CIA Have Detected Putin's Direct Hacking into USA Elections
- Thread starter bver_hunter
- Start date
The Republicans AND democrats wouldn't really have any security to those lists. They would WANT their various agents, cyber, phone, door to door to be able to access them easily, especially at the state and precinct level.
This inst high level stuff fuji. At all. It wouldn't surpise me is the password was "password".
Or either "Trumpsucks" for the Dems and "Hillaryblows" for the GoP.
But the private emails of the DNC server got hacked. And they REFUSED to allow the FBI to investigate. Why? I wonder what information was lost. And that they were worried that information would get out during the campaign.
They were more worried about CYA then security. And that's why they look so bad.
The only hack that occurred was to the DNC of any consequence. It has been determined by DHC that no voting machines were compromised. Attacks sure. Unsuccessful ones.
Or so crappy they gave Hillary more votes!
Seriously fuji just accept the following things.
Trump won legitimately.
Clinton lost legitimately.
Both were terrible.
And now it's time to make the best of things. All these investigations are about the election outcome and that they can't accept it. And as a result of their efforts the Dems have nothing to show for it but four special election losses.
They need to start thinking about what's wrong with themselves instead of seeking scapegoats for their own failures.
A few are now. More will as losses mount. Upcoming elections are as much a referendum on Pelosi and crowd as Trump. Without significant gains they will find themselves turfed as well.
If obstruction charges against Lynch don't get them first.
That is exactly what I am saying and I know a lot more about Russia than you do.
Or alternatively, Putin ALWAYS meant to turn on the West, but the Ukrainian Revolution of 2014 forced his hand and made him change his stance abruptly and drastically when he had to seize Crimea.
Latest is that the RNC was hacked as well, but Wikileaks / Putin released no compromising material re the RNC / GOP. As well, I understand that voter data in the electoral records system was also hacked that makes it plausible for the Russians to thoroughly and catastrophically subvert future elections.
I am more concerned with preventing future Russian subversion. The Russians attempted to hack the Ukrainian electoral system in 2015 and thought - wrongly - that they had succeeded. As well, Wikileaks predictably hit Putin foe Macron in the last French election. If you're not concerned with this shit, then that is because you're still preening that your boy won the last US election and take this all a little too personally.
Of course I'm concerned. I want the agencies to go after the Russians.
But that isn't what the Dems want. They want to play politics.
We are in more agreement then you think. But I'm not shocked by the attempts of the Russians. I expect it.
The Dems didn't take it seriously. And when it came back to bite them on the ass only now it's a crisis.
As I asked fuji I'm waiting for an intelligence agency to come out and state this. And that information was compromised. Could it have happened? Of course.
But as I said before as well. The DNC leak proved that they colluded within to crown Clinton. That the primary was a sham.
What exactly could have been in the RNC database, who essentially publicly stated their opposition to Trump, that could have hurt Trump in the election.
And one has ever answered that either.
OK. And I'm going to say that Romney who was receiving security briefings on the campaign trail would know a hell of a lot more than you.
So when it comes down to who knew more Romney kicks your ass. And now history has shown he was right.
And Obama was wrong.
As it states in the article. No direct effect. Attempts without success.
And considering he lost the popular vote I'd say that was correct.
Trump clearly asked Putin and Russia to hack into Clinton's emails that were supposed to contain very secret information. This nutcase encouraged the Russians to intervene in the elections. Then he criticised Obama's sanctions and expulsion of the Russian diplomats and praised Putin for the way in which he handled the sanctions and expulsions. Trump was briefed by both the CIA and the FBI, about the Russian interventions in the elections, and he has been in office for six months, all he has done is warmly welcomed the Russian Ministers and criticised the FBI chief that he fired. Yes, slammed Comey in front of Russian Minister.
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/videos/a55893/trump-russia-hack-hillary/
Neither do you. But he predicted the Russian threat two years in advance. So history is on his side.
And Obama didn't just ignore it. He dismissed it publicly didn't he.
He was engaged in hyperbole and playing to the crowd. Being the jackass he is. Funny how so many say you can't take anything he says seriously unless they feel like using it later to prove a stupid point.
In 2012, there was no indication that Russia was going to become hostile. Any suggestion by you that Romney was more insightful - as opposed to just selecting a talking point that was distinct from Obama's - is speculation. I'm not going to deal with this anymore and will ignore your future posts on this point as time-wasters.
Breaking today, major hacking attempt on Ukraine government's computer system.
Oh, I wonder who is doing this???!! Could it be Russia and Putin??!!! But the entire Russian hacking investigation is a tedious time waster. Why would the US even bother to investigate them??!!
Oh, I wonder who is doing this???!! Could it be Russia and Putin??!!! But the entire Russian hacking investigation is a tedious time waster. Why would the US even bother to investigate them??!!
