I personally haven't heard anything about lesbians or DEI from official channels like the President-elect, nominated Cabinet members or Congress. I suppose there will be one or two political outliers shooting their mouth off about what they don't like.Well, no.....
The actual criticism from MAGA is that CA failed because it has "3 lesbians named Kristin running the LAFD". You can try and spin that, if you want.... I suppose.
But the companion thread to this one on TERB features your buddies Addict and Mitchell specifically singling out DEI practises and has 4 x as many views and posts, mainly the TERB MAGAts attacking DEI and raising other unfounded horseshit about the fire response.
If the GOP and MAGA have actually raised well founded technical concerns about the fire response, I have yet to read them
And why is Sacramento responsible for choices made by LA?
The GOP concerns are around clearing brush, fire breaks and water retention/distribution. It seems like I have been hearing about the lack of prevention and preparation for over ten years now.
I'm not sure why you think the State of California (Sacramento) is not part of directing wildfire prevention policy around the state. This would be one issue where I wouldn't be arguing that responsibility is atomized. Don't worry the L.A. Mayor will not be re-elected.
Lastly, there's a lot of members I simply tune-out because I don't think they well-represent any political group in the U.S. or Canada.