They approve deporting illegals period.As you can see from the poll, the majority of Republican voters still do support these things.
But the % of them who support ICE has possibly reduced to a point that overall a majority disapprove of ICE.
They approve deporting illegals period.As you can see from the poll, the majority of Republican voters still do support these things.
But the % of them who support ICE has possibly reduced to a point that overall a majority disapprove of ICE.
You are misusing the term "potential citizens" in the report and using AI to misinterpret it out of context.According to Google AI it means they're not actually US citizens.
Another @Valcazar fail
Read: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+does+the+term+Potential+US+citizens+mean?&sca_esv=4d0c9b7f74717d86&sxsrf=AE3TifOFF7Cw58mZyFNz07fdcn_yPoowqw:1765043658629&source=hp&ei=ym00ade-I8vM0PEP89aI0Qk&oq=what+does+the+term+Potential+US+citizens+mean?&gs_lp=EhFtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1ocCIud2hhdCBkb2VzIHRoZSB0ZXJtIFBvdGVudGlhbCBVUyBjaXRpemVucyBtZWFuPzIFECEYoAFI62JQjg5YgGFwAXgAkAEAmAHVAqABkRSqAQcwLjkuNC4xuAEDyAEA-AEBmAIOoALyEqgCLcICBxAjGCcY6gLCAgcQLhgnGOoCwgINECMY8AUYJxjqAhieBsICChAjGPAFGCcY6gLCAg0QIxjwBRgnGMkCGOoCwgIQEAAYAxi0AhjqAhiPAdgBAcICEBAuGAMYtAIY6gIYjwHYAQHCAgYQABgWGB7CAgUQIRifBcICBRAAGO8FwgIEEAAYHsICBhAAGAgYHsICCBAAGKIEGIkFwgIIEAAYgAQYogTCAggQABgHGAgYHsICBBAhGAqYAw3xBXoAyKXi0c9YugYECAEYCpIHBzEuOS4zLjGgB6kmsgcHMC45LjMuMbgH5RLCBwcwLjQuOS4xyAc7gAgA&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-hp
The term "Potential Citizens" here denotes uncertainty on the person's status.In recent years, some U.S. citizens have claimed they were mistakenly identified as foreign nationals and detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or held by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on immigration charges.
I doubt anyone here is really an expert on U.S. immigration law.My bad then, I read it wrong.
But the paragraph you posted actually makes your case look even worse, because it says Trump deported POTENTIAL citizens, it doesn't say actual citizens.
Maybe they were in the process of getting their US citizenship, but they were suspected criminals or terrorists, and thats why they were deported??
If thats true then it makes Trump's deportations perfectly legal
No, they say they support some amount of deportations, which is conditional on certain criteria.They approve deporting illegals period.
And this means they aren't civilians but are military targets?They don't but they are a criminal org that have been categorized as terrorists..
Lets say your interpretation of "potential citizens" is correct. From Valcie's article:You are misusing the term "potential citizens" in the report and using AI to misinterpret it out of context.
The report says:
The term "Potential Citizens" here denotes uncertainty on the person's status.
Not green card holders or others who are not citizens.
Not to mention, non-citizens who are on the pathway to become legal citizens such as green hard holders, can also not be deported for no reason.
That is still unlawful and unconstitutional
In that case it means the 70 potential US citizens were investigated and deemed not to be US citizens." Available data indicate ICE and CBP took enforcement actions against some U.S. citizens. For example, available ICE data indicate that ICE arrested 674, detained 121, and removed 70 potential U.S. citizens from fiscal year 2015 through the second quarter of fiscal year 2020"
That is not necessary.In that case it means the 70 potential US citizens were investigated and deemed not to be US citizens.
Until you show evidence that contradicts that its the only conclusion you can make
And given the Trump administration's documented actions to actually remove citizens:In recent years, some U.S. citizens have claimed they were mistakenly identified as foreign nationals
You have difficulty proving he's fascist.Do you have difficulty reading?
Again, you could try and, you know, read the article.My bad then, I read it wrong.
But the paragraph you posted actually makes your case look even worse, because it says Trump deported POTENTIAL citizens, it doesn't say actual citizens.
Maybe they were in the process of getting their US citizenship, but they were suspected criminals or terrorists, and thats why they were deported??
If thats true then it makes Trump's deportations perfectly legal
Potential, as explained in the text of the report summary.Does the chart Valcazar posted show deportations of POTENTIAL citizens or ACTUAL US citizens??
Actually, that is necessary. You need proof, and you dont have itThat is not necessary
Yes, this is what the report is saying.Potential US citizens.
Potential US citizens could potentially be actual citizens, so you cannot be careless with it, which the Trump administration is.
According to Google AI it means they're not actually US citizens.
Another @Valcazar fail
Read: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+does+the+term+Potential+US+citizens+mean?&sca_esv=4d0c9b7f74717d86&sxsrf=AE3TifOFF7Cw58mZyFNz07fdcn_yPoowqw:1765043658629&source=hp&ei=ym00ade-I8vM0PEP89aI0Qk&oq=what+does+the+term+Potential+US+citizens+mean?&gs_lp=EhFtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1ocCIud2hhdCBkb2VzIHRoZSB0ZXJtIFBvdGVudGlhbCBVUyBjaXRpemVucyBtZWFuPzIFECEYoAFI62JQjg5YgGFwAXgAkAEAmAHVAqABkRSqAQcwLjkuNC4xuAEDyAEA-AEBmAIOoALyEqgCLcICBxAjGCcY6gLCAgcQLhgnGOoCwgINECMY8AUYJxjqAhieBsICChAjGPAFGCcY6gLCAg0QIxjwBRgnGMkCGOoCwgIQEAAYAxi0AhjqAhiPAdgBAcICEBAuGAMYtAIY6gIYjwHYAQHCAgYQABgWGB7CAgUQIRifBcICBRAAGO8FwgIEEAAYHsICBhAAGAgYHsICCBAAGKIEGIkFwgIIEAAYgAQYogTCAggQABgHGAgYHsICBBAhGAqYAw3xBXoAyKXi0c9YugYECAEYCpIHBzEuOS4zLjGgB6kmsgcHMC45LjMuMbgH5RLCBwcwLjQuOS4xyAc7gAgA&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-hp
Then thats simply a bug that needs to be fixed, but it doesnt show Trump is INTENTIONALLY deporting US citizens.Again, you could try and, you know, read the article.
I know you proudly argued that Conservatives are dumber, but I'm not sure why you are putting effort into that idea.
"Further, while ICE policy requires officers to document citizenship investigations in ICE data systems, it does not require officers to update the citizenship field after identifying evidence that an individual may be a U.S. citizen. As a result, ICE does not know the extent to which its officers are taking enforcement actions against individuals who could be U.S. citizens."
And then you doubled down?
Yes, that is what am saying.You need proof...
That's a lot of motivated reasoning, Wyatt.I doubt anyone here is really an expert on U.S. immigration law.
I have a hard time following the immigration debate when the media outlet and the reporter clearly are showing bias or leaving out details.
I read an article about an illegal immigrant not getting due process. I then find another discussing a conviction or evading justice for a violent crime. In some instances, the reporter vaguely mentions appealing court decisions.
Now we have obvious biases here, but I know some of us don't necessarily believe that people in our countries illegally are entitled to extended appeals processes. In my opinion, this just supports the Biden-era thought process. Get them into the country and we will figure out the rest later. You know they're "potential citizens". I guess "undocumented" is no longer registering with a majority of the public.
You need proof US citizens were deported for no reason.Yes, that is what am saying
No it does not show that.Lets say your interpretation of "potential citizens" is correct. From Valcie's article:
In that case it means the 70 potential US citizens were investigated and deemed not to be US citizens.
Until you show evidence that contradicts that its the only conclusion you can make
Respond to this: https://terb.cc/xenforo/threads/civil-war-maga-in-turmoil.906975/post-9202893No it does not show that.
Again, have you tried reading the piece, instead of trying to mine it for sound bites to try and defend your position?
Or you could read the whole report if you wanted to
Read the report and the wiki article.You need proof US citizens were deported for no reason.
Do you have this proof?? Please post it





