hunt failed.
Move on.
